Consume Product

There's a world of difference between sanctioning Uganda because the Museveni government ushered in new anti-LGBT laws, which stem from the thought that said laws violate the concepts of inalienable freedom and human rights, and the idea that someone, including White people, intentionally promote homosexuality in Africa for the explicit purpose of trying to eradicate the African race. That's just conspiracy nonsense. If Whites had the resolve to eradicate negroids, which they do not, they would come up with a plan *far* better than trying to turn every negro into a homo-negro.

Whites get blamed for strange plots such as the idea that in Rhodesia Whites poisoned clothes with a substance that seeps through skin and gave them to negroids suspected of being insurgents so that they would die if they put them on. Or that Ebola vaccines are a plot to sterilize or kill negroids.

Which do you think is the better plan if you wanted to wipe out every last negroid? The Ebola vaccine turning out to be something malicious plan makes orders of magnitude more sense than the laughable plan of trying to 'turn all the blacks gay'.

The Namibian EFF's arguments are senseless. It's like saying that there would be no problem whatsoever with LGBT *if* it wasn't a White plot to destroy them. So, if you somehow prove to them that it isn't a White plot, they'd have no reason left not to be full-blown pro-LGBT like their South African counterparts. That isn't being anti-LGBT. It's being pro-LGBT but with a retarded conspiratorial caveat. 'Being a bum-driller is fine, it's just when Whitey promotes it that it becomes a problem.'

A big proponent of this conspiracy theory in America, whose name I cannot recall, turned out to be homosexual himself.