You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
-1
Zyxl on scored.co
1 month ago-1 points(+0/-0/-1Score on mirror)2 children
Hello? Have you looked around lately? The internet and smartphone have killed human interaction and social cohesion, fuelling depression and other mental illnesses like transgenderism. AI is all about replacing humans and outsourcing your thinking to machines, meaning you get dumber, and this has already been proven by studies. As if it wasn't blatantly obvious to begin with.
Think. Is that a necessary consequence of these things simply existing at all, or is it the result of the people that are using them already having undergone over a century of an enormous culture shift in the first place? People were already propagandized *to be like this*, having a phone or the internet or whatever just facilitates it, but everything you mentioned was being normalized already long before 2007 for the smart phone, or the late 90s for (easily accessible) internet. If the smartphone were invented in the 1700s, would people be using them for the same things? Probably not. They would likely use the phone for looking up times that the nearest symphony starts playing, or for recipes, or to read the Bible, or maybe to read Rousseau, or to connect with friends. They wouldn't use it to watch porn and such a thing would probably be illegal in any case
Phone = bad simply because people had already become mentally weak before the phone even came into existence.
And is AI replacing humans a necessary feature of its existence or is it just the fact that this is what the creators of it wanted to do in the first place? I'm on the fence with ai in general, but it's true that it can, indeed, be useful for much more than whatever the fuck the jewish silicone Valley wants to do with it. Imagine a wehrmacht with palantir.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
Yes, these are the necessary consequences of making these technologies cheaply available to the masses, given human nature. That's why the effects have been the same in every society they were introduced to and across all types of people in the society. The internet isn't just used for porn in western (largely secular) countries, it's used for porn in Catholic countries, in communist countries, in Muslim countries and so on. And yes, it would have been the same in the 1700's, just as they had brothels back then. And of course people in the 1700's would also have less reason to see each other in person if they could converse with many more people of similar opinions more conveniently over the internet, so their social cohesion would break down in the same way ours has.
You can't give cocaine to a child who doesn't know anything about drugs and expecting him not to get addicted. Societies might learn that smartphones and the internet are bad with experience, but until then they're ignorant and tend to shrug off the warnings as speculative, highly exaggerated or slippery slope arguments. All societies are still in the learning process since none of them has rejected these technologies (well, except for Mennonites and probably some primitive tribes who thought technology was evil voodoo).
While it's possible that these technologies would be a net positive for humanity if used very sparingly, that's simply not a realistic scenario because the temptation is too great to use them for pleasure.
And yes, AI is about replacing humans because it can be defined as machines that do things which previously required intelligent human thought. The whole point is to automate out human thought processes, which if applied to everything leaves humans with no need to think about anything, just consoom and experience emotions for pure pleasure and no purpose.
>the same in every society they were introduced to
Not really. Different countries use the internet in different ways. Chinese people don't use it the same way westerners do, or the same way pajeets do, or the same way African niggers do. Also, this global culture shift was well and truly *global*. Every single person alive with few exceptions is weaker than their ancestors were.
>The internet isn't just used for porn in western countries
And? Who pushes porn. Who creates the porn websites? Who is the reason why the internet is synonymous with porn? Who made porn popular before the internet was invented? Who made porn no longer the domain of creepy individuals reading libel magazines and turned it into something "cool" and "normal". It's a particular group of individuals and I'm sure you're aware of them. Porn is naturally disgusting to most except people who are perverted by their brain missing screws. But there has been an odd group of folks that have been working on sexualizing society at large, not just western society anymore but global society, for a really long time, and making hard-core pornography normal. This has had worldwide consequences. Again, since before the internet existed. To a certain extent, or maybe a large extent, you can thank America for global sexualization of culture because American soft power is absolutely unparalleled. And its ability to reach into the deepest darkest crevices of every single human society is almost unbelievable.
>And yes, it would have been the same in the 1700's, just as they had brothels back then
There is a pretty big difference. Having actual sex with women is appealing to everyone that isn't disabled or a faggot. Watching other people fuck is not naturally appealing. Porn already existed in society during the 1700s in the form of magazines sold by shady people to weird perverts like de sade. It was considered disgusting by the overwhelming majority because, again, even if you weren't religious at the time and you were a dandy that fancied a night at the whorehouse every week, watching people fuck is weird unless you've been primed to enjoy it.
>And of course people in the 1700's would also have less reason to see each other in person if they could converse with many more people of similar opinions more conveniently over the internet, so their social cohesion would break down in the same way ours has.
You aren't wrong, but again, it's a double edged sword and you're leaving out the other half. That is that the internet is sometimes one of the only ways to connect with like minded people. How many people back then had an idea and it just never came to fruition because they never met anyone like minded? I can also point to how the internet can *facilitate* meetings as well.
>And yes, AI is about replacing humans because it can be defined as machines that do things which previously required intelligent human thought. The whole point is to automate out human thought processes, which if applied to everything leaves humans with no need to think about anything, just consoom and experience emotions for pure pleasure and no purpose.
Again, as I said, I'm on the fence about AI. I don't really like it but I see that it can be used for a better purpose. But if it were not a good utilitarian tool, why are ZOG armies around the world flocking to get it? I just don't think it should be available to the general public. Keep it in the scientific and military sphere. Again, imagine a wehrmacht with palantir.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
Women had political equality for a long time, and freedom for much much longer and men didn't have problems getting married until the last couple of decades. The reason is the internet. Radical feminism had a role too, but that's different from female freedom, it's the idea that women should be more like men.
And notice that technology enables feminism and radical feminism because it downplays the gendered difference in physical strength (women can do men's work with machines and can fight off men with weapons) and also enables women to masculinize themselves with pills that stop their periods and change their sexual urges. "Sex change" surgeries and drugs also contribute in extreme cases.
1 month ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
The trend of women being sluttier and less in need of a man's income would have happened without the internet. technology plays a role in enabling but the core of this issue is women's sexual freedom.
I agree with that, although I would just say whorishness instead of "sexual freedom". I think the problem of finding a good wife is caused both by whorishness and technology, and the latter aids the former.
Phone = bad simply because people had already become mentally weak before the phone even came into existence.
And is AI replacing humans a necessary feature of its existence or is it just the fact that this is what the creators of it wanted to do in the first place? I'm on the fence with ai in general, but it's true that it can, indeed, be useful for much more than whatever the fuck the jewish silicone Valley wants to do with it. Imagine a wehrmacht with palantir.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
You can't give cocaine to a child who doesn't know anything about drugs and expecting him not to get addicted. Societies might learn that smartphones and the internet are bad with experience, but until then they're ignorant and tend to shrug off the warnings as speculative, highly exaggerated or slippery slope arguments. All societies are still in the learning process since none of them has rejected these technologies (well, except for Mennonites and probably some primitive tribes who thought technology was evil voodoo).
While it's possible that these technologies would be a net positive for humanity if used very sparingly, that's simply not a realistic scenario because the temptation is too great to use them for pleasure.
And yes, AI is about replacing humans because it can be defined as machines that do things which previously required intelligent human thought. The whole point is to automate out human thought processes, which if applied to everything leaves humans with no need to think about anything, just consoom and experience emotions for pure pleasure and no purpose.
Not really. Different countries use the internet in different ways. Chinese people don't use it the same way westerners do, or the same way pajeets do, or the same way African niggers do. Also, this global culture shift was well and truly *global*. Every single person alive with few exceptions is weaker than their ancestors were.
>The internet isn't just used for porn in western countries
And? Who pushes porn. Who creates the porn websites? Who is the reason why the internet is synonymous with porn? Who made porn popular before the internet was invented? Who made porn no longer the domain of creepy individuals reading libel magazines and turned it into something "cool" and "normal". It's a particular group of individuals and I'm sure you're aware of them. Porn is naturally disgusting to most except people who are perverted by their brain missing screws. But there has been an odd group of folks that have been working on sexualizing society at large, not just western society anymore but global society, for a really long time, and making hard-core pornography normal. This has had worldwide consequences. Again, since before the internet existed. To a certain extent, or maybe a large extent, you can thank America for global sexualization of culture because American soft power is absolutely unparalleled. And its ability to reach into the deepest darkest crevices of every single human society is almost unbelievable.
>And yes, it would have been the same in the 1700's, just as they had brothels back then
There is a pretty big difference. Having actual sex with women is appealing to everyone that isn't disabled or a faggot. Watching other people fuck is not naturally appealing. Porn already existed in society during the 1700s in the form of magazines sold by shady people to weird perverts like de sade. It was considered disgusting by the overwhelming majority because, again, even if you weren't religious at the time and you were a dandy that fancied a night at the whorehouse every week, watching people fuck is weird unless you've been primed to enjoy it.
>And of course people in the 1700's would also have less reason to see each other in person if they could converse with many more people of similar opinions more conveniently over the internet, so their social cohesion would break down in the same way ours has.
You aren't wrong, but again, it's a double edged sword and you're leaving out the other half. That is that the internet is sometimes one of the only ways to connect with like minded people. How many people back then had an idea and it just never came to fruition because they never met anyone like minded? I can also point to how the internet can *facilitate* meetings as well.
>And yes, AI is about replacing humans because it can be defined as machines that do things which previously required intelligent human thought. The whole point is to automate out human thought processes, which if applied to everything leaves humans with no need to think about anything, just consoom and experience emotions for pure pleasure and no purpose.
Again, as I said, I'm on the fence about AI. I don't really like it but I see that it can be used for a better purpose. But if it were not a good utilitarian tool, why are ZOG armies around the world flocking to get it? I just don't think it should be available to the general public. Keep it in the scientific and military sphere. Again, imagine a wehrmacht with palantir.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
And notice that technology enables feminism and radical feminism because it downplays the gendered difference in physical strength (women can do men's work with machines and can fight off men with weapons) and also enables women to masculinize themselves with pills that stop their periods and change their sexual urges. "Sex change" surgeries and drugs also contribute in extreme cases.