You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
12
LGBTQIAIDS on scored.co
23 days ago12 points(+0/-0/+12Score on mirror)
Didn't this very same Mark Levin say that if the State of Israel nukes Europe they will deserve it for insufficiently opposing anti-semitism?
Levin focuses on all of the sanctioned talking points: the Democrats are Marxists, 'identity politics' is bad (except for his kind), the Constitution needs to be defended (although Levin also wants to amend it). This way, Republicans never see Race or anything else that is more important than the constitution, opposing 'identity politics', and being a Cold Warrior.
The main function of 'conservative' overt bagellers is that seeing them stops conservatives from making the Left-bageller association and becoming anti-semites. You are encouraged to see that Levin, Shapiro, and a few others like that faggot Dave Rubin are yids so that you do *not* see Tony Blinken, Merrick Garland (Garfinkel), Jared Polis (faggot governor of Colorado), J. B. Pritzker (governor of Illinois), Josh Shapiro (governor of Pennsylvania), Rahm Emanuel, Jill Stein, and the myriad other yids in the Democratic Party and the wider Left, intermarried into the political classes (like Kamala's husband, Chelsea Clinton's husband, and Hunter Biden's wife), and everywhere else. The 'conservative' bagellers keep you weak while the bagellers on the Left deliver all the killing blows.
'But they aren't all bad, just look at Mark Levin and Ben Shapiro!', says the duped liberal-conservative for the umpteenth time. Becoming an anti-semite would be easy for liberal-conservatives if covering all bases wasn't part of the bageller survival strategy, since they would plainly see, clear as day, that every single one is against them. If the Rightmost parts of the political spectrum, which they fear the most, were more philo-semitic, they would control them, too, as they control everything else. Since they can't control them, they have to resort to repression.
The bagellers are so successful at covering all bases, with the help of a particular dispensationalism (the State of Israel is the Israel whose existence is required for the Second Coming of Jesus), that it has led to the ridiculous situation that the Republicans are more philo-semitic than the Democrats, even though Republican bagellers are few and far between. This is perhaps because religious arguments, and, by extension, 'Judeo-Christian' arguments, are less effective on the Left.
Levin focuses on all of the sanctioned talking points: the Democrats are Marxists, 'identity politics' is bad (except for his kind), the Constitution needs to be defended (although Levin also wants to amend it). This way, Republicans never see Race or anything else that is more important than the constitution, opposing 'identity politics', and being a Cold Warrior.
The main function of 'conservative' overt bagellers is that seeing them stops conservatives from making the Left-bageller association and becoming anti-semites. You are encouraged to see that Levin, Shapiro, and a few others like that faggot Dave Rubin are yids so that you do *not* see Tony Blinken, Merrick Garland (Garfinkel), Jared Polis (faggot governor of Colorado), J. B. Pritzker (governor of Illinois), Josh Shapiro (governor of Pennsylvania), Rahm Emanuel, Jill Stein, and the myriad other yids in the Democratic Party and the wider Left, intermarried into the political classes (like Kamala's husband, Chelsea Clinton's husband, and Hunter Biden's wife), and everywhere else. The 'conservative' bagellers keep you weak while the bagellers on the Left deliver all the killing blows.
'But they aren't all bad, just look at Mark Levin and Ben Shapiro!', says the duped liberal-conservative for the umpteenth time. Becoming an anti-semite would be easy for liberal-conservatives if covering all bases wasn't part of the bageller survival strategy, since they would plainly see, clear as day, that every single one is against them. If the Rightmost parts of the political spectrum, which they fear the most, were more philo-semitic, they would control them, too, as they control everything else. Since they can't control them, they have to resort to repression.
The bagellers are so successful at covering all bases, with the help of a particular dispensationalism (the State of Israel is the Israel whose existence is required for the Second Coming of Jesus), that it has led to the ridiculous situation that the Republicans are more philo-semitic than the Democrats, even though Republican bagellers are few and far between. This is perhaps because religious arguments, and, by extension, 'Judeo-Christian' arguments, are less effective on the Left.