New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
Link to book: https://archive.org/details/liberalismissin0000sard/page/n5/mode/2up

I think by "liberalism" the author means "classical liberalism" with something of an indifference towards morality: this would allow the "freedom" for things like abortion. He is against this kind of "neutrality" on certain topics: a State that is godless and gives excessive "freedom" to non-Christian religions for example might be absurd, as that would be giving a green light to certain pagan tribes that offer human sacrifice.

Given some of the clearly illustrated excesses of "total religious freedom", these excesses of a "pure" "classical liberalism" however do not exclude Catholics from having a kind of "religious tolerance" towards non-Catholics (Catholic encyclopedia entry on "religious toleration"): https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/14763a.htm

So I think there's a contrast between "unrestricted religious freedom" and a kind of freedom of some "religious tolerance". Frequently I have seen extremes with Vatican 2 modernists advocating perhaps for a kind of religious liberalism condemned in the above book, while I've seen "Catholic traditionalists" deny something of the religious tolerance as suggested in the linked article above.
You must log in or sign up to comment
1 comments:
WeedleTLiar on scored.co
30 days ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
He could also be referring to European Liberalism meaning support for systems other than monarchy. This would have a little bit after the Franco-Prussian War and the beginning of the dominance of Nation States.
Toast message