Queen Elizabeth related to Prophet Muhammed
(media.scored.co)
False prophet*
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
19 comments:
12
1 month ago
12 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+12Score on mirror
)
1 child
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
7
1 month ago
7 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+7Score on mirror
)
1 child
Demon possessed, child molesting false prophet
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
3
1 month ago
3 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+3Score on mirror
)
Demon possessed, child molesting, mass murderer, warlord, illiterate, camel piss drinking, rapist, Christ denying, sand nigger, false prophet
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
This chart will be included in British grade school history books if the White man does not wake up now.
Ugh, you are right. What a shame to be descended from some sandniggers, even if very indirectly.
What is indirectly about it?
Well, it's less than 1%. Assuming the yellow lines mean 3 generations ("great grandchild"), red and blue mean 1, the distance to Abu al-Qasim is 36 generations. It means the genetic descent is 0.5^36 = 1.5e-11, which is 0.000000002% sandnigger. This is assuming 50% genetics descend from each parent.
And for the sandnigger Muhammad it's ~50 generations even. So we're talking about 8.9e-16, which is 0.000000000000089%. I have no idea what my descendants are at that distance. There is a chance I might be related to Genghis Khan even.
So that's indirect enough.
And for the sandnigger Muhammad it's ~50 generations even. So we're talking about 8.9e-16, which is 0.000000000000089%. I have no idea what my descendants are at that distance. There is a chance I might be related to Genghis Khan even.
So that's indirect enough.
That's a lot of text to explain that you don't know what the word indirectly means.
It's still direct relation, direct descendance. Indirect would be if she was cousin or distant cousin of the sandnigger Muhammed.
It's still direct relation, direct descendance. Indirect would be if she was cousin or distant cousin of the sandnigger Muhammed.
You just want to be an annoying, nitpicking retard. Go fuck off.
It's a matter of magnitude. The reason it is indirect is because it is so diluted that over time the amount of parents across 50 generations becomes 2 ^ 50 = 1125899906842624. Do you understand what that means? Even if we assume it's just 30 generations, it's still 2 ^ 30 = 1073741824.
We both, just as most White people, are very likely to have common ancestors from 2000 years ago. So clearly that doesn't mean much, because look at you going.
> Indirect would be if
I reject that definition. It's shallow and pointless.
It's a matter of magnitude. The reason it is indirect is because it is so diluted that over time the amount of parents across 50 generations becomes 2 ^ 50 = 1125899906842624. Do you understand what that means? Even if we assume it's just 30 generations, it's still 2 ^ 30 = 1073741824.
We both, just as most White people, are very likely to have common ancestors from 2000 years ago. So clearly that doesn't mean much, because look at you going.
> Indirect would be if
I reject that definition. It's shallow and pointless.
Toast message