I've heard the jew side of the story endlessly. I want to hear the Nazi side of the story.
I understand the punitive nature of the treaty of Versillies, the loss of territory and hyperinflation. Based on that it seems reasonable thet Nazi Germany would break the treaty. Maybe even taking back the territory in Poland. But what was the justification for pushing further into Poland? And for the invasion of France? The way I see it the French had adopted a defensive posture at that point, as evidenced by the Maginot line. Why did the the Germans invade?
Also wondering what the justification for betraying the Russians was? I don't buy the jew argument which just says that Hitler thought the Russians would be easy to defeat due to their racial inferiority.
This I think is a must-read: [What really happened after WWI](https://communities.win/c/ConsumeProduct/p/1ARK54TJi4/what-really-happened-since-the-e/c)
To understand the role of Poland in starting WWII: [The jews used Poland to provoke Germany to start a war](https://communities.win/c/ConsumeProduct/p/1ARdVyr2JU/the-jews-used-poland-to-provoke-/c)
This one you need to understand - it is the *reason* why they were so aggressive against Germany: [The jewish finance system and why it's of highest importance to them](https://communities.win/c/ConsumeProduct/p/1ARcz4VFDk/the-jewish-finance-system-and-wh/c)
And after understanding the context, what was the [Holocaust](https://communities.win/c/ConsumeProduct/p/1ARdVyoqJv/holocaust/c) really? It was atrocity propaganda that gave them tremendous power, influence and money (still today).
> But what was the justification for pushing further into Poland?
Poland was quite small before WWI. The territory taken from Germany was like half of Poland's territory after WWI. I don't think they took more than what belonged to Germany. Remember, the Soviets also came and took their half.
Otherwise Poland had to be dismantled - it was an enemy and had to be taken out.
> And for the invasion of France?
France would have turned against Germany soon after they were forced to start the war. Aside from that:
"France declared war on Germany on September 3, 1939, two days after Germany invaded Poland, honoring its defense treaty with Poland, which triggered the start of World War II in Europe alongside Great Britain."
The alternative would have been to let France attack Germany after months of war preparations, leading to casualties of German civilians. Germany didn't rape their way through France like the US niggers and the Soviets did - they rather liberated it and wanted France to stay French. Compare with the imported migrants - they convert France into the shithole.
> Also wondering what the justification for betraying the Russians was?
It was clear to Germans that the Soviets were a major threat to the entirety of Europe. As evidence by them conquering half of Europe later on, their intent was to conquer ALL of Europe once the "Capitalists" exhausted themselves through war. That was the reason why they helped Hitler against Poland initially, to get things rolling. Hitler knew that.
The Germans were continually suspicious of the Soviets. They didn't have an alliance, it was just a pact. The Germans estimated that the Soviets were roughly 3 weeks apart from starting a war, so they decided to attack first, with major success. It was clear to them that it was only a matter of time - and they were right. You could argue it wasn't the case, but that's hindsight.
> I don't buy the jew argument which just says that Hitler thought the Russians would be easy to defeat due to their racial inferiority.
Good. Because that racial stuff is vastly overblown, and it appeals to Americans so much because they are inundated with niggers and the obsession to appease them with welfare and "equality." So there is a sensibility there which makes them extremely receptive to it.