1 month ago-1 points(+0/-0/-1Score on mirror)1 child
Well, it's less than 1%. Assuming the yellow lines mean 3 generations ("great grandchild"), red and blue mean 1, the distance to Abu al-Qasim is 36 generations. It means the genetic descent is 0.5^36 = 1.5e-11, which is 0.000000002% sandnigger. This is assuming 50% genetics descend from each parent.
And for the sandnigger Muhammad it's ~50 generations even. So we're talking about 8.9e-16, which is 0.000000000000089%. I have no idea what my descendants are at that distance. There is a chance I might be related to Genghis Khan even.
You just want to be an annoying, nitpicking retard. Go fuck off.
It's a matter of magnitude. The reason it is indirect is because it is so diluted that over time the amount of parents across 50 generations becomes 2 ^ 50 = 1125899906842624. Do you understand what that means? Even if we assume it's just 30 generations, it's still 2 ^ 30 = 1073741824.
We both, just as most White people, are very likely to have common ancestors from 2000 years ago. So clearly that doesn't mean much, because look at you going.
> Indirect would be if
I reject that definition. It's shallow and pointless.
1 month ago-1 points(+0/-0/-1Score on mirror)1 child
Am I the retard? You make up your own meaning for words. How are we supposed to communicate when you behave like an illiterate nigger where words can mean whatever the fuck you think they should mean?
1 month ago-1 points(+0/-0/-1Score on mirror)1 child
> Am I the retard?
Yes. The concept of heritability seems to overwhelm you to a degree you desperately cling to definitions like a lifesaver. I mentioned that word casually to indicate an extreme level of genetic dilution. And you harp on it like a massive faggot.
I didn't know how sacrosanct that word is to people like you. Namely imbeciles.
And for the sandnigger Muhammad it's ~50 generations even. So we're talking about 8.9e-16, which is 0.000000000000089%. I have no idea what my descendants are at that distance. There is a chance I might be related to Genghis Khan even.
So that's indirect enough.
It's still direct relation, direct descendance. Indirect would be if she was cousin or distant cousin of the sandnigger Muhammed.
It's a matter of magnitude. The reason it is indirect is because it is so diluted that over time the amount of parents across 50 generations becomes 2 ^ 50 = 1125899906842624. Do you understand what that means? Even if we assume it's just 30 generations, it's still 2 ^ 30 = 1073741824.
We both, just as most White people, are very likely to have common ancestors from 2000 years ago. So clearly that doesn't mean much, because look at you going.
> Indirect would be if
I reject that definition. It's shallow and pointless.
Yes. The concept of heritability seems to overwhelm you to a degree you desperately cling to definitions like a lifesaver. I mentioned that word casually to indicate an extreme level of genetic dilution. And you harp on it like a massive faggot.
I didn't know how sacrosanct that word is to people like you. Namely imbeciles.
> How are we supposed to communicate
Shut up and fuck off, that's how.