You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
3
LGBTQIAIDS on scored.co
6 days ago3 points(+0/-0/+3Score on mirror)
To be fair to that speechless Republican nigger who seemed to be malfunctioning as his deficient brain circuits struggled to process the question, niggers don't seriously care about the Israel-Gaza conflict or any other newsworthy conflict. They only care about conflicts that involve a significant number of their own kind. However, the evasiveness of the rest of these people struck me as bizarre back when this video first emerged as it does now. I suspect that the Israel-Gaza conflict hasn't changed people like this either, even though it means that they're growingly out of lockstep with their voters.
I see these nigger social media accounts; they don't like the way that predominant narratives such as Russia-Ukraine and Israel-Palestine are ones that do not centre them. Niggers - unfortunately, being the most ethnocentric of all bar the yids - have always got to be the centre of everything. Thus, they wonder why it is that people turn a blind eye to Sudan and the myriad other conflicts in Africa.
'Like, isn't it anti-black and/or White supremacist to be hearing about the Palestinians and Ukrainians but not the Sudanese?'
The answer is: African conflicts, unlike 'Western' conflicts, are dime a dozen. That eliminates their newsworthiness, since newsworthiness correlates with uniqueness (as well as certain other things such as negativity: people constantly prefer negative rather than positive news). If the mass media ramped up the negrolatry to 101%, the news would be completely dominated by events in the war-torn parts of Cameroon, Ethiopia, Sudan, and the Sahel.
The mass media, being far more Leftist than Afrocentric, doesn't want that because it would be clearly 'racist': nothing would ever be newsworthy except graphic displays of dead and starving niggers. Anglophone niggers killed by Francophone niggers in Cameroon, their villages burning in the background. The former Boko Haram, now Islamic State's West African branch, making a comeback in Nigeria, overrunning the Federal Republic's niggers. The pan-Africanist niggers in the Sahel killed by Islamic State- and al-Qaeda-affiliated niggers.
What kind of message does that send about niggers? Messages that the Left cannot stomach, such as that niggers are murderous, violent, etc. Simply turning a blind eye to nigger conflicts is actually the best thing for negrolatry overall, since focusing on it would lead large numbers of people to 'Afrophobic' conclusions. We already have narratives like '14-56' or whatever it currently is, and the 'you would never say that to a black person in real life' default response to 'racists' (Why? Because even nigger apologists understand and unwittingly admit through uttering such words that niggers are murderous and violent.) Narratives that would be far more prominent if mass media was also feeding into them rather than just the internet. Unlike White Leftists and yids, niggers are too stupid to understand that, however. They just can't stand not being the centre of attention even if it would harm them to be centred.
Another obvious answer is: the yids do not care about Sudaniggers, whereas they clearly have various reasons, including religious and revenge-driven, to eliminate the Palestinians and Ukrainians (e.g. hatred of 'Banderites', hatred of Russia because of its turn away from yidolatry towards the end of Stalin's rule). From their perspective, their enemies are killing each other in the Ukraine while they're slowly but successfully killing other enemies in Palestine.
Yids will one day regret that they ever tried to use niggers as bio-weapons. Arabs and Whites have tried for centuries and failed to control niggers, the Chinese will learn that they are uncontrollable the hard way, and yids are only good at psychological control—i.e. control through deceptive and subversive ideas, ideologies, values, etc.—all things which are too abstract for most niggers. Controlling the stupid through the abstract is hard: you can only control more intelligent, 'mid-wit' beings that way. With the stupid, the half-wit, you need what is concrete. Yet when it comes down to hard power, yids are remarkably inept, hence Hamas still existing two years later despite being an impoverished, weak organization withstanding an absolute onslaught from a vastly larger and better equipped force.
As for abstraction and stupidity, Marxist movements won in many parts of Africa, and yet where is their progress towards communism decades later? There is none, for Marxism is too complicated for niggers. When the Chinese and Koreans cannot progress towards communism, how can niggers? How do you explain concepts, models, paradigms, theories, etc. to those who are borderline if not outright retarded? Thus, imagine the headache of trying to turn all niggers into Zionist sympathizers?
Thus, we return to my earlier point: the yid will regret ever using the nigger as a bio-weapon. Niggers don't care about anyone outside of their own race, do not seriously adhere to ideologies of any kind, and are simply impossible to control except through hard power. That is how Africa self-regulates: routine application of 'jungle justice' or 'street justice'. If you do something wrong, other people will kill you. The African mind knows that it understands the language of force: niggers change behaviour not because of rewards or sermons but only when you aim guns at them.
I see these nigger social media accounts; they don't like the way that predominant narratives such as Russia-Ukraine and Israel-Palestine are ones that do not centre them. Niggers - unfortunately, being the most ethnocentric of all bar the yids - have always got to be the centre of everything. Thus, they wonder why it is that people turn a blind eye to Sudan and the myriad other conflicts in Africa.
'Like, isn't it anti-black and/or White supremacist to be hearing about the Palestinians and Ukrainians but not the Sudanese?'
The answer is: African conflicts, unlike 'Western' conflicts, are dime a dozen. That eliminates their newsworthiness, since newsworthiness correlates with uniqueness (as well as certain other things such as negativity: people constantly prefer negative rather than positive news). If the mass media ramped up the negrolatry to 101%, the news would be completely dominated by events in the war-torn parts of Cameroon, Ethiopia, Sudan, and the Sahel.
The mass media, being far more Leftist than Afrocentric, doesn't want that because it would be clearly 'racist': nothing would ever be newsworthy except graphic displays of dead and starving niggers. Anglophone niggers killed by Francophone niggers in Cameroon, their villages burning in the background. The former Boko Haram, now Islamic State's West African branch, making a comeback in Nigeria, overrunning the Federal Republic's niggers. The pan-Africanist niggers in the Sahel killed by Islamic State- and al-Qaeda-affiliated niggers.
What kind of message does that send about niggers? Messages that the Left cannot stomach, such as that niggers are murderous, violent, etc. Simply turning a blind eye to nigger conflicts is actually the best thing for negrolatry overall, since focusing on it would lead large numbers of people to 'Afrophobic' conclusions. We already have narratives like '14-56' or whatever it currently is, and the 'you would never say that to a black person in real life' default response to 'racists' (Why? Because even nigger apologists understand and unwittingly admit through uttering such words that niggers are murderous and violent.) Narratives that would be far more prominent if mass media was also feeding into them rather than just the internet. Unlike White Leftists and yids, niggers are too stupid to understand that, however. They just can't stand not being the centre of attention even if it would harm them to be centred.
Another obvious answer is: the yids do not care about Sudaniggers, whereas they clearly have various reasons, including religious and revenge-driven, to eliminate the Palestinians and Ukrainians (e.g. hatred of 'Banderites', hatred of Russia because of its turn away from yidolatry towards the end of Stalin's rule). From their perspective, their enemies are killing each other in the Ukraine while they're slowly but successfully killing other enemies in Palestine.
Yids will one day regret that they ever tried to use niggers as bio-weapons. Arabs and Whites have tried for centuries and failed to control niggers, the Chinese will learn that they are uncontrollable the hard way, and yids are only good at psychological control—i.e. control through deceptive and subversive ideas, ideologies, values, etc.—all things which are too abstract for most niggers. Controlling the stupid through the abstract is hard: you can only control more intelligent, 'mid-wit' beings that way. With the stupid, the half-wit, you need what is concrete. Yet when it comes down to hard power, yids are remarkably inept, hence Hamas still existing two years later despite being an impoverished, weak organization withstanding an absolute onslaught from a vastly larger and better equipped force.
As for abstraction and stupidity, Marxist movements won in many parts of Africa, and yet where is their progress towards communism decades later? There is none, for Marxism is too complicated for niggers. When the Chinese and Koreans cannot progress towards communism, how can niggers? How do you explain concepts, models, paradigms, theories, etc. to those who are borderline if not outright retarded? Thus, imagine the headache of trying to turn all niggers into Zionist sympathizers?
Thus, we return to my earlier point: the yid will regret ever using the nigger as a bio-weapon. Niggers don't care about anyone outside of their own race, do not seriously adhere to ideologies of any kind, and are simply impossible to control except through hard power. That is how Africa self-regulates: routine application of 'jungle justice' or 'street justice'. If you do something wrong, other people will kill you. The African mind knows that it understands the language of force: niggers change behaviour not because of rewards or sermons but only when you aim guns at them.