Consume Product

>700 jews killed because of a single loan at 2 cents interest

Those were the days.

Idk how the goys pull it off, i think you need to have a verified account or a big follower account to be shoah proof

but even then, if you dare insult kikes or jeets they can still mass report your profile and poof, there goes thousands if not hundrends of thousands of subs

but even still, fighting against the censorship machine is better than staying in a telegram echo chamber where you post redpills to those who are already redpilled

just make sure to make plenty of backups

More expansive list

https://web.archive.org/web/20220210145726/https://judaism.is/ritual-murder.html

Picking up where you left off....

1279 A.D., The most respectable Jews of London crucified a Christian child on April 2nd. (Florent de Worcester, Chron. 222)

1279 A.D., The crucifixion of a Christian child at Northampton after unheard-of tortures. (Henri Desportes Le mystere du sang, 67)

1282 A.D., In Munich the Jews purchased a small boy and stabbed him all over his body. (Rader., Bavar. sancta I. Bd. p. 315)

1283 A.D., A child was sold by his nurse to the Jews of Mainz , who killed it. (Baroerus ad annum No. 61. Annalen von Colmar)

1286 A.D., In Munich the Jews martyred two boys. The wooden synagogue was encircled with fire and 180 Jews burnt to death. (Murer, Helvetia sancta.)

1286 A.D., In April, at Oberwesel on the Rhine, 14-year-old St. Werner was slowly tortured to death by the Jews over a period of 3 days. (Act. sct. II. Bd. b. Apr. p. 697 bis 740.)

1287 A.D., The Jews in Bern kidnapped St. Rudolf at the Passover, horribly tortured the child and finally slit his throat. (Hein, Murer, Helvetia sancta.)

1292 A.D., In Colmar, the Jews killed a boy. (Ann. Colm., II, 30)

1293 A.D., In Krems, the Jews sacrificed a child. Two of the murderers were punished; the others saved themselves through the power of gold. (Monum. XI, 658)

1294 A.D., In Bern, the Jews murdered a child again. (Ann Colm., II, 32; Henri Desportes, Le mystere du sang, p. 70)

1302 A.D., In Reneken the same crime. (Ann. Colm. II, 32)

1303 A.D., At Weissensee in Thuringen the young student Conrad, the son of a soldier, was killed at Easter. His muscles were cut to pieces and his veins were opened in order to drain all his blood.

1305 A.D., In Prague, around Easter, a Christian, who was forced by poverty to work for the Jews, was nailed to a cross; while naked, he was beaten with rods and spat on in the face. (Tentzel)

Also if i were you i'd save local copies of these archived websites. Don't trust that it will always be there on archive.org

Medieval Britain was more 'based' than people know. *Far* more based than America, which has never fumigated any tapeworms, and which uses things like the Constitution, gun rights, and 'Judeo-Christianity' as a sort of crutch or pacifier to avoid doing much of anything that is actually based.

But I won't just state this without making the case. I will tell you what went on there.

Thankfully, an academic in National Socialist Germany, pseudonymously known as Peter Aldag, went to Britain and studied historical records in the British Museum involving tapeworms. His work ceased when a 'British' (in actuality, tapeworm) immigration officer, surnamed 'Gold', was able to prevent him from re-entering Britain. Nevertheless, his work was practically finished by that time. In any sane society, of which today there are none, his findings would routinely be displayed on television and elsewhere whenever people begin to doubt the central claims of 'anti-Semitism', all of which are indisputably correct. Some of his findings complement those in whatever the OP's image is, but I will provide here a more comprehensive account.

The tapeworms were already latched onto Norman society and started entering Britain shortly after the Norman conquest. Thus, their presence in Britain can be traced to the 1060s.

In 1144, a boy, aged 12, was crucified by tapeworms. In response, a large number of tapeworms were fumigated by the masses. There are reports that more crucifixions of this nature occurred in the following years: 1168, 1181, 1191, 1232, 1244, and 1255. The likelihood, however, is that there are many unreported crucifixions. For a tapeworm trying and failing to save himself from execution for having partook in the 1255 crucifixion confessed that they crucify Christian children *every year* to insult Jesus.

Tapeworms also murdered children by other means and for other reasons on occasions too numerous to list here. One such murder in 1239 or 1240 led to a large number of tapeworms being fumigated in June of that year.

In 1189 (not 1089, as the OP's text states), tapeworms tried to corrupt the newly coronated king, Richard I, by showing up *en masse* bearing gifts despite the king prior issuing a decree that no tapeworm show up to his coronation. The masses, incensed by their disobedience, fumigated said tapeworms. A misunderstanding that the king himself ordered the fumigation, and, furthermore, the expulsion of all tapeworms from Britain, may have spread, and thus for the rest of that day and much of the next, angry mobs fumigated tapeworms. Many tapeworms had by this point began living in fortified houses, indubitably in anticipation of the next round of violence. The mobs, unable to break into the houses, set fire to their rooves, roasting the tapeworms trapped within.

In 1190, tapeworms caused trouble at a church. Consequently, tapeworms were fumigated in that area.

The following event in March 1190 is also mentioned in the OP's image above. Angry mobs fumigated a wealthy tapeworm in a particularly impoverished part of Britain. The tapeworms in that area, fearing mass fumigation, fled into a castle, where they were given refuge. However, when the commander left the castle, the tapeworms seized control of it in his absence. The commander summoned a force and besieged the castle. Many tapeworms committed suicide. Those that surrendered were promptly fumigated.

One estimation of the number of tapeworms left in Britain after the violence of 1190 was 2,000, with the number having died in the violence of 1190 being estimated as 500. Thus Britain eradicated perhaps a fifth of its tapeworms in one year (including those in the castle that self-fumigated).

A more philo-semitic king was enthroned in 1199. More tapeworms moved into Britain. In 1203, anti-tapeworm riots broke out in London.

The events listed in OP's graphic as occurring in 1204 likely instead occurred in 1210. The specific reason for torturing those tapeworms was to get them to pay back the ill-gotten proceeds from money-related crimes they prior committed.

Another philo-semitic king was enthroned in 1216. In 1234, anti-tapeworm riots broke out in Norwich.

In 1253, a tapeworm plot to destroy both London and Northampton by means of fire was uncovered. Around forty tapeworms implicated in the plot were themselves burned to death as punishment. The Nuremberg Laws of 1935 have as a precedent a royal ordinance of 1253 which, among other things, forbade miscegenation with tapeworms.

Another tapeworm plot to destroy London by means of fire was uncovered in 1264. Before and during the Second Barons' War (1264-1267), hundreds of tapeworms, possibly 700, were fumigated in London. This is the last entry in the OP's posted image, but it may erroneously be attributed there to something usury-related.

By the 1270s, a figure given for the number of tapeworms in Britain was 16,000. Thus, over the span of eighty years, the number of tapeworms grew by 14,000.

In 1275, the 'Statute of the Jewry' was enacted, outlawing usury. By this time, the tapeworms had amassed vast wealth by means of usury. Because they paid a significant amount in tax, kings tended to favour the tapeworms. Deprived of usury, a notable increase of tapeworm participation in violent crime, such as highway robbery, was recorded in the aftermath of this statute.

Coin clipping was also endemic at this time, as was the presence of counterfeit coins. In November 1278, large numbers of tapeworms were detained and their homes searched. Large amounts of clipped and counterfeit coins were discovered, as were the tools and equipment for clipping and counterfeiting coins. By the end of 1278, the coinage had been replaced and the old coins were no longer legal tender.

Between 200 to 300 tapeworms were hanged or drowned, along with three Englishmen, for these crimes.

By 1282, the new coinage was also being clipped and counterfeited. In 1283, a commission of enquiry discovered that the tapeworms were again responsible. A royal decree of 1288 indicated that the problem had not yet been solved.

In 1288, King Edward I expelled the tapeworms from Gascony. In 1289, all tapeworms in London were imprisoned. In 1290, King Edward I decreed that any tapeworm in Britain after November 1, 1290, would be executed. The number of tapeworms in Britain, and who thus then left to avoid execution, was estimated at 15,000 to 16,000. Thus the population of tapeworms had not increased over the prior twenty years. Their destinations were chiefly France, Holland, and Belgium.

Thus concludes this brief outline of the history of tapeworms in medieval Britain. The tapeworms returned centuries later because of the fool Cromwell and his wretched republicans, and from there became much more powerful in Britain than ever before. But this history tells you many things.

Let us examine just a few. Firstly, tapeworms commit money-related crimes wherever they go. The likes of Bernie Madoff and Sam Bankman-Fried merely continue what their ancestors did. If they can't clip coins, counterfeit coins, scam, etc., those who are not peddling muddling nonsense in high-paying academic positions or who are doing other less criminal tapeworm things resort to committing money-related crimes usually not associated with tapeworms, such as burglaries and robberies. This also means that tapeworms have a tendency to accrue great wealth. However, if they are prevented from doing such things, they also have a tendency to end up wallowing in poverty and dying in ghettos. This is because they are unable to parasite effectively when hampered by 'anti-semitic' edicts, laws, regulations, rules, etc.

Secondly, the kind of ritualistic murder and other secretive, strange stuff that tapeworms get up to - perhaps the most recent example being the renewed emphasis on Epstein's island - goes back a long way. There is nothing new about the tapeworms molesting and murdering children.

Thirdly, tapeworms will try to bring about great destruction if their parasitism is threatened. Thus today we hear of what many call the 'Samson Option'. The tapeworms of the time, lacking such weapons, aimed to get as close to that as they could by aiming to burn entire cities.

Finally, and perhaps most importantly, we *can* deparasite ourselves of tapeworms. Yes, the technologies of the Whites have foolishly strengthened the tapeworms immensely. The television, in particular, greatly increased their ability to scramble the minds of much of the 'boomer' generation of White goyim. The internet, although not greatly better, has so far been an improvement, and it will remain so unless the tapeworm is able to control it as firmly as he has controlled the television. Thus, the more recent generations are comparatively unscrambled on the question of the tapeworms, and this shows that the cycle is repeating itself: that the time of the greatest philo-semitism in all of human history is breaking down, and history shows us time and time again that it is followed by a time of 'anti-semitism'. But since the tapeworm has climbed so high in this current cycle, it is quite possible that his coming fall will be to a point so low that he will not survive, and for that we all must hope.