You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
1
el_hoovy on scored.co
14 days ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
pick one or the other, Godless idiot. can you be a Christian without following the Bible or Jesus Christ, like modern judeo-churchians, or do you have to follow every word? either way your ramblings lose out - if it's the former, then the crusaders who resisted evil with swords and the people who took back Spain are Christians all the same, and if it's the latter, we have 1500 years of theology to prove that those same crusaders followed Christ's teachings to the word.
Jesus Christ told us to drown people who lead children astray with mafia-style weights. God in the Old Testament has prescribed execution for sin many a time. Christ Himself took up a whip and violently drove out merchants, you know the kind, from a temple. He called them snakes and vipers, undermined them everywhere He went, rebuked them publicly to the point they wanted to execute Him. disorderly conduct, harassment, assault with a deadly weapon, inciting rebellion.
you know who He didn't resist, who He said to pay taxes to? the White Romans who would later spread Christianity.
if only you spent all this time trying to "build more bridges" between you and me rather than burning them by acting no better than a divisive, subversive jew. look at the effort you've spent to alienate the banner that 80% of Whites are ultimately united under.
> can you be a Christian without following the Bible or Jesus Christ, like modern judeo-churchians
The modern judeo-churchians literally have more fidelity to the written word of the Bible than you.
> we have 1500 years of theology to prove that those same crusaders followed Christ's teachings to the word.
Funny how everyone does this "Christianity tells you to kill your enemies actually" bit with zero elaboration, even after I bring plain receipts proving the opposite. *I just gave you Christ's teachings, "to the word."*
> Jesus Christ told us to drown people who lead children astray with mafia-style weights.
He literally didn't.
> God in the Old Testament has prescribed execution for sin many a time.
Neat. Show me where he prescribes it today.
> Christ Himself took up a whip
And what did he do when Peter took up a sword?
> you know who He didn't resist, who He said to pay taxes to? the White Romans who would later spread Christianity.
So you concede it was the Romans that killed Christ and not the jews? Hm. Okay.
> if only you spent all this time trying to "build more bridges" between you and me rather than burning them by acting no better than a divisive, subversive jew. look at the effort you've spent to alienate the banner that 80% of Whites are ultimately united under.
Ad hominem.
My point is Christians aren't worth building bridges with if they can't renounce their pacifism. And *not* just by outsourcing it by saying "the state can use violence!" Which I already know is the bulk of that "1500 years of theology" you're referring to. If anything, that just highlights that the early record contradicts you.
Matthew 18:6 - “If anyone causes one of these little ones—those who believe in me—to stumble, it would be better for them to have a large millstone hung around their neck and to be drowned in the depths of the sea."
if your problem is that Christians aren't violent i would gladly prove you wrong with a first-hand example.
...Do you really not see how that's a self own in light of your earlier claim?
> If anyone causes one of these little ones—those who believe in me—to stumble, it would be better for them to have a large millstone hung around their neck
> **it would be better for**
Your claim is that Jesus "told us to drown" such people. This is not that. Not remotely. He's alluding to the grim fate that awaits them after death for their sins, similar to how he said it would be better for Judas to have "never been born."
If this is the lens through which you interpret the Bible, then you are going to go literally cut off your hand the next time it causes you to sin, correct?
Literal Hispanic-tier reading comprehension. I can't even tell if you're serious anymore.
> if your problem is that Christians aren't violent i would gladly prove you wrong with a first-hand example.
"Truly I say unto you, if a man stirs you to wrath by the things he says on the internet, you are to go to him, and literally kill him."
-Jesus, probably.
Unbelievable.
And the cherry on top is that you're never going to make that threat to the ones who have actually destroyed your society. Just other White nationalists.
Yeah this religion is the answer to defeating jews and not destabilizing White solidarity I think.
[is this you?](https://files.catbox.moe/1ec8af.png)
anyway, it's clear to me you're only here to stir trouble, as all you do is attack Whiteness. if you're not a jew, then you should know well what's been said about what should be done to traitors.
Anyways, yes. I'm not a Christian, and I do have contempt for your your beliefs, because they enable White genocide. The current state of the entire White Western world is an explicit testament to this.
I do not desire this outcome, which is why I'm willing to rail against these "backwards beliefs" (aptly put btw) that contribute to it, no matter how angry it makes people.
The meme is also a grossly disingenuous non sequitur, as it is typically used to depict a leftist trying to convince you to accept trans children or something. I'm showing you that your religion teaches you to be a pacifist, and you should reject that.
And furthermore, this argument *would* work on me. It's part of why I stopped being a Christian.
Everything I've said is empirically verifiable, both historically and textually. You've successfully refuted precisely *none* of my points. Just baseless insults and emotional lashing out.
Jesus Christ told us to drown people who lead children astray with mafia-style weights. God in the Old Testament has prescribed execution for sin many a time. Christ Himself took up a whip and violently drove out merchants, you know the kind, from a temple. He called them snakes and vipers, undermined them everywhere He went, rebuked them publicly to the point they wanted to execute Him. disorderly conduct, harassment, assault with a deadly weapon, inciting rebellion.
you know who He didn't resist, who He said to pay taxes to? the White Romans who would later spread Christianity.
if only you spent all this time trying to "build more bridges" between you and me rather than burning them by acting no better than a divisive, subversive jew. look at the effort you've spent to alienate the banner that 80% of Whites are ultimately united under.
The modern judeo-churchians literally have more fidelity to the written word of the Bible than you.
> we have 1500 years of theology to prove that those same crusaders followed Christ's teachings to the word.
Funny how everyone does this "Christianity tells you to kill your enemies actually" bit with zero elaboration, even after I bring plain receipts proving the opposite. *I just gave you Christ's teachings, "to the word."*
> Jesus Christ told us to drown people who lead children astray with mafia-style weights.
He literally didn't.
> God in the Old Testament has prescribed execution for sin many a time.
Neat. Show me where he prescribes it today.
> Christ Himself took up a whip
And what did he do when Peter took up a sword?
> you know who He didn't resist, who He said to pay taxes to? the White Romans who would later spread Christianity.
So you concede it was the Romans that killed Christ and not the jews? Hm. Okay.
> if only you spent all this time trying to "build more bridges" between you and me rather than burning them by acting no better than a divisive, subversive jew. look at the effort you've spent to alienate the banner that 80% of Whites are ultimately united under.
Ad hominem.
My point is Christians aren't worth building bridges with if they can't renounce their pacifism. And *not* just by outsourcing it by saying "the state can use violence!" Which I already know is the bulk of that "1500 years of theology" you're referring to. If anything, that just highlights that the early record contradicts you.
Matthew 18:6 - “If anyone causes one of these little ones—those who believe in me—to stumble, it would be better for them to have a large millstone hung around their neck and to be drowned in the depths of the sea."
if your problem is that Christians aren't violent i would gladly prove you wrong with a first-hand example.
> If anyone causes one of these little ones—those who believe in me—to stumble, it would be better for them to have a large millstone hung around their neck
> **it would be better for**
Your claim is that Jesus "told us to drown" such people. This is not that. Not remotely. He's alluding to the grim fate that awaits them after death for their sins, similar to how he said it would be better for Judas to have "never been born."
If this is the lens through which you interpret the Bible, then you are going to go literally cut off your hand the next time it causes you to sin, correct?
Literal Hispanic-tier reading comprehension. I can't even tell if you're serious anymore.
> if your problem is that Christians aren't violent i would gladly prove you wrong with a first-hand example.
"Truly I say unto you, if a man stirs you to wrath by the things he says on the internet, you are to go to him, and literally kill him."
-Jesus, probably.
Unbelievable.
And the cherry on top is that you're never going to make that threat to the ones who have actually destroyed your society. Just other White nationalists.
Yeah this religion is the answer to defeating jews and not destabilizing White solidarity I think.
anyway, it's clear to me you're only here to stir trouble, as all you do is attack Whiteness. if you're not a jew, then you should know well what's been said about what should be done to traitors.
Edit: Nvm, fixed.
Anyways, yes. I'm not a Christian, and I do have contempt for your your beliefs, because they enable White genocide. The current state of the entire White Western world is an explicit testament to this.
I do not desire this outcome, which is why I'm willing to rail against these "backwards beliefs" (aptly put btw) that contribute to it, no matter how angry it makes people.
The meme is also a grossly disingenuous non sequitur, as it is typically used to depict a leftist trying to convince you to accept trans children or something. I'm showing you that your religion teaches you to be a pacifist, and you should reject that.
And furthermore, this argument *would* work on me. It's part of why I stopped being a Christian.
Everything I've said is empirically verifiable, both historically and textually. You've successfully refuted precisely *none* of my points. Just baseless insults and emotional lashing out.