New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
I've heard the jew side of the story endlessly. I want to hear the Nazi side of the story.

I understand the punitive nature of the treaty of Versillies, the loss of territory and hyperinflation. Based on that it seems reasonable thet Nazi Germany would break the treaty. Maybe even taking back the territory in Poland. But what was the justification for pushing further into Poland? And for the invasion of France? The way I see it the French had adopted a defensive posture at that point, as evidenced by the Maginot line. Why did the the Germans invade?

Also wondering what the justification for betraying the Russians was? I don't buy the jew argument which just says that Hitler thought the Russians would be easy to defeat due to their racial inferiority.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
cis_scum on scored.co
29 days ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
That's just completely wrong, communism was the entire reason for WW2, namely the crushing of communism and the genocidal, jewish, Bolshevik threat that was on Europe's doorstep.
zk3hf9dB on scored.co
27 days ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Take Communism out of the picture, put a belligerent Russia in its place, and it's the same scenario, except this time with a government that might feel a little remorse for condemning millions of her people to die fighting Germans.

Historically, Russia and Germany were always close, the same way US and the UK have been. Thus, there was never any real reason for Germans to fear an invasion from Russia and vice-versa.

The communist government was definitely a cause, but not necessarily because of communism -- it was the belligerence of communism that caused a problem.

Had the jewish bolsheviks had any sense at all, they would've never antagonized Germany.
Toast message