New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
35
posted 12 days ago by ProductConnoisseur on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +35Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
13
devotech2 on scored.co
12 days ago 13 points (+0 / -0 / +13Score on mirror ) 1 child
>conservative pundit that discusses Muslim terrorists ad infinitum and nothing else

>look inside

>zionist shabbos goy shill

Every fucking time without fail. If they talk about Islam, but never talk about jews, race, etc, they are a shill. The same goes for people who only talk about feminism. They are also shills.

Actually, almost anyone who focuses exclusively on a symptom of the problem is a paid shill or completely ignorant.

Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
disusekid on scored.co
12 days ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror ) 1 child
I saw the number "2,000" while all news sources said ~50 and I immediately assumed Samantha Smith was a troll "taking the piss", so to speak, by inflating the numbers.

She is being serious?

That just makes the absurd number inflation even funnier.

devotech2 on scored.co
12 days ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror ) 1 child
I thought it was taking the piss too, but I checked her Twitter and everything she's posted is completely serious, and it's *all* about Islam. So i presume this is serious too. This is probably the biggest red flag with any political pundit: exclusivity. Discussing one topic and one topic only. Whether it's Muslims, or "the woke mob", or democrats, or immigrants, or women. I don't even trust commentators that only discuss race. It's all carefully manufactured and intentionally deceitful. Focusing on one truth and convincing everyone that nothing else is a problem at all is worse than just telling them nothing, because it gives them tunnel vision towards said thing and leads them to deny that anything else could be an issue.

*Even* if we were to only discuss the *jews*, it's *still* counterproductive. Because it removes our collective responsibility and guilt for letting them get to this point in the first place, which would lead to us making the same mistakes in time. Nothing is gained by focusing on one topic, a wide variety of knowledge on all manner of things should be cultivated.

But it's the jew game. Inflate numbers. Look at all the other numbers they inflated, from economies to body counts. And they really can't help themselves. Israeli propagandists will have you believe that hamas is absolutely dogwalking the fuck out of the IDF and massacring soldiers and civilians alike left and right, and in the same breath will say that the IDF is cleaning house with hamas and that they've single handedly killed 6 million insurgents with 109 kike forces dead since 2023

Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
disusekid on scored.co
12 days ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Good observation.

>But it's the jew game. Inflate numbers. Look at all the other numbers they inflated, from economies to body counts. And they really can't help themselves. Israeli propagandists will have you believe that hamas is absolutely dogwalking the fuck out of the IDF and massacring soldiers and civilians alike left and right, and in the same breath will say that the IDF is cleaning house with hamas and that they've single handedly killed 6 million insurgents with 109 kike forces dead since 2023

The "holy" land reminds me of the Old West.

In the wild west, people would make up gunfight stories that probably never happened and would greatly embellish gunfights that actually did happen in order to make it seem more "cinematic".

Newspapers would pretend to know facts that they could not possibly have known and they would also try to depict one side in a fight as "good" and the other as "bad" when in reality it was probably drunken criminals shooting at each other over a gambling game.

"There were 8 cowboys and I emptied my 6-shooter and got 'em all!"

Toast message