I remember my mom telling me back in the 80s that we can't cut the niggers off of social welfare because they would riot. I mean, more than they already do, I guess, since we were well familiar with black riots back in the 80s.
If we actually cut niggers off of food stamps, which if the shut down continues past November 1st, looks like it might actually happen, what would happen next?
* Maybe some niggers would get jobs. I'm fine with that.
* Maybe some niggers would starve. Again, I see no problem with that.
* Maybe some niggers would turn to crime. I mean, more than usual. This is really easy to fix. It would probably involve removing a lot of prosecutors and judges from office, or bypassing them altogether. (Maybe Trump can send the national guard our way?)
* Maybe some niggers would riot. I'm fine with that too. Burn down their own neighborhoods, shut down all their local businesses.
I really don't see a downside to any of this.
I voted for this. Let's do it!
In a righteous country, these niggers would be hunted and exterminated to more manageable numbers
Except (((the system))) literally pays then to exist (and reproduce)
Despite that, they still commit violent crime because nigs are going to nig
So nothing changes?
> Except (((the system))) literally pays then to exist (and reproduce)
It's almost like Nature knows how to handle them
Maybe we should let Nature do her thing.
> Despite that, they still commit violent crime because nigs are going to nig
I find it laughable that in today's world people say things like "If you do X niggers are going to commit crimes!" as if that can ever be an argument not to do X. They're going to commit crimes anyways, so considering whether they might commit crimes or not is a pointless waste of time.