You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
1
steele2 on scored.co
1 month ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
Shareholders exist both under NatSoc and Free Market Capitalism.
I'd argue the booming US Free Market Capitalist economy and the booming NatSoc German economy happened because at those points in history, the jew banking parasites weren't a factor.
Hitler banned usury and exiled the Rothschilds after forcing them to scrub his bathroom floors.
USA's booming economy occurred during a period when the USA has two ((( Federal Reserves ))) which each only lasted a handful of years and, although ((( toxic ))), weren't active for long enough to do great harm.
I suspect both systems were exceptional, but the NatSocs was superior because it had protections against the jew and political corruption which the US Constitution lacked.
1 month ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
I think we mostly agree on that.
I'd merely caution against putting your faith into a system that, by definition, has no obligation to a nation and its people.
I'd further argue it was the relative stability, rich resources, and industriousness of the American people that made the free market great, not vice-versa.
In fact, it's the work-ethics and ingenuity of the people above all other factors.
Japan, for instance, has produced successful economies under the Shogunate, the Emperor, and democratic rule alike, in spite of being notoriously poor in resources.
I'd argue the booming US Free Market Capitalist economy and the booming NatSoc German economy happened because at those points in history, the jew banking parasites weren't a factor.
Hitler banned usury and exiled the Rothschilds after forcing them to scrub his bathroom floors.
USA's booming economy occurred during a period when the USA has two ((( Federal Reserves ))) which each only lasted a handful of years and, although ((( toxic ))), weren't active for long enough to do great harm.
I suspect both systems were exceptional, but the NatSocs was superior because it had protections against the jew and political corruption which the US Constitution lacked.
I'd merely caution against putting your faith into a system that, by definition, has no obligation to a nation and its people.
I'd further argue it was the relative stability, rich resources, and industriousness of the American people that made the free market great, not vice-versa.
In fact, it's the work-ethics and ingenuity of the people above all other factors.
Japan, for instance, has produced successful economies under the Shogunate, the Emperor, and democratic rule alike, in spite of being notoriously poor in resources.
Putin made interesting attempts to force foreign-owned corporations to invest their profits into the Russian economy.
But I wonder if it is possible for any modern economic system to function without CEOs prioritizing shareholders over citizens.