You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
3
PurestEvil on scored.co
2 days ago3 points(+0/-0/+3Score on mirror)
I'm not sure if this is even right. I've made this in the past: https://communities.win/c/ConsumeProduct/p/1994fUigZq/iq-distribution-in-the-us-based-/c
It was quite peculiar, but thinking about it, one way to ensure it's 100 average (to normalize it for the country), would be to shift it 5 points to the right. That's why the average IQ of niggers is higher than it actually should be. But the actual average IQ in the US, without false normalization to country (but only to race) would be 95.
Through the normalization process it can be skewed and distorted. This is how it can be tricked. Another example is the Dunning-Kruger effect: https://communities.win/c/ConsumeProduct/p/19BZgFte5c/dunningkruger-effect--fake-and-g/c
The trick is to use y = confidence/competence, thus making it converge towards 1 as it approaches 100% (=1). Thus the left side has a much wider range of variance than the right side. It's a trick. The actual graphs from their data were 2 smooth, unspectacular lines.
It was quite peculiar, but thinking about it, one way to ensure it's 100 average (to normalize it for the country), would be to shift it 5 points to the right. That's why the average IQ of niggers is higher than it actually should be. But the actual average IQ in the US, without false normalization to country (but only to race) would be 95.
Through the normalization process it can be skewed and distorted. This is how it can be tricked. Another example is the Dunning-Kruger effect: https://communities.win/c/ConsumeProduct/p/19BZgFte5c/dunningkruger-effect--fake-and-g/c
The trick is to use y = confidence/competence, thus making it converge towards 1 as it approaches 100% (=1). Thus the left side has a much wider range of variance than the right side. It's a trick. The actual graphs from their data were 2 smooth, unspectacular lines.