> was an American molecular biologist, geneticist and zoologist.
> He was part of a distributed group of researchers who were making use of the viruses that infect bacteria, called bacteriophages. He and Max Delbrück were among the leaders of this new "Phage Group", an important movement of geneticists from experimental systems such as Drosophila towards microbial genetics.
> In mid-March 1953, Watson and Crick deduced the double helix structure of DNA.
> Watson and Crick submitted a paper entitled "Molecular Structure of Nucleic Acids: A Structure for Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid" to the scientific journal Nature, which was published on April 25, 1953.
And a lot more text if you are interested.
So yes, he did contribute significantly, and the fact that we *know* about this and learn in school means yes, it was more than just published. It became common curriculum in biology lessons.
10 days ago-1 points(+0/-0/-1Score on mirror)1 child
Viruses don't exist, and I never said bacteria doesn't. The earth is not a globe. You're falling for jewish propaganda. Go on, tell me how you know viruses exist. What is the process of "purifying" and "isolating" them? What exactly are you looking at under an electron microscope? If I'm the retard, surely you know these things better than me, right?
Still waiting on you to tell me the process of how "viruses" are "isolated" and "purified" and what you're looking at under an electron microscope. Because I can tell you all of these things and why it's fake and gay, but you don't seem to know anything while blindly believing some jew. Time for some education, little bro!:
[This study](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2031349/) is the very first pioneer "proof of virus" concept that [a jew](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Landsteiner) did to try and prove "no goys we didn't poison your wells, or your food or air or radiate you with electromagnetic radiation, it's some scary fairy invisible boogy man you get from breathing people that cough!" [What he did was take a child that died of paralysis, took the spinal cord and chopped it up in a blender and added some water](https://files.catbox.moe/if605l.mp4), then had some monkeys drink it, to prove it was contagious and spreadable. Didn't work. So they injected it into the monkeys. Didn't work. So finally they drilled holes in the heads of monkeys then inject it into their brains, and when the monkeys died, they said "See! It's a 'virus'! Not us jews!" and that's it. THAT IS YOUR PROOF OF VIRUS. THAT IS ALL YOUR EVIDENCE. THAT IS WHAT ALL VIROLOGY IS AND EVERY 'SCIENTIST' SAYS TO YOU. Do you get it yet? Also, [you're looking at metal oxides under an electron microscrope](https://files.catbox.moe/mid0sf.mp4), not "viral particles."
10 days ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
Genetics as a whole is something that is quite important. Discovering elements of it like the DNA and details like that it's a double helix provides more foundation to it. I believe that is the core of his discoveries.
The implication is that there is genetic information that is passed from cell to cell and from parents to offspring. Thus various elements of the body (including brain) are inherent to one's parents, who in turn are the results of their parents - thus all the people around you, your ancestors, across centuries of time (at least!) are at least similar to you. So the idea that a person is just the result of his environment, society or culture is false. Which is the predominant ideology in the West for multiple decades.
It means a nigger is born as a nigger, and no amount of "education" will alleviate its lackluster mental capacities. Just as you cannot teach dogs to speak.
This is the connection. And this is all based on the fact that genes indeed physically exist, and aren't just some theory how things *must* be to make sense with observations. It's the logical conclusion with that as its basis, where all the various researches come together to create a coherent picture. That means Darwin's theory of evolution, but also Alfred Binet's IQ tests, the IQ tests performed world-wide, literal history across millennia are all pieces of a puzzle. I am not sure the picture is missing any piece at this point.
I mean I hope you do not consider me a racist solely out of whim or mere anecdotal experiences. There is a lot of science substantiating it. Which is why someone like James Watson would turn turbo-racist as well. Everything that followed were basically the same conclusions we have today, like Race & IQ. Something like that doesn't get acknowledgement in academia, simply because they are overwhelmingly leftist ideologues or beholden to jews, thus corrupt.
Use yandex.com to search dissident things like [this](https://www.unz.com/runz/the-forbidden-topic-race-and-iq/):
> Many journalists and academics became extremely fearful of broaching the subject of race and IQ, with even the most eminent figures sometimes suffering severe consequences when they did so. For half a century, James Watson had reigned as one of the world’s greatest scientific figures, having shared a Nobel Prize for discovering DNA in 1953 and then spending decades leading Cold Spring Harbor laboratory, which he built up into a major center of scientific research. But in 2007 while on a book-tour at the age of 79, he raised questions about the average intelligence of black Africans and was immediately subjected to a firestorm of public criticism and media vituperation, soon being stripped of many of his honors, and he later endured a second wave of vilification when similar remarks came to light in a 2018 documentary. This was a shocking fate for a scientist in his 90s who had spent his entire career at the peak of world renown and achievement.
> was an American molecular biologist, geneticist and zoologist.
> He was part of a distributed group of researchers who were making use of the viruses that infect bacteria, called bacteriophages. He and Max Delbrück were among the leaders of this new "Phage Group", an important movement of geneticists from experimental systems such as Drosophila towards microbial genetics.
> In mid-March 1953, Watson and Crick deduced the double helix structure of DNA.
> Watson and Crick submitted a paper entitled "Molecular Structure of Nucleic Acids: A Structure for Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid" to the scientific journal Nature, which was published on April 25, 1953.
And a lot more text if you are interested.
So yes, he did contribute significantly, and the fact that we *know* about this and learn in school means yes, it was more than just published. It became common curriculum in biology lessons.
[This study](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2031349/) is the very first pioneer "proof of virus" concept that [a jew](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Landsteiner) did to try and prove "no goys we didn't poison your wells, or your food or air or radiate you with electromagnetic radiation, it's some scary fairy invisible boogy man you get from breathing people that cough!" [What he did was take a child that died of paralysis, took the spinal cord and chopped it up in a blender and added some water](https://files.catbox.moe/if605l.mp4), then had some monkeys drink it, to prove it was contagious and spreadable. Didn't work. So they injected it into the monkeys. Didn't work. So finally they drilled holes in the heads of monkeys then inject it into their brains, and when the monkeys died, they said "See! It's a 'virus'! Not us jews!" and that's it. THAT IS YOUR PROOF OF VIRUS. THAT IS ALL YOUR EVIDENCE. THAT IS WHAT ALL VIROLOGY IS AND EVERY 'SCIENTIST' SAYS TO YOU. Do you get it yet? Also, [you're looking at metal oxides under an electron microscrope](https://files.catbox.moe/mid0sf.mp4), not "viral particles."
The implication is that there is genetic information that is passed from cell to cell and from parents to offspring. Thus various elements of the body (including brain) are inherent to one's parents, who in turn are the results of their parents - thus all the people around you, your ancestors, across centuries of time (at least!) are at least similar to you. So the idea that a person is just the result of his environment, society or culture is false. Which is the predominant ideology in the West for multiple decades.
It means a nigger is born as a nigger, and no amount of "education" will alleviate its lackluster mental capacities. Just as you cannot teach dogs to speak.
This is the connection. And this is all based on the fact that genes indeed physically exist, and aren't just some theory how things *must* be to make sense with observations. It's the logical conclusion with that as its basis, where all the various researches come together to create a coherent picture. That means Darwin's theory of evolution, but also Alfred Binet's IQ tests, the IQ tests performed world-wide, literal history across millennia are all pieces of a puzzle. I am not sure the picture is missing any piece at this point.
I mean I hope you do not consider me a racist solely out of whim or mere anecdotal experiences. There is a lot of science substantiating it. Which is why someone like James Watson would turn turbo-racist as well. Everything that followed were basically the same conclusions we have today, like Race & IQ. Something like that doesn't get acknowledgement in academia, simply because they are overwhelmingly leftist ideologues or beholden to jews, thus corrupt.
Use yandex.com to search dissident things like [this](https://www.unz.com/runz/the-forbidden-topic-race-and-iq/):
> Many journalists and academics became extremely fearful of broaching the subject of race and IQ, with even the most eminent figures sometimes suffering severe consequences when they did so. For half a century, James Watson had reigned as one of the world’s greatest scientific figures, having shared a Nobel Prize for discovering DNA in 1953 and then spending decades leading Cold Spring Harbor laboratory, which he built up into a major center of scientific research. But in 2007 while on a book-tour at the age of 79, he raised questions about the average intelligence of black Africans and was immediately subjected to a firestorm of public criticism and media vituperation, soon being stripped of many of his honors, and he later endured a second wave of vilification when similar remarks came to light in a 2018 documentary. This was a shocking fate for a scientist in his 90s who had spent his entire career at the peak of world renown and achievement.
I'm a racist when I notice who tries to stop me from talking about it.