I Still Think About This a Lot
(media.scored.co)
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Toast message
The modern judeo-churchians literally have more fidelity to the written word of the Bible than you.
> we have 1500 years of theology to prove that those same crusaders followed Christ's teachings to the word.
Funny how everyone does this "Christianity tells you to kill your enemies actually" bit with zero elaboration, even after I bring plain receipts proving the opposite. *I just gave you Christ's teachings, "to the word."*
> Jesus Christ told us to drown people who lead children astray with mafia-style weights.
He literally didn't.
> God in the Old Testament has prescribed execution for sin many a time.
Neat. Show me where he prescribes it today.
> Christ Himself took up a whip
And what did he do when Peter took up a sword?
> you know who He didn't resist, who He said to pay taxes to? the White Romans who would later spread Christianity.
So you concede it was the Romans that killed Christ and not the jews? Hm. Okay.
> if only you spent all this time trying to "build more bridges" between you and me rather than burning them by acting no better than a divisive, subversive jew. look at the effort you've spent to alienate the banner that 80% of Whites are ultimately united under.
Ad hominem.
My point is Christians aren't worth building bridges with if they can't renounce their pacifism. And *not* just by outsourcing it by saying "the state can use violence!" Which I already know is the bulk of that "1500 years of theology" you're referring to. If anything, that just highlights that the early record contradicts you.
Matthew 18:6 - “If anyone causes one of these little ones—those who believe in me—to stumble, it would be better for them to have a large millstone hung around their neck and to be drowned in the depths of the sea."
if your problem is that Christians aren't violent i would gladly prove you wrong with a first-hand example.
> If anyone causes one of these little ones—those who believe in me—to stumble, it would be better for them to have a large millstone hung around their neck
> **it would be better for**
Your claim is that Jesus "told us to drown" such people. This is not that. Not remotely. He's alluding to the grim fate that awaits them after death for their sins, similar to how he said it would be better for Judas to have "never been born."
If this is the lens through which you interpret the Bible, then you are going to go literally cut off your hand the next time it causes you to sin, correct?
Literal Hispanic-tier reading comprehension. I can't even tell if you're serious anymore.
> if your problem is that Christians aren't violent i would gladly prove you wrong with a first-hand example.
"Truly I say unto you, if a man stirs you to wrath by the things he says on the internet, you are to go to him, and literally kill him."
-Jesus, probably.
Unbelievable.
And the cherry on top is that you're never going to make that threat to the ones who have actually destroyed your society. Just other White nationalists.
Yeah this religion is the answer to defeating jews and not destabilizing White solidarity I think.
anyway, it's clear to me you're only here to stir trouble, as all you do is attack Whiteness. if you're not a jew, then you should know well what's been said about what should be done to traitors.
Edit: Nvm, fixed.
Anyways, yes. I'm not a Christian, and I do have contempt for your your beliefs, because they enable White genocide. The current state of the entire White Western world is an explicit testament to this.
I do not desire this outcome, which is why I'm willing to rail against these "backwards beliefs" (aptly put btw) that contribute to it, no matter how angry it makes people.
The meme is also a grossly disingenuous non sequitur, as it is typically used to depict a leftist trying to convince you to accept trans children or something. I'm showing you that your religion teaches you to be a pacifist, and you should reject that.
And furthermore, this argument *would* work on me. It's part of why I stopped being a Christian.
Everything I've said is empirically verifiable, both historically and textually. You've successfully refuted precisely *none* of my points. Just baseless insults and emotional lashing out.
"The more I debated with them, the more familiar I became with their argumentative tactics. At the outset they counted upon the stupidity of their opponents; but when they got so tied up that they couldn't find a way out, they played the trick of acting as innocent simpletons. Should that fail, in spite of their tricks of logic, they acted as if they couldn't understand the counter arguments, and jumped away to another topic of discussion.
They stated truisms and platitudes; and if you accepted these, they applied them to other matters of an essentially different nature. If you pointed this out, they escaped again and avoided any precise statement. Whenever one tried to get a firm grip on one of these apostles, one's hand grasped only a jelly like slime-that slipped through the fingers, and then recombined into a solid mass a moment later."