Hey guys, Grok and I crunched the numbers on this stuff based on real psychometric data, polygenic scores (2023–2025 GWAS papers), and inbreeding studies. It's absolutely absurd just how bad committing beastiality with a nigger is, and thats 100% how I see it now, how much "better" even extreme inbreeding is for Aryan (Northwest European/Nordic) bloodlines compared to a single mix with sub-Saharan niggers. In reality, never marry your sibling obviously, but without calling inbreeding "better" its basically impossible to really understand just how much damage beastiality causes.
Sub-Saharan Africans average 70–75 IQ at the most optimistic measures, likely sub 70~ IQ average, while Aryans (Northwest Europeans) hit 100–102. This gap shows up in everything: patents, Nobels, economic output, crime rates (blacks way higher in violence), and nation stability. Environment has absolutely nothing to do with it. Adoption/twin studies, infant tests, and polygenic scores prove that. One standard deviation gap (15 points) can be the difference between high school dropout and PhD holder. Polygenic data predicts ~80-85 IQ for a 50/50 White-black kid, regressing hard toward the black mean.
Full sibling incest (inbreeding coefficient 0.25) drops IQ ~10–15 points in the first gen, with 5–10% risk of defects. It stacks multiplicatively: by gen 3, ~30–35 point drop; gen 5, ~35–45 points. But it's mostly recessive load—stop inbreeding and outbreed to unrelated Whites, and you're back to 98% original quality in 2–3 generations. For genius parents 145–155 IQ and very clean genomes the drop is milder since their load is low to start.
Race-Mixing damage is by all measures basically permanent. Aryan × sub-Saharan cross injects low-IQ alleles that don't wash out easily. Back-cross to pure Whites every generarion halves ancestry (50% → 25% → 12.5%), but the IQ deficit lingers. At 3–6% African (after 5–6 generations), you're still 4–8 points down. At 1–2% (8–10 gens), 2–4 points down. To fully fix within 1 point of the pure Aryan mean takes 12–15 generations (~300–400 years) without selection, but in reality, it stabilizes at 3–5 points below forever due to assortative mating. The infamous violence/impulsivity alleles (like MAOA variants) stick around too.
So where is the inflection point? Where does inbreeding get worse than one mix? It depends on starting White IQ. For average 100–110.IQ Inbred line crosses are worse than a mulatto at gen 3–4. For 120 IQ: Gen 4–5. FOR 135-145 IQ: Gen 5–7. For 145-155 IQ: 7–9 generationa of sibling incest before it's worse than mixing with one single nigger animal. Essentially you could run a Pharaoh/Habsburg line for 2 centuries or more and still recover faster than fixing one-drop pollution.
To truly undo nígger admixture you'd have to breed normally for 5,000 years and even then you will still have shitskin DNA floating around in our race's genetic ether until its rooted out with CRISPR or some other technology. Nigger admixture is eternal genetic filth unless you eugenics the hell out of it for centuries.
TL;DR The one drop rule existed for a reason, and we should hold ourselves to that standard as much as we possibly can. NEVER MIX
LMAO!
> you're a literal jew whose job it is to be on sites like this
Site like what? Neither of the men on the banner of this forum were Christian, and they were both critical of it. Which you'd know if you read Mein Kampf and White Power. In fact it's a case of Christians subverting National Socialism, which is what I'm very much against.
> Cain wasn't Adam's son, but that's a separate issue.
The Bible says that he was. Genesis 4:1
And you didn't answer my question, which is very relevant for this post: if Adam and Eve only had Cain and Abel, with whom did Cain and Abel have children with?
With other people not related to Adam? So that means Adam was not the first man?
Oh, LOL, the Bible story contradicts itself within the first 4 chapters!
(Copied from Christogenea) In The SS as an Anti-Bolshevik Organization (Die Schutzstaffel als Antibolschewistische Kampforganisation) Himmler had written that “In this obeying unalterable laws are included the sacred belief of our ancestors, that everything on this earth was created by God and inspired by God. Only foolish, malicious and stupid people created this pagan fable, the horror stories, that our ancestors worshipped gods and trees. No, they were convinced in God’s ancient knowledge and ancient teachings of His Divine Order of this world, wherein we were created in His image and where the plant and the animal world co-exist.”
They were against the churches, not Christianity. Big difference. I wouldn't want anyone in the church to dictate what I do either.
If you're not a jew, you can learn here: https://mk.christogenea.org/
Cain is some of Adam. That's what the Bible says.
You haven't answered who Cain and Seth married.
> Seth would have married his sister(s)
Ah so Seth is inbred and Adam and Eve had one or many female children that the Bible doesn't even bother to mention?
And then Seth lived to be 912 years old.
You think that if our oldest Hebrew manuscripts are corrupt, that our modern English translations aren't? You understand that English is a relatively new language right?
Cain was a non and married into the tree of knowledge of good and evil, that's what half of him was. Adam was told to cling to the tree of life and he would live forever, so Seth would have followed suit in keeping with kind after kind. It's the entire reason the fall occurred, since Eve ate the fruit from the other tree - an allegory for sex. The other people were the fallen angels and their descendants. It's why race mixing is a sin in the OT, and it still is.
Scripture is very brief. It's why kids fail when they say "who made God" because that isn't the context of Scripture, only Adam's children, specifically the descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob are. You'd understand this if you listened at this random blog I keep linking.