You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
4
Vlad_The_Impaler on scored.co
10 hours ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)1 child
"jewish tyranny" sounds better than "anarcho-tyranny" just from a marketing standpoint.
Also i probably made the mistake of associating "anarchism" with "anarcho-tyranny" the first time i heard it. So it would not surprise me if others make the same mistake i did.
All sorts of tyranny seem to require double standards or selective enforcement. We definitely have selective enforcement of the law in the USA. Trump and Republicans never arrest anyone. Democrats do. So only one side of the fake two party system is actually utilizing the criminal justice system to their advantage, while the other plays to lose.
> of associating "anarchism" with "anarcho-tyranny"
Anarchy is really just theoretical, because it never occurred. It would be a society without an entity that has legitimate violence, like the government does.
You could argue Africa had plenty of Anarchy, but 1. they are niggers, so whatever they manifest is chaos and misery, 2. they sure had some kind of government on the scale of villages and tribes, 3. they weren't capable to manifest any large-scale form of government as we understand.
People associating Anarchy with "whatever niggers do in Africa" is silly. There are "governments" ran by niggers, and they are corrupt shitholes incarnate, basically a facade, a mockery of the entire concept. It's like how they try to rebuild airplanes by using random trash, which obviously doesn't work.
Also i probably made the mistake of associating "anarchism" with "anarcho-tyranny" the first time i heard it. So it would not surprise me if others make the same mistake i did.
All sorts of tyranny seem to require double standards or selective enforcement. We definitely have selective enforcement of the law in the USA. Trump and Republicans never arrest anyone. Democrats do. So only one side of the fake two party system is actually utilizing the criminal justice system to their advantage, while the other plays to lose.
> of associating "anarchism" with "anarcho-tyranny"
Anarchy is really just theoretical, because it never occurred. It would be a society without an entity that has legitimate violence, like the government does.
You could argue Africa had plenty of Anarchy, but 1. they are niggers, so whatever they manifest is chaos and misery, 2. they sure had some kind of government on the scale of villages and tribes, 3. they weren't capable to manifest any large-scale form of government as we understand.
People associating Anarchy with "whatever niggers do in Africa" is silly. There are "governments" ran by niggers, and they are corrupt shitholes incarnate, basically a facade, a mockery of the entire concept. It's like how they try to rebuild airplanes by using random trash, which obviously doesn't work.