From the Horse's Mouth.
(media.scored.co)
Everytime someone uses the phrase “full stop” I know they deserve the rope
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
5 comments:
11
2 days ago
11 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+11Score on mirror
)
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
This notion of abortion as a religious right that social conservatism violates is why I think that everyone's understanding of religion, e.g. Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Mandaeism, Ba'hai, sharing a common heritage and sharing common ground, on the one hand, against all of the other religions and/or philosophies of the world, is ultimately gravely mistaken.
I have *never* seen any Christian, Muslim, Ba'hai, Buddhist, Hindu, Confucian, Taoist, etc. argue that abortion is a religious right.
Kikes, on the other hand, are suspiciously and completely out of sync with *everyone else.*
Thus the correct conception of religion is more like: everyone standing together on one side, the kikes standing alone on the other, using their well-honed skills of deception and mind-muddling to convince people on the other side that they are actually on the same side as the kikes when they really aren't.
Islam and even Confucianism are far closer to Christianity on moral issues than tapewormism is. When foreigners such as the Jesuits and Catholics first entered into Korea bringing things such as the Bible, Korean Confucians observed that the main differences between them were on the question of God's true nature. As opposed to Christianity, China/Korea/Confucianism conceives of God as 1) more impersonal, 2) less of a creator, and 3) more of an active governor/interventionist, as evidenced, for example, by the famous concept of the Heavenly Mandate (tianming). (Japan's conception of God is more personal, the Emperor traditionally being considered a descendant of a god.) But said Korean Confucians observed that these foreigners had largely compatible morals. Thus a handful of Korean Confucians such as Tasan were essentially Christo-Confucians of sorts.
Contrast that with the kikes: the Korean Confucians and these foreign Catholics and Jesuits clearly stand together on one side while the kikes and their grossly offensive, twisted version of morality stand together - alongside no other religion, only alongside modern political ideologies - on the other.
But modern Christians will argue until they're black and blue that they stand together with the kikes against everyone else. 'Judeo-Christianity', right? How so? No one seems to posit that abortion is a religious right but kikes. Practically everyone is closer to me than those who would make such a ridiculous argument, that it is God Himself who sanctified such filth, with which no one else agrees.
I have *never* seen any Christian, Muslim, Ba'hai, Buddhist, Hindu, Confucian, Taoist, etc. argue that abortion is a religious right.
Kikes, on the other hand, are suspiciously and completely out of sync with *everyone else.*
Thus the correct conception of religion is more like: everyone standing together on one side, the kikes standing alone on the other, using their well-honed skills of deception and mind-muddling to convince people on the other side that they are actually on the same side as the kikes when they really aren't.
Islam and even Confucianism are far closer to Christianity on moral issues than tapewormism is. When foreigners such as the Jesuits and Catholics first entered into Korea bringing things such as the Bible, Korean Confucians observed that the main differences between them were on the question of God's true nature. As opposed to Christianity, China/Korea/Confucianism conceives of God as 1) more impersonal, 2) less of a creator, and 3) more of an active governor/interventionist, as evidenced, for example, by the famous concept of the Heavenly Mandate (tianming). (Japan's conception of God is more personal, the Emperor traditionally being considered a descendant of a god.) But said Korean Confucians observed that these foreigners had largely compatible morals. Thus a handful of Korean Confucians such as Tasan were essentially Christo-Confucians of sorts.
Contrast that with the kikes: the Korean Confucians and these foreign Catholics and Jesuits clearly stand together on one side while the kikes and their grossly offensive, twisted version of morality stand together - alongside no other religion, only alongside modern political ideologies - on the other.
But modern Christians will argue until they're black and blue that they stand together with the kikes against everyone else. 'Judeo-Christianity', right? How so? No one seems to posit that abortion is a religious right but kikes. Practically everyone is closer to me than those who would make such a ridiculous argument, that it is God Himself who sanctified such filth, with which no one else agrees.
funny thing that in israel they require a council of rabbis and "health experts" if a woman is PERMITTED to murder her unborn judling
though this is just for the secular jew
the volcano demon worshipping Hasidic community considers abortion as full on murder and wholly excommunicates anyone who's even thinking such things, let alone going through with it
[the american kike who fully gets behind abortion is probably the most idealist pro-lifer in israel](https://pomf2.lain.la/f/km3ue0r.jpeg)
though this is just for the secular jew
the volcano demon worshipping Hasidic community considers abortion as full on murder and wholly excommunicates anyone who's even thinking such things, let alone going through with it
[the american kike who fully gets behind abortion is probably the most idealist pro-lifer in israel](https://pomf2.lain.la/f/km3ue0r.jpeg)
Toast message