Leftists are historically illiterate.
(media.scored.co)
This meme is giving me a seizure
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
15 comments:
3
1 month ago
3 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+3Score on mirror
)
1 child
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
2
1 month ago
2 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+2Score on mirror
)
Pure schizo.
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
It irritates me when liberals criticize capitalism based on nations where every institution has been subverted by the jew and their economy has been turned into s usury inflationary scam that is designed to destroy nations.
Free Market Capitalism is what fueled the USA's breathtaking transformation from a clutch of hard-working Christian settlers into the world's richest and most powerful nation within four generations.
Free Market Capitalism is what fueled the USA's breathtaking transformation from a clutch of hard-working Christian settlers into the world's richest and most powerful nation within four generations.
>Free Market Capitalism is what fueled the USA's breathtaking transformation from a clutch of hard-working Christian settlers into the world's richest and most powerful nation within four generations.
And National Socialist economics turned the decrepit Weimar Republic into a powerhouse within a few years, in spite of war reparations and the damage done by the Great Depression.
Americans have been raised for generations to venerate the "free market" as the supposedly only system that can bring about economic prosperity.
Which is patently untrue, as further demonstrated by the fact that the once dominant US industry has been replaced by the aptly named Rust Belt, while communist China became the far more productive economy in its stead.
Which is not happening by chance, but by design: Under contemporary western capitalism, the people serve the benefit of the market, when it ought to be the other way around.
The Supreme Court even confirmed this as early as 1919, in Dodge v. Ford Motor Co.
The Court confirmed that corporations have no obligation to benefit their employees or customers, much less society as a whole. Their only obligation is to the shareholders.
And National Socialist economics turned the decrepit Weimar Republic into a powerhouse within a few years, in spite of war reparations and the damage done by the Great Depression.
Americans have been raised for generations to venerate the "free market" as the supposedly only system that can bring about economic prosperity.
Which is patently untrue, as further demonstrated by the fact that the once dominant US industry has been replaced by the aptly named Rust Belt, while communist China became the far more productive economy in its stead.
Which is not happening by chance, but by design: Under contemporary western capitalism, the people serve the benefit of the market, when it ought to be the other way around.
The Supreme Court even confirmed this as early as 1919, in Dodge v. Ford Motor Co.
The Court confirmed that corporations have no obligation to benefit their employees or customers, much less society as a whole. Their only obligation is to the shareholders.
Shareholders exist both under NatSoc and Free Market Capitalism.
I'd argue the booming US Free Market Capitalist economy and the booming NatSoc German economy happened because at those points in history, the jew banking parasites weren't a factor.
Hitler banned usury and exiled the Rothschilds after forcing them to scrub his bathroom floors.
USA's booming economy occurred during a period when the USA has two ((( Federal Reserves ))) which each only lasted a handful of years and, although ((( toxic ))), weren't active for long enough to do great harm.
I suspect both systems were exceptional, but the NatSocs was superior because it had protections against the jew and political corruption which the US Constitution lacked.
I'd argue the booming US Free Market Capitalist economy and the booming NatSoc German economy happened because at those points in history, the jew banking parasites weren't a factor.
Hitler banned usury and exiled the Rothschilds after forcing them to scrub his bathroom floors.
USA's booming economy occurred during a period when the USA has two ((( Federal Reserves ))) which each only lasted a handful of years and, although ((( toxic ))), weren't active for long enough to do great harm.
I suspect both systems were exceptional, but the NatSocs was superior because it had protections against the jew and political corruption which the US Constitution lacked.
I think we mostly agree on that.
I'd merely caution against putting your faith into a system that, by definition, has no obligation to a nation and its people.
I'd further argue it was the relative stability, rich resources, and industriousness of the American people that made the free market great, not vice-versa.
In fact, it's the work-ethics and ingenuity of the people above all other factors.
Japan, for instance, has produced successful economies under the Shogunate, the Emperor, and democratic rule alike, in spite of being notoriously poor in resources.
I'd merely caution against putting your faith into a system that, by definition, has no obligation to a nation and its people.
I'd further argue it was the relative stability, rich resources, and industriousness of the American people that made the free market great, not vice-versa.
In fact, it's the work-ethics and ingenuity of the people above all other factors.
Japan, for instance, has produced successful economies under the Shogunate, the Emperor, and democratic rule alike, in spite of being notoriously poor in resources.
> Free Market Capitalism is what fueled the USA's breathtaking transformation
This is not true at all.
America was funded with the government having [heavy control of the economy](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_School_(economics)) and, in more recent times, with [the government regulating private economic activity](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sherman_Antitrust_Act).
Laissez-faire has come to America only with Reagan. It has *never* been a part of the American culture or history - this is one of the greatest misconceptions Americans have.
Today America in the [ranking of economic freedom](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Index_of_Economic_Freedom#2025) is only 26. There are a dozen European countries that have more free market than America.
FYI u/Mellop
This is not true at all.
America was funded with the government having [heavy control of the economy](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_School_(economics)) and, in more recent times, with [the government regulating private economic activity](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sherman_Antitrust_Act).
Laissez-faire has come to America only with Reagan. It has *never* been a part of the American culture or history - this is one of the greatest misconceptions Americans have.
Today America in the [ranking of economic freedom](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Index_of_Economic_Freedom#2025) is only 26. There are a dozen European countries that have more free market than America.
FYI u/Mellop
The government didn't even take income tax back then and it was so small that economic red tape and politicians were rarer than Bigfoot sightings.
That's so fucking retarded. Hating capitalism was the one thing Fascists, Nazis and Communists agreed on.
Toast message