You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
7
WeedleTLiar on scored.co
4 days ago7 points(+0/-0/+7Score on mirror)3 children
I believe in helping others, but recently I've changed my ideas on *who* I should help.
I no longer believe in helping the "less fortunate". They're in a bad situation specifically because they can't (or won't) make good use of resources. No amount of help changes that.
Now, I only help people who are *better off* than I am. For one thing, there's a much higher chance they will be grateful and maybe even reward my help, which poors will never do, but I also have the comfort of knowing that, regardless of what I get out of it, my effort won't be wasted. They will put my help to good use.
I'm also not asking anyone better off than me for help. If I need something, I'll ask a poor. If they actually help, I'll reward them, if not, they can go rot.
4 days ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)1 child
In a White homogenous nation, I believe some can fall on hard times and completely turn it all around with a bit of help. Stories like that are real even now... even if only an extreme rarity.
So while I get what you're saying and think it's interesting, I can't fully square the notion as it pertains to my inner compass.
That being said, I'm in globohomo zone 1. So in actual real world practice, I'm probably a lot closer to how you operate than I think lol
Oh course, we have a moral duty to help the people in need.
However, this help also needs to come with the caveat that the people in need also must help themselves. Someone who is willing to work must be helped, even giving a job that is unnecessary, just to not make him lazy. But someone unwilling to work must be re-educated and an attempt must be made for him to be integrated into society and become a productive member.
This is why a concentration camp system works wonders, in spite of the negative connotations. A concentration camp in which the guests are made to do some manual work, like planting crops with their hands (because the point is to teach them to work), work that is not too hard or too long, then they can do sport, chant, read, eat healthy, kick any addiction, etc.
In other words, if someone is not able to take care of himself freedom must be deprived to correct him; a bit like in jail, but without the punitive element (because they haven't committed a crime).
Unfortunately in our liberal society this is not accepted, and therefore the only thing that a liberal society can do is to throw money at the problem which will incentivize more of the problem, as being unproductive is now subsidized.
But at the same time, it's also not possible to ignore the problem; if not for human decency, because the masses of anti-social people will turn out to be a problem one way or another if they are not fixed.
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is a reason why I am a National Socialist.
I no longer believe in helping the "less fortunate". They're in a bad situation specifically because they can't (or won't) make good use of resources. No amount of help changes that.
Now, I only help people who are *better off* than I am. For one thing, there's a much higher chance they will be grateful and maybe even reward my help, which poors will never do, but I also have the comfort of knowing that, regardless of what I get out of it, my effort won't be wasted. They will put my help to good use.
I'm also not asking anyone better off than me for help. If I need something, I'll ask a poor. If they actually help, I'll reward them, if not, they can go rot.
So while I get what you're saying and think it's interesting, I can't fully square the notion as it pertains to my inner compass.
That being said, I'm in globohomo zone 1. So in actual real world practice, I'm probably a lot closer to how you operate than I think lol
However, this help also needs to come with the caveat that the people in need also must help themselves. Someone who is willing to work must be helped, even giving a job that is unnecessary, just to not make him lazy. But someone unwilling to work must be re-educated and an attempt must be made for him to be integrated into society and become a productive member.
This is why a concentration camp system works wonders, in spite of the negative connotations. A concentration camp in which the guests are made to do some manual work, like planting crops with their hands (because the point is to teach them to work), work that is not too hard or too long, then they can do sport, chant, read, eat healthy, kick any addiction, etc.
In other words, if someone is not able to take care of himself freedom must be deprived to correct him; a bit like in jail, but without the punitive element (because they haven't committed a crime).
Unfortunately in our liberal society this is not accepted, and therefore the only thing that a liberal society can do is to throw money at the problem which will incentivize more of the problem, as being unproductive is now subsidized.
But at the same time, it's also not possible to ignore the problem; if not for human decency, because the masses of anti-social people will turn out to be a problem one way or another if they are not fixed.
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is a reason why I am a National Socialist.
and by everyone I mean white men. white men are the only demographic that is net positive tax - benefits over their lifetime.