Destruction in the name of "equality" (Rhodesia, South Africa, America)
(media.scored.co)
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Toast message
https://chroniclesmagazine.org/view/anarcho-tyranny-u-s-a/
To summarize: In order to go after vicious criminals who don't wear seat belts, they made room in prisons by letting out feral niggers. They went after normal people over minuscule issues but let actual criminals out of prison or go free.
- The government goes after group A
- The government supports group B
When you let niggers roam, it inevitably leads to African shithole conditions. Things get looted and burned.
> Under anarcho-tyranny, gun control laws do not usually target criminals who use guns to commit their crimes. The usual suspects are noncriminals who own, carry, or use guns against criminals
It's literally what the Bolsheviks did - to turn the justice system around to criminalize normal people and be lax on actual criminals (thieves, rapists, murderers). From [here](https://mises.org/mises-wire/how-soviets-used-common-criminals-destroy-regimes-enemies):
> [T]he new regime concentrated its pressive efforts on political opponents and class aliens. Amid the crowd of real or supposed enemies of the regime, non-political criminals were still regarded as socially akin; they received shorter terms of imprisonment and served them in less severe conditions.
In essence: Lax on one group (actual criminals), harsh on another group (possible dissidents).
> Once he was within the Gulag, the political criminal would then discover the second form of Soviet anarcho-tyranny.
So either we admit that tyranny = anarcho-tyranny, or we say that "tyranny" is a sub-category of "anarcho-tyranny", given how it must have been the predominant form of tyranny, and plain "tyranny" is a rare unicorn nowhere to be found.