New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
Hey guys, Grok and I crunched the numbers on this stuff based on real psychometric data, polygenic scores (2023–2025 GWAS papers), and inbreeding studies. It's absolutely absurd just how bad committing beastiality with a nigger is, and thats 100% how I see it now, how much "better" even extreme inbreeding is for Aryan (Northwest European/Nordic) bloodlines compared to a single mix with sub-Saharan niggers. In reality, never marry your sibling obviously, but without calling inbreeding "better" its basically impossible to really understand just how much damage beastiality causes.

Sub-Saharan Africans average 70–75 IQ at the most optimistic measures, likely sub 70~ IQ average, while Aryans (Northwest Europeans) hit 100–102. This gap shows up in everything: patents, Nobels, economic output, crime rates (blacks way higher in violence), and nation stability. Environment has absolutely nothing to do with it. Adoption/twin studies, infant tests, and polygenic scores prove that. One standard deviation gap (15 points) can be the difference between high school dropout and PhD holder. Polygenic data predicts ~80-85 IQ for a 50/50 White-black kid, regressing hard toward the black mean.

Full sibling incest (inbreeding coefficient 0.25) drops IQ ~10–15 points in the first gen, with 5–10% risk of defects. It stacks multiplicatively: by gen 3, ~30–35 point drop; gen 5, ~35–45 points. But it's mostly recessive load—stop inbreeding and outbreed to unrelated Whites, and you're back to 98% original quality in 2–3 generations. For genius parents 145–155 IQ and very clean genomes the drop is milder since their load is low to start.

Race-Mixing damage is by all measures basically permanent. Aryan × sub-Saharan cross injects low-IQ alleles that don't wash out easily. Back-cross to pure Whites every generarion halves ancestry (50% → 25% → 12.5%), but the IQ deficit lingers. At 3–6% African (after 5–6 generations), you're still 4–8 points down. At 1–2% (8–10 gens), 2–4 points down. To fully fix within 1 point of the pure Aryan mean takes 12–15 generations (~300–400 years) without selection, but in reality, it stabilizes at 3–5 points below forever due to assortative mating. The infamous violence/impulsivity alleles (like MAOA variants) stick around too.

So where is the inflection point? Where does inbreeding get worse than one mix? It depends on starting White IQ. For average 100–110.IQ Inbred line crosses are worse than a mulatto at gen 3–4. For 120 IQ: Gen 4–5. FOR 135-145 IQ: Gen 5–7. For 145-155 IQ: 7–9 generationa of sibling incest before it's worse than mixing with one single nigger animal. Essentially you could run a Pharaoh/Habsburg line for 2 centuries or more and still recover faster than fixing one-drop pollution.

To truly undo nígger admixture you'd have to breed normally for 5,000 years and even then you will still have shitskin DNA floating around in our race's genetic ether until its rooted out with CRISPR or some other technology. Nigger admixture is eternal genetic filth unless you eugenics the hell out of it for centuries.

TL;DR The one drop rule existed for a reason, and we should hold ourselves to that standard as much as we possibly can. NEVER MIX
You must log in or sign up to comment
15 comments:
HimmlerWasRight88 on scored.co
13 days ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror )
Important to notice that the difference between a White person and a nigger is not just IQ.

IQ just measures the ability to resolve problems like puzzles. It says nothing about how we think, what we feel, our morality, etc. In fact I'm convinced that only White people are capable of love.

Tell me about a love story between a man and a woman that doesn't originate from White people. I don't think you can.

Can-Maga on scored.co
14 days ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
Adam basically married himself, and his pure descendants, us whites, are fine. It's in Scripture that we shouldn't marry our sibling, but cousins were married often. Just look at Jacob.
-6
HimmlerWasRight88 on scored.co
13 days ago -6 points (+0 / -0 / -6Score on mirror ) 2 children
This is a thread for science, so please keep your Jewish fairy tales out of here.

By the way, if Adam was the first man and Eve the first woman and they had Cain and Abel, who did Cain and Abel have children with?
Captain_Raamsley on scored.co
13 days ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
You're gay
Can-Maga on scored.co
13 days ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
Hmm I wonder... anyways, it was forbidden in Leviticus, which is for the Israelites and not the wider Adamic people. What you're referring to is before that law.

Cain wasn't Adam's son, but that's a separate issue.

You realize Himmler and Hitler were Christian right? Hitler wanted jews out of the country, and when he arrested a jewish banker, they declared war on Germany.

It's almost like you made that username to be edgy, knowing nothing about them. That or you're a literal jew whose job it is to be on sites like this and perpetuate lies. The Bible is for White men, it was never for jews, you fag.
-2
HimmlerWasRight88 on scored.co
13 days ago -2 points (+0 / -0 / -2Score on mirror ) 1 child
> You realize Himmler and Hitler were Christian right?

LMAO!

> you're a literal jew whose job it is to be on sites like this

Site like what? Neither of the men on the banner of this forum were Christian, and they were both critical of it. Which you'd know if you read Mein Kampf and White Power. In fact it's a case of Christians subverting National Socialism, which is what I'm very much against.


> Cain wasn't Adam's son, but that's a separate issue.

The Bible says that he was. Genesis 4:1

And you didn't answer my question, which is very relevant for this post: if Adam and Eve only had Cain and Abel, with whom did Cain and Abel have children with?
With other people not related to Adam? So that means Adam was not the first man?
Oh, LOL, the Bible story contradicts itself within the first 4 chapters!
Can-Maga on scored.co
13 days ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
I didn't answer because it's obvious, Seth would have married his sister(s). The Hebrew of Genesis 4:1 is corrupt, and what we have is an interpolation that contradicts the rest of Scripture. Cain isn't even listed in the book of the generations of Adam - there's no second witness to it. Cain married into the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, the other tree in the midst of the garden. He's the son of the serpent, who was a fallen angel or their descendant.

(Copied from Christogenea) In The SS as an Anti-Bolshevik Organization (Die Schutzstaffel als Antibolschewistische Kampforganisation) Himmler had written that “In this obeying unalterable laws are included the sacred belief of our ancestors, that everything on this earth was created by God and inspired by God. Only foolish, malicious and stupid people created this pagan fable, the horror stories, that our ancestors worshipped gods and trees. No, they were convinced in God’s ancient knowledge and ancient teachings of His Divine Order of this world, wherein we were created in His image and where the plant and the animal world co-exist.”

They were against the churches, not Christianity. Big difference. I wouldn't want anyone in the church to dictate what I do either.

If you're not a jew, you can learn here: https://mk.christogenea.org/
HimmlerWasRight88 on scored.co
10 days ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Oh wow, who should I believe? The Bible, or a random blog that you keep linking?

Cain is some of Adam. That's what the Bible says.

You haven't answered who Cain and Seth married.

> Seth would have married his sister(s)

Ah so Seth is inbred and Adam and Eve had one or many female children that the Bible doesn't even bother to mention?
And then Seth lived to be 912 years old.
ScallionPancake on scored.co
13 days ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Nigger DNA is abhorrent.
genesisSOC on scored.co
13 days ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Suddenly it makes sense why jews try to say "incest" is prominent and terrible among Whites and demonize it in media and culture while they do it the most themselves.\
"Babel" also means "to mix" and "confusion"
OftenWrong on scored.co
11 days ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
this doesn't even account for those numbers being logarithmic. IQ is logarithmic so "15" points from 85-10 is not even close to the same as the 15 from 100 to 115 and so on so this is even more condemning than it obviously appears off the start
-3
HimmlerWasRight88 on scored.co
13 days ago -3 points (+0 / -0 / -3Score on mirror ) 1 child
> Full sibling incest (inbreeding coefficient 0.25) drops IQ ~10–15 points in the first gen, with 5–10% risk of defects

I'm going to need a source for that.
If a 120 IQ White breeds with his 120 IQ sister, why would the IQ be any lower? How does it work?

The possibility of genetic defects is explained because they are recessive genes, so there are more chances that they come up between siblings, but I don't even believe it's a real problem.

We have been breeding horses and dogs for thousand of years and in both cases the purest the race the better the animal is.
Captain_Raamsley on scored.co
13 days ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Ok buddy go knock up your sister then 🤷‍♂️
If you need a source for that then you're probably a little retarded.
-1
HimmlerWasRight88 on scored.co
13 days ago -1 points (+0 / -0 / -1Score on mirror )
No I'm not retarded. I have critical thinking.
As you opened a thread specifically related to inbreeding, you didn't even stop and ask yourself what the mechanism is that lowers IQ in the case of inbreeding. How does it work?

Also there's no study that claims that the loss is 10+ IQ points. You made that up, or Grok made that up.
Toast message