From a young age I was prepared for the world to be evil and cruel
(media.scored.co)
Don’t forget niggered.
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
7 comments:
5
12 days ago
5 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+5Score on mirror
)
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
An utterly evil, cruel, gay, and retarded world basically sums up the last few centuries, especially since the so-called Enlightenment.
Only in the past few years has it even remotely felt like this process is starting to be threatened by a deep declinism, despair, and uncertainty that sees older, liberal triumphalist and exceptionalist narratives like Fukuyama's End of History thesis thrown out the window. Now Fukuyama despairs that the nebulous phenomenon of 'populism' will eventually destroy liberal democracy.
Before the past few years, the world was becoming more evil, cruel, gay, and retarded, and somehow managed to be *happy* about it. We had the ideal political culture, values, and the ideal political system, they said. Thus the world will be like this *forever.* Liberalism won over its last ideological opponent with the end of the Cold War and it will never face any new challengers. Vote for the red guy or the blue guy until extinction.
I thought to myself: I hope that the likes of Fukuyama are wrong, but it is too soon to tell whether they might not be right. It would be horrible if they were right, because nobody to whom I am close likes this very much.
That happiness or joy of triumph over the opponents of liberal democracy seems to be ebbing away in the world. Everyone now agrees that things are bad, we do not need to convince anyone of that: the problem now is that large numbers of people think that doubling down on making the world even more evil, cruel, gay, and retarded will make them happy again. Drinking more of this poison won't lead anywhere except to an exacerbation of the symptoms that they desperately wish were alleviated.
Change is stifled when people are contented. Discontent begets change. I hope that the 'Far-Right' can grow and steer the ship of discontent in the right direction, for the simple reason that everyone else simply offers some kind of different iteration of the same problem.
'Let's go back to 1950s or 1980s liberalism and try to hold it there', say the Trumptards. As though you can simply freeze liberalism in time before it becomes too intolerable. 'Let us go forward', say the Left, as though all this did not happen under their watch and as though they would bring about anything but an exacerbation of the problems.
Today I think: The likes of Fukuyama may well still be correct in the long run, but when he himself has given up on these views, that is encouraging. A major liberal exceptionalist and trumphalist has succumbed to declinism and despair. How is that not a good thing? If he no longer believes in it, why should I?
Indeed, I suspect that the liberal democratic consensus is already crumbling. Look at British politics. It used to take 10 years or so before enough people became incensed at the Thatcherite Tories and Blairite Labour. People are already incensed with Starmerite Labour before they can even make it to the end of a single term. He is 'speed running' in four years what previously took ten or twelve years.
Look at American politics. It used to be that people could tolerate two or even three consecutive terms of a party and/or president, e.g. the Republicans for the 12-year period 1980-1992. Now it seems that they can only stomach one four-year term before they find things intolerable.
Clearly, there is discontent, and change is coming. Things are reaching a psychological breaking point. Optimism, hope, and certainty are eroding. Whites are taking refuge everywhere: in escapism of all kinds, in foreign countries of all kinds, in voting more and more (America notably excluded) for minor political parties and independents, in dumping television and the surface social media sites. They are afraid to even speak their mind, mulling over this potential consequence and that potential consequence.
All of these behaviours and others stem from the same discontent and uncertainty. They are exceedingly distrusting of the mass media that their parents absorbed like a sponge, of the hegemonic political parties that their parents voted all their lives for. Distrusting even of their own country's exceptionalism. No longer does it seem like winning the World Wars or the Cold War was some great victory. The supposedly Enlightened West wasn't so right after all.
This is the environment in which change thrives. I have looked deeply at these things for twelve years; I am less 'blackpilled' now than at any previous point. Of course, things have not yet reversed course, but it seems like the decline is plateauing. Sure, we have plenty of idiots still going on about how evil Nazism is and how good yids are and other such mainstream things, but more and more it seems like people don't even agree on these postwar consensus fundamentals. It seems only a matter of time before the type of idiots who go on stage to talk about 'our greatest ally', 'the only democracy in the Middle East', or Genesis 12:3 find themselves booed and laughed off the decreasing number of stages that they can climb on.
It seems more and more like campaigning on continuity and preserving the status quo is just not politically viable, and thus that even establishment politicians need to put on a 'populist' veneer, like Britain's Robert 'Jew-Wife' Jenrick, who, despite letting in many immigrants when he was the relevant minister, recently attended anti-immigration protests. Even the most establishment politicians, those with their yid spouses like Starmer and Jenrick, can see that everything is screwed - under their watch - and that they need to fake being outsiders who want change if they want to remain politically viable. They wouldn't see even the remotest need to do that if everything that I have written here is false.
Only in the past few years has it even remotely felt like this process is starting to be threatened by a deep declinism, despair, and uncertainty that sees older, liberal triumphalist and exceptionalist narratives like Fukuyama's End of History thesis thrown out the window. Now Fukuyama despairs that the nebulous phenomenon of 'populism' will eventually destroy liberal democracy.
Before the past few years, the world was becoming more evil, cruel, gay, and retarded, and somehow managed to be *happy* about it. We had the ideal political culture, values, and the ideal political system, they said. Thus the world will be like this *forever.* Liberalism won over its last ideological opponent with the end of the Cold War and it will never face any new challengers. Vote for the red guy or the blue guy until extinction.
I thought to myself: I hope that the likes of Fukuyama are wrong, but it is too soon to tell whether they might not be right. It would be horrible if they were right, because nobody to whom I am close likes this very much.
That happiness or joy of triumph over the opponents of liberal democracy seems to be ebbing away in the world. Everyone now agrees that things are bad, we do not need to convince anyone of that: the problem now is that large numbers of people think that doubling down on making the world even more evil, cruel, gay, and retarded will make them happy again. Drinking more of this poison won't lead anywhere except to an exacerbation of the symptoms that they desperately wish were alleviated.
Change is stifled when people are contented. Discontent begets change. I hope that the 'Far-Right' can grow and steer the ship of discontent in the right direction, for the simple reason that everyone else simply offers some kind of different iteration of the same problem.
'Let's go back to 1950s or 1980s liberalism and try to hold it there', say the Trumptards. As though you can simply freeze liberalism in time before it becomes too intolerable. 'Let us go forward', say the Left, as though all this did not happen under their watch and as though they would bring about anything but an exacerbation of the problems.
Today I think: The likes of Fukuyama may well still be correct in the long run, but when he himself has given up on these views, that is encouraging. A major liberal exceptionalist and trumphalist has succumbed to declinism and despair. How is that not a good thing? If he no longer believes in it, why should I?
Indeed, I suspect that the liberal democratic consensus is already crumbling. Look at British politics. It used to take 10 years or so before enough people became incensed at the Thatcherite Tories and Blairite Labour. People are already incensed with Starmerite Labour before they can even make it to the end of a single term. He is 'speed running' in four years what previously took ten or twelve years.
Look at American politics. It used to be that people could tolerate two or even three consecutive terms of a party and/or president, e.g. the Republicans for the 12-year period 1980-1992. Now it seems that they can only stomach one four-year term before they find things intolerable.
Clearly, there is discontent, and change is coming. Things are reaching a psychological breaking point. Optimism, hope, and certainty are eroding. Whites are taking refuge everywhere: in escapism of all kinds, in foreign countries of all kinds, in voting more and more (America notably excluded) for minor political parties and independents, in dumping television and the surface social media sites. They are afraid to even speak their mind, mulling over this potential consequence and that potential consequence.
All of these behaviours and others stem from the same discontent and uncertainty. They are exceedingly distrusting of the mass media that their parents absorbed like a sponge, of the hegemonic political parties that their parents voted all their lives for. Distrusting even of their own country's exceptionalism. No longer does it seem like winning the World Wars or the Cold War was some great victory. The supposedly Enlightened West wasn't so right after all.
This is the environment in which change thrives. I have looked deeply at these things for twelve years; I am less 'blackpilled' now than at any previous point. Of course, things have not yet reversed course, but it seems like the decline is plateauing. Sure, we have plenty of idiots still going on about how evil Nazism is and how good yids are and other such mainstream things, but more and more it seems like people don't even agree on these postwar consensus fundamentals. It seems only a matter of time before the type of idiots who go on stage to talk about 'our greatest ally', 'the only democracy in the Middle East', or Genesis 12:3 find themselves booed and laughed off the decreasing number of stages that they can climb on.
It seems more and more like campaigning on continuity and preserving the status quo is just not politically viable, and thus that even establishment politicians need to put on a 'populist' veneer, like Britain's Robert 'Jew-Wife' Jenrick, who, despite letting in many immigrants when he was the relevant minister, recently attended anti-immigration protests. Even the most establishment politicians, those with their yid spouses like Starmer and Jenrick, can see that everything is screwed - under their watch - and that they need to fake being outsiders who want change if they want to remain politically viable. They wouldn't see even the remotest need to do that if everything that I have written here is false.
It's a good write-up about all of this.
> They are exceedingly distrusting of the mass media that their parents absorbed like a sponge
This is where we have to come into play. To tell them that the "Mainstream Media" they despise so much - rightfully so - is just the jewish media. We have to help them understand that everything they hate about the world are the machinations of the jews.
Always provide something that leads back to jews - which always does btw. It's tragicomedic. They must hate the jews up to a point where they tolerate people like us manhandling them, putting them into camps and ethnic cleansing them.
Yeah, yeah, it's not all jews. Sure, but put 10 jews together, 7 agree to stab you in the back, but all of them agree to tell nobody. And it would be cynical to expect them to rat each other out. Which is why actually it's *ALL* jews.
> Distrusting even of their own country's exceptionalism.
Which is indeed questionable. What if the "exceptionalism" of the US is solely based on the Rothschilds central bankers granting it the US as a reward? They have the full control over the money from the source. They decide how much money is created out of nothing, which causes inflation. But is it REALLY about you as people having a good, "exceptional" life? Or is it about the entire USA having a good standing compared to others, which is barely related to your life and well-being?
There is so much shit going on in the US that affects the lives of people negatively. Goyslop food, insane levels of advertisements, ruled by big corporations, niggers and spics everywhere, the healthcare system being utterly absurd where a person gets utterly fucked for life if the insurer refuses to pay out.
What exactly is that American "exceptionalism"? Do you produce goods better than Germans? Is it a higher technological level than the rest of the West and Europe? Or does that "exceptionalism" only consist of being goy pet #1 to the jew who eagerly awaits his next pet on his head?
> No longer does it seem like winning the World Wars or the Cold War was some great victory.
Well, in essence: Congratulations, you saved the jews. Your reward is extinction under their rule.
> It seems more and more like campaigning on continuity and preserving the status quo is just not politically viable
Oh, don't get mistaken about that. The question is how long they can play the theatrics of democracy and get away with it. They will do it as long as possible, and pretend it's the standard boomer voting pattern all along. They probably already have taken measures to make sure that system continues. Maybe they provide some new controlled opposition with a lesbian leader like Germany's AfD. They are so radical, they want to ***reduce*** the mass importation of utter subhumans! Wowza so radical! Are you content goy, do you enjoy your victory?! Sure we'll have to step back to "reasonable" politics soon!
The only real solution is large scale violence. People need to accept TKD & TND. While these are memes, I mean it seriously. 0% jews, Arabs, niggers, Mexicans, gypsies, Indians left - 100% Whites (and some Orientals maybe, they are fine).
If you deport the jew, it's just a +1 on the heap of 1030+ expulsions. It didn't work 1030+ times before, so WHY should it work this time?
> They are exceedingly distrusting of the mass media that their parents absorbed like a sponge
This is where we have to come into play. To tell them that the "Mainstream Media" they despise so much - rightfully so - is just the jewish media. We have to help them understand that everything they hate about the world are the machinations of the jews.
Always provide something that leads back to jews - which always does btw. It's tragicomedic. They must hate the jews up to a point where they tolerate people like us manhandling them, putting them into camps and ethnic cleansing them.
Yeah, yeah, it's not all jews. Sure, but put 10 jews together, 7 agree to stab you in the back, but all of them agree to tell nobody. And it would be cynical to expect them to rat each other out. Which is why actually it's *ALL* jews.
> Distrusting even of their own country's exceptionalism.
Which is indeed questionable. What if the "exceptionalism" of the US is solely based on the Rothschilds central bankers granting it the US as a reward? They have the full control over the money from the source. They decide how much money is created out of nothing, which causes inflation. But is it REALLY about you as people having a good, "exceptional" life? Or is it about the entire USA having a good standing compared to others, which is barely related to your life and well-being?
There is so much shit going on in the US that affects the lives of people negatively. Goyslop food, insane levels of advertisements, ruled by big corporations, niggers and spics everywhere, the healthcare system being utterly absurd where a person gets utterly fucked for life if the insurer refuses to pay out.
What exactly is that American "exceptionalism"? Do you produce goods better than Germans? Is it a higher technological level than the rest of the West and Europe? Or does that "exceptionalism" only consist of being goy pet #1 to the jew who eagerly awaits his next pet on his head?
> No longer does it seem like winning the World Wars or the Cold War was some great victory.
Well, in essence: Congratulations, you saved the jews. Your reward is extinction under their rule.
> It seems more and more like campaigning on continuity and preserving the status quo is just not politically viable
Oh, don't get mistaken about that. The question is how long they can play the theatrics of democracy and get away with it. They will do it as long as possible, and pretend it's the standard boomer voting pattern all along. They probably already have taken measures to make sure that system continues. Maybe they provide some new controlled opposition with a lesbian leader like Germany's AfD. They are so radical, they want to ***reduce*** the mass importation of utter subhumans! Wowza so radical! Are you content goy, do you enjoy your victory?! Sure we'll have to step back to "reasonable" politics soon!
The only real solution is large scale violence. People need to accept TKD & TND. While these are memes, I mean it seriously. 0% jews, Arabs, niggers, Mexicans, gypsies, Indians left - 100% Whites (and some Orientals maybe, they are fine).
If you deport the jew, it's just a +1 on the heap of 1030+ expulsions. It didn't work 1030+ times before, so WHY should it work this time?
We're definitely in line on all these quoted points. Even on the last one, since I said that they cannot *campaign* on continuing the status quo. Of course most politicians are insiders that want to preserve the status quo. They're some of the biggest beneficiaries of it. What is changing is that they growingly need to appear to the public as though they're against all of the other insiders.
Hence Starmer talking about an 'island of strangers' when he is on video promoting even illegal immigration, and Jenrick saying that people feel like foreigners in their own cities, even though he brought in plenty of Afghan and other immigrants under the previous Tory government before Starmer became PM. These career politicians all have to pretend that they're something that they aren't, like wanting immigration reduction when they really just wish that people would stop problematizing it altogether so that they could focus on whatever they think actually matters, like doing whatever the yiddish lobbies want them to do.
Moving on to your additions:
The question of some or all yids. It is *all* yids. The goyim simply haven't studied the yids enough to ascertain fully the differences between the two, but, unlike the likes of E. Michael Jones, who still think of the yids as categorically human and thus simply in need of conversion, they are simply categorically different.
Conversion is futile, like trying to convert termite into an ant. At face value, they seem similar, but once you understand them, you find that termites are biologically closer to cockroaches, whom look very different, than ants. Yet most people will simply misjudge termites upon seeing them, as they already do, as 'white ants'. They even have ant-like colonies in which there are workers, soldiers, queens, etc. Appearances are totally deceiving with them as with the yid.
The hoverfly is an insect that *prima facie* appears to be a kind of bee or wasp, even imitating pollinating behaviours when it is actually incapable of pollinating. The reality is that this is a fly species. It is actually harmless, possessing neither bite nor stinger.
Similar with cuckoo bird eggs, which appear to be eggs of other species. This confuses birds, who wrongly assume the resultant hatchling to be one of their own.
Biology provides plenty of examples of deceptive species whose members appear to be of those of another class.
In summary, while yids are indeed capable of interbreeding with humans, they are *not* human. The appearance is simply deceptive, as with the termite and hoverfly.
Once equipped with the correct knowledge, however, the deception no longer works. I see hoverflies frequently and can tell them apart from bees and wasps easily. Most people cannot. Similar thing with us and yids.
American exceptionalism is a nebulous concept. Academics find that it usually revolves around belief in some kind of national mission. Mitt Romney said: 'America must lead the world. ... I believe we are an exceptional country, with a unique destiny and role in the world.'
For most peoples, a country doesn't have any purpose beyond being a home for its people. It doesn't have a mission to lead the world or perform any kind of other role beyond survival. Thus Romney's words are an example of this kind of aberrant thinking. America has some kind of destiny, mission, purpose, role, etc. that other countries and peoples simply do not have. Polls show that younger Americans overwhelmingly reject this kind of idea. They aren't big on being the 'global policeman' or anything like this. Maybe this is why America has an affinity with yids, since yids also speak of their mission to 'heal the world'/Tikkun Olam.
I agree in particular about TKD and TND. The others are less problematic, although Indians not much less so. Hajjis and spix a little bit less again, and most Asians a little bit less yet again. The ancient Chinese are far more impressive than the niggers and kikes of any time period. But many of these countries have plummeting total fertility rates and will become less of a problem over time as their populations begin to shrink. Niggers notably excepted: a big argument for TND, since they won't willingly extinguish themselves, unlike the Emiratis and many other idiotic peoples.
And, yes, the fact that expulsions fail is one of many arguments for TKD. It's not that we aren't expelling them right. It's that expulsion itself doesn't work. Ignorant future generations, unaware of why we needed to be so 'draconian' and 'harsh' to these anthropoid vermin, underestimate the threat and thus begin to feel apologetic. The interaction between yid and goy is essentially cyclical: for Whites, it is to go from being welcoming to anger to guilt and back to being welcoming. TKD is the only way to stop that cycle continuing indefinitely... unless some White idiot finds a way to bring them back into being as humans are already trying to do with various extinct species. TKD/TND!
Hence Starmer talking about an 'island of strangers' when he is on video promoting even illegal immigration, and Jenrick saying that people feel like foreigners in their own cities, even though he brought in plenty of Afghan and other immigrants under the previous Tory government before Starmer became PM. These career politicians all have to pretend that they're something that they aren't, like wanting immigration reduction when they really just wish that people would stop problematizing it altogether so that they could focus on whatever they think actually matters, like doing whatever the yiddish lobbies want them to do.
Moving on to your additions:
The question of some or all yids. It is *all* yids. The goyim simply haven't studied the yids enough to ascertain fully the differences between the two, but, unlike the likes of E. Michael Jones, who still think of the yids as categorically human and thus simply in need of conversion, they are simply categorically different.
Conversion is futile, like trying to convert termite into an ant. At face value, they seem similar, but once you understand them, you find that termites are biologically closer to cockroaches, whom look very different, than ants. Yet most people will simply misjudge termites upon seeing them, as they already do, as 'white ants'. They even have ant-like colonies in which there are workers, soldiers, queens, etc. Appearances are totally deceiving with them as with the yid.
The hoverfly is an insect that *prima facie* appears to be a kind of bee or wasp, even imitating pollinating behaviours when it is actually incapable of pollinating. The reality is that this is a fly species. It is actually harmless, possessing neither bite nor stinger.
Similar with cuckoo bird eggs, which appear to be eggs of other species. This confuses birds, who wrongly assume the resultant hatchling to be one of their own.
Biology provides plenty of examples of deceptive species whose members appear to be of those of another class.
In summary, while yids are indeed capable of interbreeding with humans, they are *not* human. The appearance is simply deceptive, as with the termite and hoverfly.
Once equipped with the correct knowledge, however, the deception no longer works. I see hoverflies frequently and can tell them apart from bees and wasps easily. Most people cannot. Similar thing with us and yids.
American exceptionalism is a nebulous concept. Academics find that it usually revolves around belief in some kind of national mission. Mitt Romney said: 'America must lead the world. ... I believe we are an exceptional country, with a unique destiny and role in the world.'
For most peoples, a country doesn't have any purpose beyond being a home for its people. It doesn't have a mission to lead the world or perform any kind of other role beyond survival. Thus Romney's words are an example of this kind of aberrant thinking. America has some kind of destiny, mission, purpose, role, etc. that other countries and peoples simply do not have. Polls show that younger Americans overwhelmingly reject this kind of idea. They aren't big on being the 'global policeman' or anything like this. Maybe this is why America has an affinity with yids, since yids also speak of their mission to 'heal the world'/Tikkun Olam.
I agree in particular about TKD and TND. The others are less problematic, although Indians not much less so. Hajjis and spix a little bit less again, and most Asians a little bit less yet again. The ancient Chinese are far more impressive than the niggers and kikes of any time period. But many of these countries have plummeting total fertility rates and will become less of a problem over time as their populations begin to shrink. Niggers notably excepted: a big argument for TND, since they won't willingly extinguish themselves, unlike the Emiratis and many other idiotic peoples.
And, yes, the fact that expulsions fail is one of many arguments for TKD. It's not that we aren't expelling them right. It's that expulsion itself doesn't work. Ignorant future generations, unaware of why we needed to be so 'draconian' and 'harsh' to these anthropoid vermin, underestimate the threat and thus begin to feel apologetic. The interaction between yid and goy is essentially cyclical: for Whites, it is to go from being welcoming to anger to guilt and back to being welcoming. TKD is the only way to stop that cycle continuing indefinitely... unless some White idiot finds a way to bring them back into being as humans are already trying to do with various extinct species. TKD/TND!
> unlike the likes of E. Michael Jones, who still think of the yids as categorically human and thus simply in need of conversion, they are simply categorically different.
This includes Adolf Hitler and Nazis. They too thought they could reform jews in the camps. That was *one* reason they were put into camps, the other being that they were suspicious to work for the enemy, just as the Japanese were put into internment camps in WWII in the US. And then there was the plethora of communists, self-declared enemies of Germany, the faggot-tranny-degenerates, the usurers - they outright yearned to get stowed away.
*That* was the nice way. But they declared it the Holocaust™ and made a lot of atrocity propaganda over it.
So next time no reform attempt. Just bullets and mass graves.
> Biology provides plenty of examples of deceptive species whose members appear to be of those of another class.
This is also the reason why subhumans go screaming and crying, begging for mercy, when they committed a crime and you stop them. They try to evoke empathy, including from others, especially women, because they know it's our people's weak spot, and gives them a chance to get away. And they are weak, if they could kill you, they would.
If someone wonders why I am not empathetic, it's because there were too many instances in which various heinous subhumans tried to abuse it. This includes multiple instances of personal experience as well. If some subhuman like a gypsy asks me for anything, I refuse. Last time this happened 3 days ago - he just wanted to convince me to do some shady, convoluted bullshit. Some scam. And after I refused, he got insulting. I was prepared to kill him if he'd become violent - I had everything necessary there. I despise all brownoids, and as I accrue information and make experiences, it's only getting worse.
> They aren't big on being the 'global policeman' or anything like this.
Well, "shabbos goy pet on the leash by jews" is a more accurate description than "global policemen." As if the US is a force of good. They participated in WWI (on the side of evil), they defeated Hitler, who was about to liberate Europe from the jewish and communist threat, they fought wars on behalf of israel. The US literally allied themselves with the communists, who later conquered and fucked up half of Europe. The communists who previously murdered tens of millions of Christian Whites via the most cruel method possible - to have them slave labor with eventual exhaustion for decades.
The people themselves aren't really evil, they believe they do good. But they are used to pursue the malevolent interests of jews. Their nationalism is funneled into ways that harms us and even themselves. It's not like there is no price for the Americans to pay - they are the first to get mongrelized and genocided.
And we are ALL victim of the jewish illusions. The monetary system itself - it's such a beast of an illusion. An illusion so powerful that we cannot even fight it. We know it's bullshit, but we *have* to play along.
> thus begin to feel apologetic.
And I am not sure I could blame them for that. We ultimately have to deal with the issues at hand, if some generations never had anything to do with jews, they can believe their forefathers were just exaggerating. Maybe their ancient knowledge wasn't as advanced as theirs. Maybe they based their views on haphazard methods like anecdotal evidence, or have some arbitrary ruler who can enact even irrational decrees. Or: The jews manage to infiltrate in others ways, sneaking their way in.
We are at a peak of knowing the jew, we have to use that knowledge. Or, if we can't, make sure to pass it to future generations.
And I seek to break the cycle, just as you. It *has* to happen, because it indeed became a matter of survival for our people.
This includes Adolf Hitler and Nazis. They too thought they could reform jews in the camps. That was *one* reason they were put into camps, the other being that they were suspicious to work for the enemy, just as the Japanese were put into internment camps in WWII in the US. And then there was the plethora of communists, self-declared enemies of Germany, the faggot-tranny-degenerates, the usurers - they outright yearned to get stowed away.
*That* was the nice way. But they declared it the Holocaust™ and made a lot of atrocity propaganda over it.
So next time no reform attempt. Just bullets and mass graves.
> Biology provides plenty of examples of deceptive species whose members appear to be of those of another class.
This is also the reason why subhumans go screaming and crying, begging for mercy, when they committed a crime and you stop them. They try to evoke empathy, including from others, especially women, because they know it's our people's weak spot, and gives them a chance to get away. And they are weak, if they could kill you, they would.
If someone wonders why I am not empathetic, it's because there were too many instances in which various heinous subhumans tried to abuse it. This includes multiple instances of personal experience as well. If some subhuman like a gypsy asks me for anything, I refuse. Last time this happened 3 days ago - he just wanted to convince me to do some shady, convoluted bullshit. Some scam. And after I refused, he got insulting. I was prepared to kill him if he'd become violent - I had everything necessary there. I despise all brownoids, and as I accrue information and make experiences, it's only getting worse.
> They aren't big on being the 'global policeman' or anything like this.
Well, "shabbos goy pet on the leash by jews" is a more accurate description than "global policemen." As if the US is a force of good. They participated in WWI (on the side of evil), they defeated Hitler, who was about to liberate Europe from the jewish and communist threat, they fought wars on behalf of israel. The US literally allied themselves with the communists, who later conquered and fucked up half of Europe. The communists who previously murdered tens of millions of Christian Whites via the most cruel method possible - to have them slave labor with eventual exhaustion for decades.
The people themselves aren't really evil, they believe they do good. But they are used to pursue the malevolent interests of jews. Their nationalism is funneled into ways that harms us and even themselves. It's not like there is no price for the Americans to pay - they are the first to get mongrelized and genocided.
And we are ALL victim of the jewish illusions. The monetary system itself - it's such a beast of an illusion. An illusion so powerful that we cannot even fight it. We know it's bullshit, but we *have* to play along.
> thus begin to feel apologetic.
And I am not sure I could blame them for that. We ultimately have to deal with the issues at hand, if some generations never had anything to do with jews, they can believe their forefathers were just exaggerating. Maybe their ancient knowledge wasn't as advanced as theirs. Maybe they based their views on haphazard methods like anecdotal evidence, or have some arbitrary ruler who can enact even irrational decrees. Or: The jews manage to infiltrate in others ways, sneaking their way in.
We are at a peak of knowing the jew, we have to use that knowledge. Or, if we can't, make sure to pass it to future generations.
And I seek to break the cycle, just as you. It *has* to happen, because it indeed became a matter of survival for our people.
Toast message