You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
1
weak_plenty on scored.co
18 hours ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)3 children
I don't know if this is the machinations of ZOG. If someone said "We must kill all Christians," would that be protected free speech, or a direct call to violence? Someone [screenshotted these comments](https://nitter.net/HasanKhxnx/status/1984009575058829726) that he made. And while he says that this person took those comments out of context, he didn't provide any context, and I don't think that person did. Here are the most relevant snippets:
>We must eliminate the Jews. It's the only solution at this point.
We hate the Jews and Muslims and must eliminate them.
At some point Christians are going to have to wake up and realize one day we will have to kill them all.
As a reference point, Nick Fuentes pointed out that Josh Hammer said that Tucker Carlson is a fox in the hen house who must be neutralized, which Fuentes says is calling for Tucker's assassination. Is this meaningfully different from saying that we must kill an entire group, because it's directed at one specific person? I honestly don't know, but I don't think this is as clear-cut as "The police are investigating me because I said something against Jewish people."
16 hours ago3 points(+0/-0/+3Score on mirror)1 child
That kind of thing gets said literally a million times a day with other ethnic/religious groups. "White people should all be killed and eliminated from the earth." You can report these and X may or may not delete it, and there is possibility they could suspend or even permanently ban the account, but it isn't very likely. However, very rarely will police get involved since it happens so often and is almost untrackable. What the catalyst was here, I feel, is that he was a vet and was very vocal about his enjoyment of the second amendment. The "anti-semitic rhetoric" on top of those other things lets them add a little note to his record. One of the cops seemed to be writing down his license plate number and vehicle make. I'm sure they will be watching to see if he screws up on the smallest traffic violation.
I see what you're saying, and I don't disagree. I wish the laws in American applied the same standard regardless of the group, which they currently rarely do. The guy in this video reminds me of the beginning of the Ruby Ridge fiasco.
> Is this meaningfully different from saying that we must kill an entire group, because it's directed at one specific person?
Oh absolutely, it's a completely different thing.
Saying to kill an entire group is a political idea, because it's something that can only be achieved collectively with government power. Therefore it's speech, because it's an abstract concept.
Conversely, inciting to kill person X is a true incitement to committing a crime, which is realistic and immediately dangerous.
>We must eliminate the Jews. It's the only solution at this point.
We hate the Jews and Muslims and must eliminate them.
At some point Christians are going to have to wake up and realize one day we will have to kill them all.
As a reference point, Nick Fuentes pointed out that Josh Hammer said that Tucker Carlson is a fox in the hen house who must be neutralized, which Fuentes says is calling for Tucker's assassination. Is this meaningfully different from saying that we must kill an entire group, because it's directed at one specific person? I honestly don't know, but I don't think this is as clear-cut as "The police are investigating me because I said something against Jewish people."
Oh absolutely, it's a completely different thing.
Saying to kill an entire group is a political idea, because it's something that can only be achieved collectively with government power. Therefore it's speech, because it's an abstract concept.
Conversely, inciting to kill person X is a true incitement to committing a crime, which is realistic and immediately dangerous.