Hospitals quietly reclassify vaccines as "biologics" to avoid direct consent for injection.
(prepareforchange.net)
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Toast message
I've been very patient with you, but now you need to substantiate your theory with proof.
Repeatedly saying, "Jewish poison" is not proof in the same way repeatedly saying, "Ghosts are real" is not proof.
This is your last chance to present your proof: you have the floor.
This. Prove this. This is the falsifiable claim you are making.
steele2 has made the (anecdotal) claim that taking Ivermectin gets rid of the flu, ostensibly because he does not experience any further ill effects after taking it.
You are claiming he is actually still sick but that the symptoms are suppressed. So what exactly makes him "healthier" for not taking Ivermectin? What are the negative effects of the flu *other* than the symptoms that aren't being dealt with, and that he can observe?
This is why stuff like this (Flat Earth, Fake Space, Terrain Theory) pisses me off; it's entirely based on attacking a mainstream model for not adequately explaining phenomenon, but then offers nowhere near that level of evidence when trying to justify an alternative theory.
Masking symptoms doesn't make you healthier. When you get cancer and have no idea why, it's probably because you masked the symptoms of your harmless cold with jewish poisons 20 years ago. Especially because cancer is just the body's last ditch effort to bag toxins (tumors) to prevent them from circulating (metastasizing). Instead what you should be asking is prove that a "virus" exists and causes the "cold" and that somehow taking jewish poison "fixes" that "virus" without any consequences later. THAT'S what needs to proven, because the burden of proof is on he who makes the claim. You made the claim, not me.
>This is why stuff like this (Flat Earth, Fake Space, Terrain Theory) pisses me off; it's entirely based on attacking a mainstream model for not adequately explaining phenomenon, but then offers nowhere near that level of evidence when trying to justify an alternative theory.
It's actually exactly the opposite. The mainstream model cannot adequately explain anything yet you accept it all as fact because jews told you so without ever proving it. You should instead be angry at globe earth, space, and germ theory since it never proved anything and is completely inadequate at describing reality while simultaneously making everyone sick, weak and retarded so jews can easily control them as Whites never unite under God's Truth against them.
>The "root cause" is toxins though, right? So by eliminating toxins, you'd eliminate disease?
>So why are we not having massive plagues like we did in medieval Europe and Asian when there are way more environmental toxins today? Did we clean them up somehow?
We do have massive plagues today all the time thanks to jewish poisons. Look at virtually all types of chronic disease. Cancer, SIDs, heart disease, you name it. These things didn't happen in medieval times, and honestly medieval people lived very long and healthy lives with longer life spans than we do in the West today unless war was involved. War was what killed them, not "starvation" or disease. And it's not *just* toxins, it's also emotional traumas as Dr. Hamer proved by curing thousands of late stage 4 terminal cancer patients before the jews killed him, made his practice illegal, smear campaigned it then practice it today in Israel. You're also ignoring the facts like how jews poisoned wells to cause the Black Plague.
>Environmental toxins like atmospheric metals, microplasrics, and EMF radation have increase dramatically in the last hundred years and are still increasing
Yes, and our health continues to worsen, not improve. I've provided several sources proving it.
>Mortality due to disease has decreased and average life expectancy has increased over the same period.
It hasn't, actually. While what you would call "infectious diseases" (even though they're not infectious nor caused by bacteria or a fake virus that doesn't exist) improved rapidly in the last 100 years, all of that improved before any "vaccines." They were improved mostly thanks to refrigerators and proper nutrition through food, which is quickly plummeting due to goyslop.
>The only places where this is not (or is less) true are places where people habitually eat feces.
Have you seen America's mortality rate recently? There's been more sudden cardiac arrest deaths in the last 5 years than there has been in the last 60+ years combined.
>All of this suggests that disease and mortality caused by disease correlate to bacteria/viruses that eat shit and not toxins.
How can they be "bacteria/viruses" when not a single study show bacteria causes any disease or illness and "viruses" have never been proven to exist? You know who said "viruses" exist? A jew. Do you know the first thing about "virology"?