Consume demoralization
(media.scored.co)
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Toast message
Step 1: Begin your reply by quote texting a set of square brackets. Fill them in with a disparaging verb or noun of choice—it doesn't matter which. Your objective is to make a grab for rhetorical high ground, not engage with your opponent in good faith.
Step 2: Pull the string on the doll's back, and insert one of his nifty signature quotes as a followup. You will be armed with zingers such as...
> Thanks for proving me right
> You're terrible at your job, paid jewish shill
> Scream for me~
> *KILL YOURSELF*
...and many more!
Step 3: Profit???
Additional tips to further refine your Mad Skilz:
**ALWAYS:** Accuse your opponent of having left your argument unaddressed. Especially effective if deployed immediately after your opponent has sent a lengthy message addressing your argument.
**NEVER:** Address your opponent's argument. Always evade. Gaslight relentlessly. You are fishing solely for the last word—every other aspect of the conversation is an obstacle to this goal.
Have fun never losing another argument on the internet again!
>it doesn't matter which.
Ooh, a strawman about strawmen. First-tier meta spam. Of course, in this instance, you’re humiliating yourself. I notice you have no complaint about **Scallion’s comment, which explicitly did what you claim my comment did.** Openly lying about what someone says is fine as long as the lie makes you feel good instead of being a truth that hurts your feelings, right?
> Your objective is to make a grab for rhetorical high ground, not engage with your opponent in good faith.
Which is why Scallion is physically incapable of providing any citations or sources for his claims in any topic, or of disproving anything I have said on any topic, right?
Oh, you were talking about me again! Ha! Look at that; you don’t say a word about the people who are shitting their pants in fear of the truth—you only ever talk about the people who look truth in the eye. How about that.
> Thanks for proving me right
Why can’t you provide citations or sources that prove me wrong?
>You're terrible at your job, paid jewish shill
Why are you defending the “right” of literal paid shills to post here?
>Scream for me~
You mean like you’re doing right now? And like how every single other leftist does when faced with their emotions being hijacked? All you have to do is post on topic. You refuse. Scream for me.
>KILL YOURSELF
*Why do you want people who openly support white genocide to remain alive?*
>ALWAYS: Accuse your opponent of having left your argument unaddressed.
You mean like Scallion did?
>your opponent has sent a lengthy message addressing your argument.
Funny how you can’t post any links to this happening, though, isn’t it?
>NEVER: Address your opponent's argument.
You mean like Scallion did?
>Always evade. Gaslight relentlessly.
Like Scallion’s post right above mine?
>You are fishing solely for the last word
Watch Breadpilled get the last word.
*pulls string*
Edit: Seems this one's defective. Shucks.