Consume Product

Viruses don't exist, and I never said bacteria doesn't. The earth is not a globe. You're falling for jewish propaganda. Go on, tell me how you know viruses exist. What is the process of "purifying" and "isolating" them? What exactly are you looking at under an electron microscope? If I'm the retard, surely you know these things better than me, right?

Genetics as a whole is something that is quite important. Discovering elements of it like the DNA and details like that it's a double helix provides more foundation to it. I believe that is the core of his discoveries.

The implication is that there is genetic information that is passed from cell to cell and from parents to offspring. Thus various elements of the body (including brain) are inherent to one's parents, who in turn are the results of their parents - thus all the people around you, your ancestors, across centuries of time (at least!) are at least similar to you. So the idea that a person is just the result of his environment, society or culture is false. Which is the predominant ideology in the West for multiple decades.

It means a nigger is born as a nigger, and no amount of "education" will alleviate its lackluster mental capacities. Just as you cannot teach dogs to speak.

This is the connection. And this is all based on the fact that genes indeed physically exist, and aren't just some theory how things *must* be to make sense with observations. It's the logical conclusion with that as its basis, where all the various researches come together to create a coherent picture. That means Darwin's theory of evolution, but also Alfred Binet's IQ tests, the IQ tests performed world-wide, literal history across millennia are all pieces of a puzzle. I am not sure the picture is missing any piece at this point.

I mean I hope you do not consider me a racist solely out of whim or mere anecdotal experiences. There is a lot of science substantiating it. Which is why someone like James Watson would turn turbo-racist as well. Everything that followed were basically the same conclusions we have today, like Race & IQ. Something like that doesn't get acknowledgement in academia, simply because they are overwhelmingly leftist ideologues or beholden to jews, thus corrupt.

Use yandex.com to search dissident things like [this](https://www.unz.com/runz/the-forbidden-topic-race-and-iq/):

> Many journalists and academics became extremely fearful of broaching the subject of race and IQ, with even the most eminent figures sometimes suffering severe consequences when they did so. For half a century, James Watson had reigned as one of the world’s greatest scientific figures, having shared a Nobel Prize for discovering DNA in 1953 and then spending decades leading Cold Spring Harbor laboratory, which he built up into a major center of scientific research. But in 2007 while on a book-tour at the age of 79, he raised questions about the average intelligence of black Africans and was immediately subjected to a firestorm of public criticism and media vituperation, soon being stripped of many of his honors, and he later endured a second wave of vilification when similar remarks came to light in a 2018 documentary. This was a shocking fate for a scientist in his 90s who had spent his entire career at the peak of world renown and achievement.

You're most welcome brother