New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
I've heard the jew side of the story endlessly. I want to hear the Nazi side of the story.

I understand the punitive nature of the treaty of Versillies, the loss of territory and hyperinflation. Based on that it seems reasonable thet Nazi Germany would break the treaty. Maybe even taking back the territory in Poland. But what was the justification for pushing further into Poland? And for the invasion of France? The way I see it the French had adopted a defensive posture at that point, as evidenced by the Maginot line. Why did the the Germans invade?

Also wondering what the justification for betraying the Russians was? I don't buy the jew argument which just says that Hitler thought the Russians would be easy to defeat due to their racial inferiority.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
zk3hf9dB on scored.co
29 days ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Hitler was too kind. He was an artist, not a warrior, nor a politician or statesman.
steele2 on scored.co
29 days ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
Hitler was a war hero.

He armed us with everything we need to end the jew.

This is day #31,540 of WW2.

zk3hf9dB on scored.co
27 days ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
I can't help but think what German history would've looked like had there been real statesmen and real warriors in Hitler's day. Hitler stepped up to fill a void because he cared too much for his people. He was willing to sacrifice himself for his people, something that too few were willing to do.
Toast message