Lol a I'm spic now? We have a fuck tonnes of almost every race here but I've literally only ever met 2 spics (a mother and baby and the father was in Mexico) in my life. The least White part of my whole bloodline is small part of pure Hungarian BTW, and it's also Mrs.
Tell me why you refuse to believe that image is AI? Because you believe the narrative of it was a hoax or psy op etc? You can believe the event was fake, that what is generated in that image was probably close to reality and that the image was fake too.
I saw footage of someone walking across that bridge today with no visible blood stains or bullet marks, the Channel 9 interview with the bald kike looks like randomly poured fake blood on his face under a bandage which if you are gonna bandage someone (heaps of ambos attened so likely done by a paramedic) any person who is smart enough to have a first aid kit with bandages knows to clean the wound first and why not clean the face as well for humane reasons and to check for further injuries properly? Pointing out an image is obviously fake when you look really closely does not mean anything deeper than that. That scene might have happened, I and others are happy to entertain that but the kikeish thing to do is to spread the disprovable fake image as fact so others can point and laugh when you try to say it was a psy op and call you an idiot for falling for fake stuff. If it's fake, find the real evidence. Spreading fake evidence damages the cause, not helps it.
That's not what I asked you. I asked you if you're a qualified photographer with understanding of lighting, lenses, etc. And post production like photoshop, and file formats? Just because you have eyes doesn't mean you can see everything.
Tell me why you refuse to believe that image is AI? Because you believe the narrative of it was a hoax or psy op etc? You can believe the event was fake, that what is generated in that image was probably close to reality and that the image was fake too.
I saw footage of someone walking across that bridge today with no visible blood stains or bullet marks, the Channel 9 interview with the bald kike looks like randomly poured fake blood on his face under a bandage which if you are gonna bandage someone (heaps of ambos attened so likely done by a paramedic) any person who is smart enough to have a first aid kit with bandages knows to clean the wound first and why not clean the face as well for humane reasons and to check for further injuries properly? Pointing out an image is obviously fake when you look really closely does not mean anything deeper than that. That scene might have happened, I and others are happy to entertain that but the kikeish thing to do is to spread the disprovable fake image as fact so others can point and laugh when you try to say it was a psy op and call you an idiot for falling for fake stuff. If it's fake, find the real evidence. Spreading fake evidence damages the cause, not helps it.
Are you a photographer with decades of experience?