New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
posted 22 days ago by Vlad_The_Impaler on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
disoriented on scored.co
22 days ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
In a way. Christianity in the first and second centuries was finding its way and was deeply divided between sects that wanted to include jewish practices and those that wanted nothing at all to do with jewish superstition. The first Christian Bible was compiled by Marcion and presented to the church in Rome in 144. It contained scripture *as it originally was before it was subjected to revisions, interpolations, and lengthy additions by converted jews a century later.*

It is a fact that converted jews revised and rewrote sections of the Greek scriptures to include a jewish provenance for Christianity that did not exist in the first and second centuries.

Marcion's Bible was rejected and denounced by the early church in 144, creating a schism that lasted until the first Nicene Council, establishing Christian orthodoxy that included the jewish-influenced scripture.
Vlad_The_Impaler on scored.co
22 days ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
Corey Mahler addressed the revisionism in the Bible in his Final Season of Stone Choir https://stone-choir.com/
disoriented on scored.co
21 days ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
What does he say? I'm not going to waste hours of my life listening to a stupid podcast unless I have a good reason. I'd like to learn something, not listen to yet another blathering idiot's uninformed or biased opinion.
Vlad_The_Impaler on scored.co
21 days ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
To make episodes 99 through 106 as concise as possible it boils down to:

>Christ, the Apostles, and the early Church all unanimously held that the Septuagint is, indeed, the very Word of God.

The episodes go into details between the Septuagint (LXX) and the rabbinic text (MT)

The last two episodes covering New Testament in summary state:

>we cover the places where the New Testament cites the Old Testament and there is a difference between the Septuagint (LXX) and the rabbinic text. In this first (of two) episodes, we cover citations from Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, and Acts; in the next episode, we will cover Romans through Revelation. By the sheer weight of the evidence, it will become undeniable that the New Testament authors were reading and citing the Septuagint — not some supposed ‘Hebrew’ edition (that, in fact, no longer existed at the time of the composition of the New Testament).
Toast message