This picture was taken on an adroie phone which different from a reflex or full frame camera with decent lenses IG had a single focus point which explains your waterbottles being slightly out of focus because the shot was focused on the two people in the middle. Even tough the EXIF data was edited to remove identifying data that could link it to the photographer enough was left to deduce q lot from the picture. Plus have you ever heard of jpeg rot? Unfortunately jpeg is lossy format that removes pixels to reduce the file size which makes for low quality images. Finally, check the link at the top response, this same guy served as a crisis actor on Oct 7 attack.
11 days ago-3 points(+0/-0/-3Score on mirror)2 children
There are no brushes on this picture, just grass, and it looks photographically fine. Man I've been photographing since I was a kid, and messing with Photoshop since version 2.0 I don't need AI to detect AI or normal fakeness in pictures. I think you're seeing too much on what we call jpeg rot.
11 days ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
Now explain the dude's left leg, the woman's pocket going in the wrong direction, the vehicular blob in the back, and the other dude in the back's right leg and left hand. Seriously, he looks like he only has one leg and a ball for a hand. You can see grass where you'd expect there to be leg, but because AI can't object permanence you see grass where you'd expect skin (around the woman's hair).
This image has so much wrong with it you don't even need AI to tell you it's AI. I could probably point out another two paragraphs of inconsistencies without issue.
11 days ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
Most of what you said are optical illusions due to lens distortions or compression artifacts on a low resolution picture at 72DPI. And as I said before those are two badly parked cars in parallel.
11 days ago7 points(+0/-0/+7Score on mirror)1 child
That site says "quite sure" with a smiling man emoji in green.. that's not quite the same as 100% sure. I'll have to try a few more sites.
Out of 6 sites, 4 said almost certainly real, 2 said almost certainly fake, that shows me these sites aren't reliable since there was no in-between. I think the image is real based on my eyeballs.
Dude. We have been back and forth all day and we are unable to figure out whether its ai or not. And i run with some of the wall autists. Will include some photos https://postimg.cc/gallery/fJBXXPm
11 days ago3 points(+0/-0/+3Score on mirror)1 child
We shouldn't, but people here tend to take their content off of other areas (usually twitter or 4chan) so they tend to screenshot content and post it here without thinking twice.
The real question is "are the people posting this AI slop just braindead retards? Or are they posting it in hopes that other braindead retards willing to lick it up without question?" Either way, it's a bad look when this shit gets posted here.
Light and flashes are used in daytime to reduce shadows produced by the sun thus making light more uniform. Usually those would be used in a production where they can prepare everything to make perfect shots. Interestingly you uncovered yet another psyop proof.
https://scored.co/c/Conspiracies/p/1ARdHx6AQX/
They're getting extra lazy.
Edit: his name is [Arsen Ostrovsky](https://www.jpost.com/diaspora/antisemitism/article-880260)