MuH gIBs!
(media.scored.co)
The rest must all be doing unpaid volunteer work. As highly skilled doctors and engineers, that's very noble of them
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
18 comments:
17
6 days ago
17 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+17Score on mirror
)
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
Those jobs should have gone to whites. The only refugees a place as far north as sweden should be getting should be from Ukraine. Someone going across half the planet to get gibs isnt a migrant, theyre a parasite.
They aren't refugees.
They are invaders.
Not even invaders. They are trash subhumans imported by the jews. Their purpose is to be worthless, raping leeches who reproduce like rats. They didn't "invade" in a sense that they did it on their own volition. They are also not immigrants, they just show up with no plan or purpose.
It's hard to find a correct word to describe them.
It's hard to find a correct word to describe them.
jobs at what, goyslop? delivering drugs to fellow shitskins?
Imagine the following scenario. 162,000 foreigners arrive over the course of a year in, say, the Federal Republic of Nigeria. The Federal Government of Nigeria surmises a year later that only 462 of them are working. The rest are involved in criminality of all sorts, are spunging off of Nigerians, and otherwise have come to be a problem.
What do you think that the response would be? Firstly, I presume that the Federal Government would want to deport them all. Nigeria has, or at least had, the state capacity to do mass deportations. Thus, over two million foreign niggers, mostly Ghanaian, were deported from Nigeria in 1983. Thus, they have already demonstrated that they can develop both the will to mass deport foreigners and the capacity to realize their will. If inept Nigeria has mass deported millions, there is no excuse for anyone else who tries to say that it is implausible, unfeasible, and the like to deport millions, especially when their state capacity is almost certainly superior, if not vastly superior, to that of Nigeria.
Secondly, now let us assume for the sake of argument that this was not the government response but that the statistics became public knowledge. What do you think that the response would be? I presume that the public outcry would be so strong to the point that the government would feel that they have no choice but to accept the protester demands. Thus, it would not even matter if the government itself was sympathetic to the foreigners. The foreigners' lives would be impossibilized regardless. Seeing the writing on the wall, many would be leaving of their own accord.
The social movements, initially merely protesting with placards, would soon become the nucleus for violent, bloodthirsty crowds. Niggers would be 'necklaced' - burned to death by means of having a flaming tyre placed around oneself. Crowds would be throwing their shirts and pouring petrol onto these flaming niggers to keep them barbecuing. Other niggers macheted to death; others still stoned to death. Many residences would be aflame. Many streets would be awash with blood.
Contrast this to the actual case at hand: Sweden. The government's response? Import more foreigners, so that the 162,000 are merely a subset of millions. The public's response? In large part, passive acceptance. The foreigners' response? A growing fearlessness. And if anyone is to meet a violent death at the hands of crowds in today's Sweden, it will not be anyone non-white. And who will be fleeing Sweden, having seen the writing on the wall? The natives.
I wonder how it is that the Whites, who have transformed this world by means of their intelligence to such a great extent that many of these simians would not even exist today were it not for them, suddenly become quite possibly and paradoxically the world's most retarded people when faced with the issue of race. Race turns the mind of the Whites into mush. Any non-pathological being, even of dim intellect, would swiftly surmise that these 162,000 are simply of net detriment and should be eliminated by any means necessary. There is no 'if' nor 'but'. There is no consultation or negotiation. If peaceful protests are ignored, violent riots will take swiftly their place, and if those violent rioters do not have their demands met, the government will swiftly be overthrown.
That course of events is how this scenario would play out in any sane time and place. That is how this would play out even in a place as dimwitted and simple-minded as Equatorial Guinea, Haiti, or Liberia. The intellect of the mid-wit is a curse: too intelligent to act on animalistic instinct as does the nigger swinging a panga as he engages in mass murder, yet too stupid to eliminate yiddish and/or Leftist conceptual junk such as 'anti-racism' from his mind. The mid-wit is not suited for this world: those both duller and smarter than he will inherit the earth: the duller, because abstract nonsense like 'anti-racism' is beyond their understanding; the smarter, because though they understand such abstract nonsense, they simply reject it. It is only the mid-wit who is both smart enough to understand it and stupid enough to accept it.
What do you think that the response would be? Firstly, I presume that the Federal Government would want to deport them all. Nigeria has, or at least had, the state capacity to do mass deportations. Thus, over two million foreign niggers, mostly Ghanaian, were deported from Nigeria in 1983. Thus, they have already demonstrated that they can develop both the will to mass deport foreigners and the capacity to realize their will. If inept Nigeria has mass deported millions, there is no excuse for anyone else who tries to say that it is implausible, unfeasible, and the like to deport millions, especially when their state capacity is almost certainly superior, if not vastly superior, to that of Nigeria.
Secondly, now let us assume for the sake of argument that this was not the government response but that the statistics became public knowledge. What do you think that the response would be? I presume that the public outcry would be so strong to the point that the government would feel that they have no choice but to accept the protester demands. Thus, it would not even matter if the government itself was sympathetic to the foreigners. The foreigners' lives would be impossibilized regardless. Seeing the writing on the wall, many would be leaving of their own accord.
The social movements, initially merely protesting with placards, would soon become the nucleus for violent, bloodthirsty crowds. Niggers would be 'necklaced' - burned to death by means of having a flaming tyre placed around oneself. Crowds would be throwing their shirts and pouring petrol onto these flaming niggers to keep them barbecuing. Other niggers macheted to death; others still stoned to death. Many residences would be aflame. Many streets would be awash with blood.
Contrast this to the actual case at hand: Sweden. The government's response? Import more foreigners, so that the 162,000 are merely a subset of millions. The public's response? In large part, passive acceptance. The foreigners' response? A growing fearlessness. And if anyone is to meet a violent death at the hands of crowds in today's Sweden, it will not be anyone non-white. And who will be fleeing Sweden, having seen the writing on the wall? The natives.
I wonder how it is that the Whites, who have transformed this world by means of their intelligence to such a great extent that many of these simians would not even exist today were it not for them, suddenly become quite possibly and paradoxically the world's most retarded people when faced with the issue of race. Race turns the mind of the Whites into mush. Any non-pathological being, even of dim intellect, would swiftly surmise that these 162,000 are simply of net detriment and should be eliminated by any means necessary. There is no 'if' nor 'but'. There is no consultation or negotiation. If peaceful protests are ignored, violent riots will take swiftly their place, and if those violent rioters do not have their demands met, the government will swiftly be overthrown.
That course of events is how this scenario would play out in any sane time and place. That is how this would play out even in a place as dimwitted and simple-minded as Equatorial Guinea, Haiti, or Liberia. The intellect of the mid-wit is a curse: too intelligent to act on animalistic instinct as does the nigger swinging a panga as he engages in mass murder, yet too stupid to eliminate yiddish and/or Leftist conceptual junk such as 'anti-racism' from his mind. The mid-wit is not suited for this world: those both duller and smarter than he will inherit the earth: the duller, because abstract nonsense like 'anti-racism' is beyond their understanding; the smarter, because though they understand such abstract nonsense, they simply reject it. It is only the mid-wit who is both smart enough to understand it and stupid enough to accept it.
No need to imagine this. In 2023-24 Iran and Pakistan each deported one million Afghan refugees because they were causing to much strain on infrastructure and social services.
If these countries which are much poorer can do it, then so can we. It's a matter of will, not a matter of ability.
If these countries which are much poorer can do it, then so can we. It's a matter of will, not a matter of ability.
> Race turns the mind of the Whites into mush. Any non-pathological being, even of dim intellect, would swiftly surmise that these 162,000 are simply of net detriment and should be eliminated by any means necessary
Well said. It's akin to the leftists clapping their hands at a crow that can pattern match and yet scolding a child for realizing that blacks and browns are violent retards
Well said. It's akin to the leftists clapping their hands at a crow that can pattern match and yet scolding a child for realizing that blacks and browns are violent retards
What is this “came to” shit?
Who let them in? What were the names of the politicians, what were the names of the comptrollers that issued the funds, what were the names of the NGO’s that coordinated the logistics? What are the names of the individuals in executive positions within these companies?
Who paid for the transportation? Who owned the transportation?
Who rounded them up?
These questions will never be answered. They just want you to think this just magically happened all on its own.
Who let them in? What were the names of the politicians, what were the names of the comptrollers that issued the funds, what were the names of the NGO’s that coordinated the logistics? What are the names of the individuals in executive positions within these companies?
Who paid for the transportation? Who owned the transportation?
Who rounded them up?
These questions will never be answered. They just want you to think this just magically happened all on its own.
# SO SEND THE OTHERS BACK!
Oh, that's right. The (((European Commission))) is destroying White nations.
Oh, that's right. The (((European Commission))) is destroying White nations.
Toast message