I don’t understand their play. When this country fails, so does their gibs and safety in the middle east . What’s their long game in making America brown? Or do they not have that kind of foresight and just enjoy destroying Christians and Whites that much?
I know it was the Jews who opened the gates to mass immigration, but that was many decades ago. All the progressivism that they promoted is now running in autopilot and the Jews could not stop it even if they wanted to.
I was always a so-called anti-semite in the lay sense of the word. For instance, in my friendship group as a teenager, we'd call each other 'Jews' when somebody did something we disapproved of. Like, 'why did you do [insert stupid thing here], you stupid Jew?' This was before any of us was genuinely political, our lives were essentially apolitical, for politics seemed to us essentially something that the adults handled. Nevertheless, I always smelled something off about the yid and the demonology that surrounded Adolf Hitler and the Nazis. I did not understand why such well-dressed, clean, upright people were - always - the villains in those silly Hollywood films and those video games such as *Call of Duty* and *Medal of Honor*. It always seemed to me like the inverse should be the case.
In hindsight, that most elementary and most common of anti-semitisms was deficient. It was not the truth at all. For what I did not realize until around 15 years later is that the yid is, while capable of interbreeding with humans and in many respects sharing great similarity with humans, *not* human. They are mixed with humans, but they are not human. His synchrony to the point of possible hivemindedness; his possession of an unusual level of the 'Will to Power'; his fixation on victimhood, which is one of his greatest weapons (various human groups have learned to copy him in this regard); his uniformity of opinion regarding the most important things and his division of opinion regarding trivialities (yids will argue till they're black and blue over the Talmud, Marx, or Freud, but never argue that their over-representation is a problem or that they aren't the biggest victims of all time); and various other characteristics are not human characteristics. So-called anti-semitism isn't truly anti-semitism, because it still assigns humanness to the yid. True anti-semitism is to deny the humanness of the yid altogether.
Christian anti-semites like E. Michael Jones, for instance, still believe that the yid is ontologically human. That they're God's children like the rest of us and so forth. Thus the yiddish problem is purely religious: if every yid accepted Christianity, the yiddish problem would be solved. This is 'anti-semitism', not true anti-semitism.
One of the yid's many tricks is that, enabled by the fact he has members that are mixed with people from all across the racial spectrum, he poses as being closer to every human race than every human race is to each other.
The Whites think: 'Jews are closer to us than blacks and browns.' And, look!, our shared 'Judeo-Christian' heritage, and, look!, Israel is one of the only liberal democratic countries in the Middle East, which is at present also how we govern themselves. And the Muslims are our common enemy! Jews are just like us, they just look funny! We must defend 'Judeo-Christian' liberal democracy!
And the Muslim browns think: 'Jews are closer to us than Whites and blacks'. And, look!, Judaism is closer to Islam because we agree that God never took the form of a man as the Christians do. The Christian man-worshipping idolators are our common enemy! Jews are just like us but merely of a different religion, yet still 'People of the Book'.
And the blacks think: 'Jews are closer to us than Whites and browns'. And, look!, they were victims of the 'Holocaust' just as we were victims of slavery. The Whites are our common enemy! Jews are just like us, they were victims too!
The Hindus are similarly duped, again, because the Muslims are a shared enemy and because India and Israel are essentially both liberal democracies.
All of this supposed similarity couldn't be further from the truth. The reality is the human races, especially psychologically, are closer to each other - indeed, even the nigger - than the yid is to any of them, and that the aforementioned beliefs are simply beliefs that the yid promotes to ensure that the vast majority of the goyim will be on his side at any one given time.
Likewise, Christianity and Islam are closer to each other than either is to Judaism. Muslims disagree on Jesus being God, but agree that Jesus was good. Jews, however, disagree on both counts, contending that Jesus was neither God nor good. Thus, 'Judeo-Christian' and 'Judeo-Islamic' are also yiddish junk concepts, since they posit a larger divide between Christianity and Islam - and a greater similarity between Judaism and both of them - than is actually there. Again, this is promoted so that Christians and Muslims will fight each other rather than against the yid.
The mind of the yid, if we could introspect into it, would be found to be more alien to the minds of the goyim than the minds of the goyim are to each other. The yid is the undisputed master of deception, subversion, and the like - it is as though he has perfected it as an evolutionary survival strategy, improving at it with every persecution, every expulsion - and the goy cannot compete with him on these counts no matter how hard he tries. The goy simply doesn't have it within his human nature to excel in this regard.
However, the yid isn't even remotely a master of non-psychological forms of control, nor management of any kind. Historically, he has been good at getting others to fight his wars for him. But he isn't good at exercising hard power or at warfighting in his own right. Hence the weak and impoverished Hamas still existing two years later in the face of what should be a vastly superior military force. This is probably why he hasn't established permanent control over any group of goyim: his excellence as a deceiver and subverter has gotten him close many times, but his shortcomings as a controller or manager mean that he starts to err and then fail once he reaches that stage where power is essentially now his and he needs to exercise it to prevent the host from ever expelling him, which is the purpose for which he, a parasite, ultimately acquired said power. In short, he is good at acquiring power over a host, but inept at maintaining it indefinitely. The latter is his weakness upon which he needs to improve.
Thus such golems, particularly Leftism, are simply falling out of his control and trampling over him. This is why yids like Greenblatt seem to have made a shift towards the Centre and are far more critical of the Left than they were pre-October 7. The yid himself knows that the Left is growingly outside of his control and that he needs to weaken it and strengthen the Centre, which at the moment is his safest bet: the Left-Wing goy is evermore becoming anti-Zionist, and he already knows too well that the Right-Wing goy can easily become anti-semitic and thus even worse for him. The Centrist goy, less prone to both anti-Zionism from the Left and anti-semitism from the Right, is today's most useful of idiots and the yid's best bet for maintaining power.
I agree 100%.
Even a nigger in a loincloth in Africa has more in common with us Aryans: we both have a piece of land that we call home, and we both want to live off the land.
Even nomads live off the land, they just move location within a larger area.
But the Jew only lives off *other people*. The Jew is a parasite. There's another population that does the same: the gypsies. In fact Jews love the gypsies, because they feel a natural affinity.
The Jew is a parasite that is unable to live without a host. This is why there can never be peace with them.
However, the yid lacks the long-term vision, is so myopic, to see that his own actions can and do backfire on him decades to centuries down the road.
Thus he now complains about Muslim anti-Semitism in Europe, that the State of Israel is being equated to Apartheid South Africa and Nazi Germany, and countless other things. Yet he is the one who was the most pivotal in bringing about anti-White and anti-Rightist hysteria; the widespread belief in racial equality; mass immigration, including of the Muslims he complains about; and all of the other things that are causing him to lose both the State of Israel and his own protected minority status in many of the lands of the European Race.
It was the same in South Africa. The yid destroyed Apartheid and built Mandela - a yid, Lazar Sidelsky, got him into law, and yids even made Winnie's wedding dress - but did the yid want to live in the Rainbow Nation? No. For the number of yids in today's South Africa is a third or less of what it was at its zenith. The yid doesn't stay on board any ship that he sinks, he seeks to infiltrate a new ship to begin the cycle anew.
I don't think it was the yid's intent to destroy South Africa. Rather, it was to *manage* it indefinitely; for instance, to plunder all of its vast mineral wealth. However, the yid overestimated how well he could control the niggers whom he hoped to puppetize. The niggers are the ones who are actually destroying South Africa before the yid can complete stealing everything that he can. He still retains political power through Ramaphosa and the ANC, but their power is fast waning and the other, politically ascending niggers in the EFF and especially MK are ones over whom they have far less control. Hence the yid fleeing what he hoped to instead control and parasitize indefinitely.
There is no reason to believe that the yid will stop making such mistakes any time soon. And the goyim profit from such mistakes.