They've always spied. Now they're building evidence that you consented.
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
55 comments:
My grandmother bragged about spying when she was a telephone operator.
It’s beyond disturbing for those of us who’ve been talking about Technocracy and Agenda 21 for the last couple decades, warning people about issues like what OP brought up, and the surveillance cams we see popping up all throughout public spaces in society, cams that we are paying for with our tax dollars and were never told what their purpose is. We’ve been trying to warn the masses that they’re building a digital enslavement grid for years and nobody seems to care or believe what their own eyes can easily see. It’s enraging, like how can people be this retarded? Our own government is talking about digital ID, while we see digital ID being forced on the entire world, and it’s like nobody is concerned enough to ask what that’s all about, or what it means when dozens of governments are forcing digital ID on their citizens, global governance is here already.
I’ll be honest, it was Alex Jones who first put me in opposition to all of the Agenda 21 and Technocracy stuff way back, he introduced me to Rosa Koire and she blew my mind, then I learned about technocracy and China’s social credit score, which was being beta tested on a compliant chink population so jews could patch any issues it might have before they force it on the western world.….Now as the final key features of the enslavement grid are being built and implemented, Alex Jones has nothing to say about any of the Agenda 21 technocracy stuff. I guess if Alex still talked about this threat, he’d be forced to admit it’s a uni-party in Congress and there’s no voting our way out of it, and he’d also be forced to admit Trump and Elon are just as much the enemy as the rest of the players in this jew subverted system, which would really get in the way of him selling the idea that it’s just democrats and the ChiComs trying to enslave everyone.
Bill Cooper was right about Alex, which is why Fed’s murdered Bill and allowed Alex to grow into a household name, they were installing their shill who would be there decades later to steer the narrative once everybody lost faith in corporate MSM, which jews knew would happen eventually as the lies had to get bigger and bigger on the run up to JWO.
Obviously Alex is a shill, but ever since the JQ got popularized, it’s hard to tell who is trustworthy anymore. The old litmus test about content creators and their willingness to talk about jews is no longer a full proof way of identifying a shill, there are definitely shills who talk about jews nowadays, they just don’t tell you that you’re about to be enslaved in an open-air digital prison, they’ll put your attention on less important issues, they’ll pretend you have time to infiltrate the system and take over from within, they’ll avoid saying anything that grows public opposition to the digital ID policy, they’ll push people away from organizing IRL to fight back, very much like Nick Fuentes.
I’ll be honest, it was Alex Jones who first put me in opposition to all of the Agenda 21 and Technocracy stuff way back, he introduced me to Rosa Koire and she blew my mind, then I learned about technocracy and China’s social credit score, which was being beta tested on a compliant chink population so jews could patch any issues it might have before they force it on the western world.….Now as the final key features of the enslavement grid are being built and implemented, Alex Jones has nothing to say about any of the Agenda 21 technocracy stuff. I guess if Alex still talked about this threat, he’d be forced to admit it’s a uni-party in Congress and there’s no voting our way out of it, and he’d also be forced to admit Trump and Elon are just as much the enemy as the rest of the players in this jew subverted system, which would really get in the way of him selling the idea that it’s just democrats and the ChiComs trying to enslave everyone.
Bill Cooper was right about Alex, which is why Fed’s murdered Bill and allowed Alex to grow into a household name, they were installing their shill who would be there decades later to steer the narrative once everybody lost faith in corporate MSM, which jews knew would happen eventually as the lies had to get bigger and bigger on the run up to JWO.
Obviously Alex is a shill, but ever since the JQ got popularized, it’s hard to tell who is trustworthy anymore. The old litmus test about content creators and their willingness to talk about jews is no longer a full proof way of identifying a shill, there are definitely shills who talk about jews nowadays, they just don’t tell you that you’re about to be enslaved in an open-air digital prison, they’ll put your attention on less important issues, they’ll pretend you have time to infiltrate the system and take over from within, they’ll avoid saying anything that grows public opposition to the digital ID policy, they’ll push people away from organizing IRL to fight back, very much like Nick Fuentes.
Fuentes is fine. Youre a dumbshit if you think Nick is in bed with jews.
And when I try to make an X account, I get this:
We were unable to confirm you're human. Please try again. g;176593673496868338:-1765938008874:6uf36paSxoEPklLdyUWe0cKm:0
We were unable to confirm you're human. Please try again. g;176593673496868338:-1765938008874:6uf36paSxoEPklLdyUWe0cKm:0
Move away from Google products. Goolag and the equivalent need to die.
https://www.privacytools.io/
SurfShark VPN has a full alternate persona (fake name, address, etc) you can create with a working phone number for $20 a year. I use this service.
https://surfshark.com/
https://www.privacytools.io/
SurfShark VPN has a full alternate persona (fake name, address, etc) you can create with a working phone number for $20 a year. I use this service.
https://surfshark.com/
I'm not a fan of the "alternative persona" because in theory that specific persona can then be traced back specifically to your account and then potentially you.
I actually use surfshark but when signing up for X, it won't accept a connection that is behind surfshark to register. It wants you to register with your actual IP Address ofc so it's logged and always traced to your account.
Good recommendation on privacytools.io. It has some good stuff. I wish more people used Session for a messenger.
I actually use surfshark but when signing up for X, it won't accept a connection that is behind surfshark to register. It wants you to register with your actual IP Address ofc so it's logged and always traced to your account.
Good recommendation on privacytools.io. It has some good stuff. I wish more people used Session for a messenger.
It's all email. Proton won't let you make one on a VPN. They want you to confirm with a phone number or another email. Tutanota is similar. There is no such thing as a private email that I know of.
You can get a burner phone. Oh wait, you are on camera from every store. If you pay for things, it better be coinjoined Bitcoin or Montero. Make sure you understand chain analytics.
Use Linux.. but be sure you don't have Intel or AMD. They have special keylogging software at the base level.
I tell my friend that is trying to be very discreet. These fuckers have you at every level. The best you can do is talk on code using simple x on your phone.
You can get a burner phone. Oh wait, you are on camera from every store. If you pay for things, it better be coinjoined Bitcoin or Montero. Make sure you understand chain analytics.
Use Linux.. but be sure you don't have Intel or AMD. They have special keylogging software at the base level.
I tell my friend that is trying to be very discreet. These fuckers have you at every level. The best you can do is talk on code using simple x on your phone.
I would use protonmail or some other service for sure.
Protonmail requires another email to be able to use protonmail as an account verification email to websites like X, nearly defeating protonmail's purpose. I'm using atomicmail at the moment.
I wouldn’t sign up for some yahoo thing and Apple forced me to put a passcode on my phone that I already “owned” for 2 years and the only way to bypass it is to put in my information.
Ehhhh, it’ll just open up the market for other better options. Why do you want a gmail anyway? There are other good options out there.
Pretty much Outlook and Mail.com are the only ones which don't require a phone these days, and if you don't login to Mail.com for 6 months they irrecoverably delete your account.
Outlook needs a second email which makes it worthless.
Yeah, luckily I had a Gmail and Google Voice from before they banned using other VOIPs from registering accounts.
But you can still use another mail provider which doesn't require it, which is what I used to create the email I use for this username. There are still a few out there.
But you can still use another mail provider which doesn't require it, which is what I used to create the email I use for this username. There are still a few out there.
Gmail has been trashy for a while
I've heard self-hosting email has become more difficult
Granted I think email is still used but has diminished in importance, if that is possibly a good thing
I've heard self-hosting email has become more difficult
Granted I think email is still used but has diminished in importance, if that is possibly a good thing
Do you like when scammers can just create thousands and thousands of accounts to spam from?
Yes. Spammers have never bothered me. It's an excuse these companies are using to get around your privacy.
Ah scammers, you are right. Let's strip me of all privacy then!
why should google fucking give you an email account? that's the honey pot itself, you fucking idiot. they give you an email so they can read all your emails, stupid asshole. they don't need your ID, if you're using it for anything semi important, you are already giving away your information to google, so stop pretending it's a secure platform to begin with.
The are multiple levels of intrusion. As of right now, they have minimal information about me. They don't know where I live, who I am, what my phone number is, what my name is.
Aside from that, your argument was that its purpose is to combat spammers/scammers. First of all, they can create e-mails from any account. As far I remember you could even send e-mails from your PC itself - you just need some kind of storage/server to receive them especially in times where your computer is not running. Second, you can just acquire cheap fake phone numbers. Third, you can literally give fake e-mail addresses.
I've seen what e-mails are. They are just some XML or HTML format, and the entire system is built on trust - trusting that whatever is in the e-mail code is correct. The receiving e-mail server doesn't do any verification check of the e-mail sent either - how could it? Only by asking the sending e-mail server (if existing) if it has a record of an e-mail being sent, and a checksum of its content. But that's not part of how e-mails work - there is no shared protocol either.
Maybe something has changed over the past years, and only *some* e-mail providers adapted it, but the actual standard is the barebone minimum necessary to make it work.
You could replace the entire e-mail system with a modern, secure, foolproof system. But it would be a new system.
Aside from that, your argument was that its purpose is to combat spammers/scammers. First of all, they can create e-mails from any account. As far I remember you could even send e-mails from your PC itself - you just need some kind of storage/server to receive them especially in times where your computer is not running. Second, you can just acquire cheap fake phone numbers. Third, you can literally give fake e-mail addresses.
I've seen what e-mails are. They are just some XML or HTML format, and the entire system is built on trust - trusting that whatever is in the e-mail code is correct. The receiving e-mail server doesn't do any verification check of the e-mail sent either - how could it? Only by asking the sending e-mail server (if existing) if it has a record of an e-mail being sent, and a checksum of its content. But that's not part of how e-mails work - there is no shared protocol either.
Maybe something has changed over the past years, and only *some* e-mail providers adapted it, but the actual standard is the barebone minimum necessary to make it work.
You could replace the entire e-mail system with a modern, secure, foolproof system. But it would be a new system.
Toast message
If you logged into your e-mail on your phone, it means the thief has access to your account and you don't. You can't even change the password without the phone, but with the phone you can read and send e-mail without needing the password.
They've actually created a new security vulnerability because of this phone requirement.
It's time for google to die.