**[Thread in question](https://communities.win/c/ConsumeProduct/p/16bimbshcv/retarded-shill-faggot-says-epsta/c/4TvATJDmVEX)**
---
The post against Insurgent gained far more traction than I would have ever anticipated. About a year ago the complaints were limited to a very vocal minority including the OP. The complaints at the time were low effort nazi memes, harassment of patriots.win moderators and users, being a shill with an agenda of diluting the discussion and ensuring ConsumeProduct stays a containment board, vote manipulation and long lists of alleged alts, some real, quite a lot lacking any justification. About a dozen people (the afforementioned vocal minority) quit ConPro entirely over Insurgent being allowed to stay here, having pretty much ruined Arete's viability as a platform in the process. That entire chat had devolved into constant infighting, until eventually everyone left ConsumeProduct for good.
That all seems to have changed.
The people who frequented the Arete chat are not a representative sample of ConsumeProduct's user base, so I thought I'd ask this question here.
Do you agree with u/assttaskmanager's stance against Insurgent? Is him being allowed to post really such a significant issue as it is made out to be (i.e. actively harming the forum and a coordinated attack on it)?
Please share your opinion, even if that is simply to abstain from the drama.
[Message the modmail](https://communities.win/send?user=c:ConsumeProduct) if you prefer not to have your comment publicly posted.
I'd vote for banning the alts, but let him keep his main account. That way he can easily be blocked by individuals who don't want to see his kikery and observed for the laughs by everyone else. Also remove his voting abilities.
Last, if he uses different IP addresses for each alt, I wanna know what VPN service he uses.
That's the current policy and it's clearly not working.