You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
19
LGBTQIAIDS on scored.co
2 days ago19 points(+0/-0/+19Score on mirror)
Doug Wilson and Will Spencer are both yids. Yids completely control the so-called Christian nationalist movement in America.
Remember the gargoylean, ghastly, ghoulish, grotesque, gross Laura Loomer saying she'd defend 'Christian nationalism' in her election campaign?
Yids will defend any kind of idea at all that benefits them and oppose any kind of idea at all that disbenefits them. Yids will climb the ranks of, control, and manage any kind of social group that they can get control of and will, from those positions of power, implode from within any kind of social group that they are losing control of. That's their ethnocentrism and ant- or bee-like synchrony at work.
Of course Loomer and other yids would defend that kind of 'Christian nationalism'. She wouldn't defend it if it wasn't theirs. She still goes on about a supposed 'Nazi problem' in America and so on, which proves that she had no serious conversion away from yiddish ethnocentrism.
Yids must have too much trouble denying the USS Liberty incident. Saying that the USS Liberty incident happened but was good for America is probably dead on arrival. Thus they skip that and move to the third possible position: the USS Liberty incident happened, it was bad for America, and it is good that it was bad for America, because America deserved it.
The good news for whoever cares about this is that that's the yid's *last* line of defence: if the idiot masses can get it through their thick skulls that Wilson and others making this argument are wrong, then they will arrive at the 'anti-Semitic' truth: the USS Liberty incident happened, it was bad for America, and it is bad that it was bad for America, because America did *not* deserve it.
Once you've pushed the yid back to this point, you just need to push him back from this last ditch defence. After that, 'anti-semitism' has *won* the argument, i.e. the State of Israel is not the 'greatest ally' at the very least because it destroyed one of our ships, whose destruction was neither beneficial to us nor deserved.
In other words, the yid just needs to be beaten on the point of whether America deserved it or not, because he has already lost the rest of the argument.
Remember the gargoylean, ghastly, ghoulish, grotesque, gross Laura Loomer saying she'd defend 'Christian nationalism' in her election campaign?
Yids will defend any kind of idea at all that benefits them and oppose any kind of idea at all that disbenefits them. Yids will climb the ranks of, control, and manage any kind of social group that they can get control of and will, from those positions of power, implode from within any kind of social group that they are losing control of. That's their ethnocentrism and ant- or bee-like synchrony at work.
Of course Loomer and other yids would defend that kind of 'Christian nationalism'. She wouldn't defend it if it wasn't theirs. She still goes on about a supposed 'Nazi problem' in America and so on, which proves that she had no serious conversion away from yiddish ethnocentrism.
Yids must have too much trouble denying the USS Liberty incident. Saying that the USS Liberty incident happened but was good for America is probably dead on arrival. Thus they skip that and move to the third possible position: the USS Liberty incident happened, it was bad for America, and it is good that it was bad for America, because America deserved it.
The good news for whoever cares about this is that that's the yid's *last* line of defence: if the idiot masses can get it through their thick skulls that Wilson and others making this argument are wrong, then they will arrive at the 'anti-Semitic' truth: the USS Liberty incident happened, it was bad for America, and it is bad that it was bad for America, because America did *not* deserve it.
Once you've pushed the yid back to this point, you just need to push him back from this last ditch defence. After that, 'anti-semitism' has *won* the argument, i.e. the State of Israel is not the 'greatest ally' at the very least because it destroyed one of our ships, whose destruction was neither beneficial to us nor deserved.
In other words, the yid just needs to be beaten on the point of whether America deserved it or not, because he has already lost the rest of the argument.