You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
1
Zrupsloohg on scored.co
1 month ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)
I appreciate the candid defense. There were 13 links in total, some of which weren't clearly distinguished from one another for the sake of brevity. The most important thing to know about Nick Fuentes is that he only cares about himself and this is reflected in all of his actions.
Regarding the "second point", there were two clips regarding Fuentes and his stance on the Tate brothers. The first where he argues they should be imprisoned, regardless of their "redpilling". Today, Fuentes praises Andrew Tate for being "based" and "redpilled on women". Once it became beneficial for him to partner with the Tate's, he [began relentlessly shutting down all criticism of them](https://web.archive.org/web/20251102040210if_/https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GyqdzWDWwAEgh6O.jpg).
Regarding Nick's stance on Trump, this is probably one of the best cases of his inconsistency. I won't deny that political stances develop over time, but for Fuentes, [Trump was always someone to leech political capital from](https://web.archive.org/web/20251102090441if_/https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1830041275950653440/pu/vid/avc1/1280x720/QB5lM5xMf94NIx7r.mp4). Even as he "declared war" on Trump in the 2024, he claimed wasn't because of his zionist history or jewish family, but out of concerns of his personnel's loyalty.
"[Trump is no longer an agent in the sense that he is not the engine of his own movement. […] There definitely were [external influences within Trump 2016], but they didn't appear to be in the driver's seat like they are now. Trump is basically just a non-factor at this point.](https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1829293067620212736/pu/vid/avc1/720x720/3fUfRrSQvcYilThW.mp4)"
"[If you are not absolutely loyal to Donald Trump, if you are not supportive of his claims of election denial and the coup in 2020, you have no business of being at the senior level of the Trump campaign, the Trump presidential transition and– God forbid– a second Trump administration.](https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1823556680476712962/vid/avc1/1198x676/2HebeXQGfh8Y4EEz.mp4)" (Timestamp 9:35)
Even prior to the 2024 election, Fuentes would make sporadic but dismissive comments about Trump's jewish connections. There was no sudden epiphany. He tacitly revealed that his opposition to Trump would boost his viewership. I would provide the clip (from some point between Nov '24 – Jan '25), but, unfortunately, you'll just have to take me at my word.
Regarding his homosexuality, there were two clips in addition to the liked tweet. The [third clip](https://web.archive.org/web/20250822062843if_/https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1955729513851052040/vid/avc1/1920x1078/2cEmxZzDcPjAPBUj.mp4) is from this August, where Fuentes reminiscences over his "catboy era" that he was shamed out of. Are straight men known to ironically go through a "catboy era" and [host a catboy discord channel](https://youtu.be/zCCExGrExkk&t=71s)? It doesn't help his case that [he's repulsed by the thought of being in a "traditional marriage"](https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1894977961339527168/pu/vid/avc1/1920x1080/Bq7oZkv9t9LyiJR2.mp4).
I assume the "6th point" is about the one he admits to being open to accepting foreign backing against America. As of March 2024, Nick Fuentes [reiterated that he would side with China against America](https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1912289145789075457/vid/avc1/1272x720/z_7BexIJWxYc7r6G.mp4).
Since you bring up George Lincoln Rockwell, it's fitting to mention that [Nick Fuentes disavowed him](https://www.bitchute.com/video/9I2wSeSoPbbg). He most recently said within the last year (no clip, unfortunately) that Rockwell was burning in hell.
None of this even touches his suspicious treatment and company following January 6th, or the pedophile he knowingly partnered with. As recently as the Tucker Carlson interview, Nick Fuentes admitted to keeping jewish company and [idolizing Stalin](https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1982976131708973056/vid/avc1/884x494/zkNJaO1hzFMhisWt.mp4). Overall, Nick Fuentes isn't someone anyone on the "right" should be following.
Regarding the "second point", there were two clips regarding Fuentes and his stance on the Tate brothers. The first where he argues they should be imprisoned, regardless of their "redpilling". Today, Fuentes praises Andrew Tate for being "based" and "redpilled on women". Once it became beneficial for him to partner with the Tate's, he [began relentlessly shutting down all criticism of them](https://web.archive.org/web/20251102040210if_/https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GyqdzWDWwAEgh6O.jpg).
Regarding Nick's stance on Trump, this is probably one of the best cases of his inconsistency. I won't deny that political stances develop over time, but for Fuentes, [Trump was always someone to leech political capital from](https://web.archive.org/web/20251102090441if_/https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1830041275950653440/pu/vid/avc1/1280x720/QB5lM5xMf94NIx7r.mp4). Even as he "declared war" on Trump in the 2024, he claimed wasn't because of his zionist history or jewish family, but out of concerns of his personnel's loyalty.
"[Trump is no longer an agent in the sense that he is not the engine of his own movement. […] There definitely were [external influences within Trump 2016], but they didn't appear to be in the driver's seat like they are now. Trump is basically just a non-factor at this point.](https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1829293067620212736/pu/vid/avc1/720x720/3fUfRrSQvcYilThW.mp4)"
"[If you are not absolutely loyal to Donald Trump, if you are not supportive of his claims of election denial and the coup in 2020, you have no business of being at the senior level of the Trump campaign, the Trump presidential transition and– God forbid– a second Trump administration.](https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1823556680476712962/vid/avc1/1198x676/2HebeXQGfh8Y4EEz.mp4)" (Timestamp 9:35)
Even prior to the 2024 election, Fuentes would make sporadic but dismissive comments about Trump's jewish connections. There was no sudden epiphany. He tacitly revealed that his opposition to Trump would boost his viewership. I would provide the clip (from some point between Nov '24 – Jan '25), but, unfortunately, you'll just have to take me at my word.
Regarding his homosexuality, there were two clips in addition to the liked tweet. The [third clip](https://web.archive.org/web/20250822062843if_/https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1955729513851052040/vid/avc1/1920x1078/2cEmxZzDcPjAPBUj.mp4) is from this August, where Fuentes reminiscences over his "catboy era" that he was shamed out of. Are straight men known to ironically go through a "catboy era" and [host a catboy discord channel](https://youtu.be/zCCExGrExkk&t=71s)? It doesn't help his case that [he's repulsed by the thought of being in a "traditional marriage"](https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1894977961339527168/pu/vid/avc1/1920x1080/Bq7oZkv9t9LyiJR2.mp4).
I assume the "6th point" is about the one he admits to being open to accepting foreign backing against America. As of March 2024, Nick Fuentes [reiterated that he would side with China against America](https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1912289145789075457/vid/avc1/1272x720/z_7BexIJWxYc7r6G.mp4).
Since you bring up George Lincoln Rockwell, it's fitting to mention that [Nick Fuentes disavowed him](https://www.bitchute.com/video/9I2wSeSoPbbg). He most recently said within the last year (no clip, unfortunately) that Rockwell was burning in hell.
None of this even touches his suspicious treatment and company following January 6th, or the pedophile he knowingly partnered with. As recently as the Tucker Carlson interview, Nick Fuentes admitted to keeping jewish company and [idolizing Stalin](https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1982976131708973056/vid/avc1/884x494/zkNJaO1hzFMhisWt.mp4). Overall, Nick Fuentes isn't someone anyone on the "right" should be following.