Nick the 'spic
(cdn.videy.co)
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Toast message
What in the world is this dogshit? Cain's race is unknown; his entire line was wiped out in the flood of Noah. Esau was a semite, which means an Arab. Whites are Japhetic, and have less than nothing to do with the middle eastern squabbles of jewry. Stop listening to the rabbis who call us Amalek, Edom, etc. They're doing that to create religious license to destroy us. They'd call the Chinese that if they needed to. Proof is an obstacle to the rabbis and they don't need it. 90% of judaism is "make it up as you go along".
The nephilim are mentioned after the flood, lol. They're not Adamic. The flood could not have been global, the word meant land back in those days. God wiped out the mixed Adamic people and the ones that accepted them, everyone but Noah and his family. Not Cain, since he was somewhere else.
The stuff you listen to is crazy. It sounds like you're getting a mix of jew, gnostic, and Christian theology.
> Cain's father was the serpent that seduced Eve
Wrong. Genesis 4:1 states:
>And Adam knew Eve his wife: who conceived and brought forth Cain, saying: I have gotten a man through God.
The idea that Eve had sex with a serpent or Adam banged animals is a rabbinic idea. You can tell because not only is it insane and perverted, it's totally erroneous. Adam and Eve only had sex with each other, no one or thing else. Anyone telling you they screwed a serpent is barfing up jewdeo-gnostic garbage.
>Esau was 100% white or Adamic if you will
Refer to the table of nations, starting in Genesis 10, so you can have a proper understanding of who descended from who. The story of Isaac, Esau, and Jacob can be found in Genesis 25. Use LXX (Septuagint) or Douay-Rheims. Do NOT use the awful Masoretic text, which can unfortunately be found in almost all other English language translations.
Whatever race Esau was (SEMITIC, not JAPHETIC), Isaac was. Isaac was the father of the 12 tribes constituting the house of Israel. The Bible's record is quite clear that Isaac (Esau/Edom's father) was a descendant of Shem.
Japheth fathered a completely different branch of humanity. HE AND HIS CHILDREN HAVE NO PART IN THIS STORY. They settled in what is now Europe and are the fathers of the White races. The pre-Christian, pagan Romans retained a memory of this and deified our great patriarch, Japheth, calling him IAPETUS. They have no such memory of Shem or Cham/Ham, because those men fathered different branches of humanity and have nothing to do with Whites.
>Esau race-mixed with the Canaanites.
This is like saying "The Bretons (a French tribe) race-mixed with the Gauls (another French tribe)". Both peoples are so closely related it can hardly be compared to race-mixing today, where people freely mix all colors with no regard for anything.
>Edomites are his descendants, and they're Canaanites and Kenites.
Again, these people have nothing to do with Europeans, who were established by Japheth.
>The nephilim are mentioned after the flood, lol.
Where? Every giant is a nephil? That doesn't make sense. They aren't mentioned by name at all in the DR translation. Reverend Haydock, the great Biblical commentator, says they came from Enoch. Noah and his family are the only humans to escape the flood. All humans today descend from them.
>They're not Adamic.
Everyone today most certainly is.
>The flood could not have been global,
Genesis 6:17
>Behold I will bring the waters of a great flood upon the earth, to destroy all flesh, wherein is the breath of life, under heaven. All things that are in the earth shall be consumed.
Genesis 7:21
>And all flesh was destroyed that moved upon the earth, both of fowl, and of cattle, and of beasts, and of all creeping things that creep upon the earth: and all men.
Sounds global to me. If the flood was local, God is a liar, because He promised he would never destroy all flesh with a flood again. But there have been many local floods since that time, and people of every single race have died in large numbers as a result of these floods. So God's promise only makes sense if the flood was a WORLDWIDE, GLOBAL CATASTROPHE THAT WIPED OUT ALL LIFE.
>Not Cain, since he was somewhere else.
You're right they were somewhere else. Cain's line died out in the flood and he himself was long dead.
Genesis 4:1 is corrupt in the Hebrew. You understand Scripture wasn't originally written in English right? What we have is an interpolation - they filled in the blanks, plus there is no second witness. I can link a paper if you want.
I'm not sure how animals were brought into this. Ancient stories use the eating of fruit as an allegory for sex. Gilgamesh is one example. The dragon that tries to kill Christ as a child, which is also said to be the serpent, is only Herrod, and we see in Josephus that he's an Edomite. Christ came to manage things know that were hidden from the foundation of the world(Genesis). This is one of them.
I'm not sure why you said that in response to Esau's race. I only said it because, while Esau is white, his descendants are mixed with the Canaanites and Kennites, and are not white/ Adamic.
The kjv translators said to deal with any discrepancies in their original languages, so here is that word "world" (H776, Erets) and it's translated as "lands" way more than world. It can't mean the entire planet. I can share something that does into more detail if you wish. Also, "wherein is the breath of life" does not cover the fallen angels.
LOL so when Christ blames the jews for Abel's death, He's just lying eh? No, those are Edomites He's talking to, who have their ancestry with the fallen angels.
I would recommend this or the "Bible Basics" series so you can understand the methodology being used. It's quite reasonable: https://christogenea.org/podcasts/bible-discussion/biblical-exegesis-revisited