You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
4
HimmlerWasRight88 on scored.co
12 days ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)1 child
> They have no loyalty.
They really don't because they are an inferior species. Their instinct of self-preservation is purely individualistic. Niggers ate their own children before White Christians taught them to not do that.
Niggers could never, ever win a war. Because fighting a war requires a *collectivist* instinct of self preservation, i.e. racial and group solidarity.
This is why the Germans fought so well in WWII, and that's why niggers and sandniggers have never won a war ever.
> They would have fought back against lynchings back when that was a thing
It was never a thing. The KKK was lynching *criminals* of all races. There never was any persecution against niggers as a whole in America.
> they would have overthrown slavers
And then do what? Niggers would have been completely unable to survive on their own, it made perfect sense for them to be happy to be in slavery which was basically like being an au pair. If a nigger was made free he would have starved to death, it's not that he could have opened a business.
12 days ago3 points(+0/-0/+3Score on mirror)1 child
>It was never a thing. The KKK was lynching criminals of all races. There never was any persecution against niggers as a whole in America.
Oh I know, but to them, it was targeted against them. They specifically lived in fear of it and believed it to be a racial issue. If they actually cared at all about their own people, then they would have done something about the lynchers who made no attempt to hide themselves at all. But they didn't, and they were more interested in just not being lynched themselves than helping their fellow black man.
We hear about king Leopold's treatment of the natives in the congo. Where was the black resistance to it? They had the capability to do so, there were almost no actual Belgians *at all* in the congo. Oh wait... niggers were the ones who were doing the enforcing actually.
Whenever they have cared about their collective interest, it has been a foreign concept pushed on them by an outside entity, either by a dissemination of propaganda or by the work of an indoctrinated representative with uncharacteristically high IQ. Like the soviet union with Rhodesia, or jews with Martin luther king. But even when these movements achieve success, they go right back to where they were immediately.
Of course, there's an untapped resource here. The almost entirely black force publique of the congo free state killed more niggers than any group of people ever. And they did it for some pennies and firewater from europe. You can probably pay off niggers today with Hennessy and extra food stamps to enact tnd
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
> to them, it was targeted against them. They specifically lived in fear of it and believed it to be a racial issue.
How do you know this?
I believe that back then niggers in America were not hostile towards White people and didn't feel attacked or discriminated in any way. If they did, at the very least they would have left. You cannot just assume that there was racial tension back then, especially because almost everyone was Christian, and Christians love niggers because according to their religion a nigger is literally their brother.
It's only in the 20th century that the Jews have put racial grievances in their head, and racial tensions have started.
If they did put that idea into their head, it was put into their head long before by the emancipation proclamation and the civil war. That was the first time they started to view evil whitey as a collective enemy against the blacks.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
They really don't because they are an inferior species. Their instinct of self-preservation is purely individualistic. Niggers ate their own children before White Christians taught them to not do that.
Niggers could never, ever win a war. Because fighting a war requires a *collectivist* instinct of self preservation, i.e. racial and group solidarity.
This is why the Germans fought so well in WWII, and that's why niggers and sandniggers have never won a war ever.
> They would have fought back against lynchings back when that was a thing
It was never a thing. The KKK was lynching *criminals* of all races. There never was any persecution against niggers as a whole in America.
> they would have overthrown slavers
And then do what? Niggers would have been completely unable to survive on their own, it made perfect sense for them to be happy to be in slavery which was basically like being an au pair. If a nigger was made free he would have starved to death, it's not that he could have opened a business.
Oh I know, but to them, it was targeted against them. They specifically lived in fear of it and believed it to be a racial issue. If they actually cared at all about their own people, then they would have done something about the lynchers who made no attempt to hide themselves at all. But they didn't, and they were more interested in just not being lynched themselves than helping their fellow black man.
We hear about king Leopold's treatment of the natives in the congo. Where was the black resistance to it? They had the capability to do so, there were almost no actual Belgians *at all* in the congo. Oh wait... niggers were the ones who were doing the enforcing actually.
Whenever they have cared about their collective interest, it has been a foreign concept pushed on them by an outside entity, either by a dissemination of propaganda or by the work of an indoctrinated representative with uncharacteristically high IQ. Like the soviet union with Rhodesia, or jews with Martin luther king. But even when these movements achieve success, they go right back to where they were immediately.
Of course, there's an untapped resource here. The almost entirely black force publique of the congo free state killed more niggers than any group of people ever. And they did it for some pennies and firewater from europe. You can probably pay off niggers today with Hennessy and extra food stamps to enact tnd
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
How do you know this?
I believe that back then niggers in America were not hostile towards White people and didn't feel attacked or discriminated in any way. If they did, at the very least they would have left. You cannot just assume that there was racial tension back then, especially because almost everyone was Christian, and Christians love niggers because according to their religion a nigger is literally their brother.
It's only in the 20th century that the Jews have put racial grievances in their head, and racial tensions have started.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed