New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
whatlike_withacloth on scored.co
20 days ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Guess it depends on how you define "frames." If each pixel is a frame? Sure, I guess, then you combine a bunch of "frames" to make a composite image (an actual frame). But yea considering he has to take about a million pixels while pulsing the laser to generate a single *actual* frame.

Then again, CRT TVs kinda worked on the same principle - beaming a point of light at the TV and scanning it back and forth/top-bottom really fast. And you would still call each finished... "rendering(?)" of the beam's path a "frame."

Sure, I'll give it to him for the cool points.
ScallionPancake on scored.co
19 days ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Yeah it’s certainly cool for sure. But it’s not accurate to call it a “2 billion fps video camera” like in OPs title. That would be truly impressive if it was.
Toast message