You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
-1
devotech2 on scored.co
1 month ago-1 points(+0/-0/-1Score on mirror)1 child
Technology is good. Technological progress is very white. Hitler was a bit of a futurist himself. That being said, the problem is that technological progress in the west is in the hands of multi-billionaire oligarch jews. The reason that "technology" as a broad brush stroke always seems to be getting more confining, controlling, and anti consumer is exactly because of this.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
1 month ago-1 points(+0/-0/-1Score on mirror)1 child
The internet, social media, the smartphone and advanced AI would have been made without Jews. You can tell because Americans, Europeans, Africans and Asians all couldn't wait to start using them. And they still do even when the fairly obvious negative consequences are already present. Blaming Jews for everything is retarded.
1 month ago-1 points(+0/-0/-1Score on mirror)2 children
Hello? Have you looked around lately? The internet and smartphone have killed human interaction and social cohesion, fuelling depression and other mental illnesses like transgenderism. AI is all about replacing humans and outsourcing your thinking to machines, meaning you get dumber, and this has already been proven by studies. As if it wasn't blatantly obvious to begin with.
Think. Is that a necessary consequence of these things simply existing at all, or is it the result of the people that are using them already having undergone over a century of an enormous culture shift in the first place? People were already propagandized *to be like this*, having a phone or the internet or whatever just facilitates it, but everything you mentioned was being normalized already long before 2007 for the smart phone, or the late 90s for (easily accessible) internet. If the smartphone were invented in the 1700s, would people be using them for the same things? Probably not. They would likely use the phone for looking up times that the nearest symphony starts playing, or for recipes, or to read the Bible, or maybe to read Rousseau, or to connect with friends. They wouldn't use it to watch porn and such a thing would probably be illegal in any case
Phone = bad simply because people had already become mentally weak before the phone even came into existence.
And is AI replacing humans a necessary feature of its existence or is it just the fact that this is what the creators of it wanted to do in the first place? I'm on the fence with ai in general, but it's true that it can, indeed, be useful for much more than whatever the fuck the jewish silicone Valley wants to do with it. Imagine a wehrmacht with palantir.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
Yes, these are the necessary consequences of making these technologies cheaply available to the masses, given human nature. That's why the effects have been the same in every society they were introduced to and across all types of people in the society. The internet isn't just used for porn in western (largely secular) countries, it's used for porn in Catholic countries, in communist countries, in Muslim countries and so on. And yes, it would have been the same in the 1700's, just as they had brothels back then. And of course people in the 1700's would also have less reason to see each other in person if they could converse with many more people of similar opinions more conveniently over the internet, so their social cohesion would break down in the same way ours has.
You can't give cocaine to a child who doesn't know anything about drugs and expecting him not to get addicted. Societies might learn that smartphones and the internet are bad with experience, but until then they're ignorant and tend to shrug off the warnings as speculative, highly exaggerated or slippery slope arguments. All societies are still in the learning process since none of them has rejected these technologies (well, except for Mennonites and probably some primitive tribes who thought technology was evil voodoo).
While it's possible that these technologies would be a net positive for humanity if used very sparingly, that's simply not a realistic scenario because the temptation is too great to use them for pleasure.
And yes, AI is about replacing humans because it can be defined as machines that do things which previously required intelligent human thought. The whole point is to automate out human thought processes, which if applied to everything leaves humans with no need to think about anything, just consoom and experience emotions for pure pleasure and no purpose.
Women had political equality for a long time, and freedom for much much longer and men didn't have problems getting married until the last couple of decades. The reason is the internet. Radical feminism had a role too, but that's different from female freedom, it's the idea that women should be more like men.
And notice that technology enables feminism and radical feminism because it downplays the gendered difference in physical strength (women can do men's work with machines and can fight off men with weapons) and also enables women to masculinize themselves with pills that stop their periods and change their sexual urges. "Sex change" surgeries and drugs also contribute in extreme cases.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
Phone = bad simply because people had already become mentally weak before the phone even came into existence.
And is AI replacing humans a necessary feature of its existence or is it just the fact that this is what the creators of it wanted to do in the first place? I'm on the fence with ai in general, but it's true that it can, indeed, be useful for much more than whatever the fuck the jewish silicone Valley wants to do with it. Imagine a wehrmacht with palantir.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
You can't give cocaine to a child who doesn't know anything about drugs and expecting him not to get addicted. Societies might learn that smartphones and the internet are bad with experience, but until then they're ignorant and tend to shrug off the warnings as speculative, highly exaggerated or slippery slope arguments. All societies are still in the learning process since none of them has rejected these technologies (well, except for Mennonites and probably some primitive tribes who thought technology was evil voodoo).
While it's possible that these technologies would be a net positive for humanity if used very sparingly, that's simply not a realistic scenario because the temptation is too great to use them for pleasure.
And yes, AI is about replacing humans because it can be defined as machines that do things which previously required intelligent human thought. The whole point is to automate out human thought processes, which if applied to everything leaves humans with no need to think about anything, just consoom and experience emotions for pure pleasure and no purpose.
And notice that technology enables feminism and radical feminism because it downplays the gendered difference in physical strength (women can do men's work with machines and can fight off men with weapons) and also enables women to masculinize themselves with pills that stop their periods and change their sexual urges. "Sex change" surgeries and drugs also contribute in extreme cases.