You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
7
devotech2 on scored.co
2 days ago7 points(+0/-0/+7Score on mirror)2 children
The post-shooting vindication of kirk feels really astroturfed and weird. Sure, jews probably shot him, but he made *one* vague statement about a singular group of jewish donors being suspicious, and everything else about him having allegedly turned on them is hearsay that is entirely unprovable either way... because he's dead.
He did more for the zionist lobby than any other pundit in america, but he lost his usefulness because that lobby itself is losing every bit of momentum that it once had and kirk wasnt helping to stop young people from turning against israel. So he was shot to create a martyr to do the thing and worsen the left-right psyop so that jews might step out of everyone's focus.
Maybe he would have went the way of tucker carlson, maybe he wouldn't have. Who knows? He's dead, but he didn't do much of anything to warrant a complete retcon of everything he ever did, he just died young and people mythologize anyone who dies young. If he was shot solely for being pro and then anti-israel (which there's no concrete proof he was), they would have hit carlson with a minuteman nuke at this point.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
I think that it's a concoction of both genuine schizos and well poisoners coming up with whatever the fuck they want to. These types could be well paid and successful fiction authors, maybe even write scripts for movies or stories for video games, but choose to just do mental gymnastics online for free.
But they're both serving the same purpose. One on purpose and one accidentally. They're creating a myth for zio-conservatives and the nu-right to both rally around together, an american Lei Feng if you will. The charlie kirk myth will go further in future years, and there will be a perfect kirk for both dissident conservatives and mainstream faggots.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
He did more for the zionist lobby than any other pundit in america, but he lost his usefulness because that lobby itself is losing every bit of momentum that it once had and kirk wasnt helping to stop young people from turning against israel. So he was shot to create a martyr to do the thing and worsen the left-right psyop so that jews might step out of everyone's focus.
Maybe he would have went the way of tucker carlson, maybe he wouldn't have. Who knows? He's dead, but he didn't do much of anything to warrant a complete retcon of everything he ever did, he just died young and people mythologize anyone who dies young. If he was shot solely for being pro and then anti-israel (which there's no concrete proof he was), they would have hit carlson with a minuteman nuke at this point.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
But they're both serving the same purpose. One on purpose and one accidentally. They're creating a myth for zio-conservatives and the nu-right to both rally around together, an american Lei Feng if you will. The charlie kirk myth will go further in future years, and there will be a perfect kirk for both dissident conservatives and mainstream faggots.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed