Consume Product

The difference is that it's right on display on livestream. People aren't normally exposed to such things.

You should think outside the box of what is expected for us, but what affects "normal" people.

https://archive.is/W5NgK

To use the dog as a background prop like all the other kitschy bullshit streamers decorate their rooms with.

Do you not know what a commie is?

turkroach + "secular" islam + leftism = ......

Do you need it explained lol.

That's Sam Hyde's job

What kind of retarded take is this? The dog did nothing wrong, nothing deserving of discipline. He flipped out over his dog standing up from its bed. He shocked the dog for no reason. The dog yelped, which leads me to believe the intensity of the shock is more than the dog could handle (he’s apparently done this multiple times), though I have seen dogs yelp even when shock or vibrating collars are set very low. Either way, he reprimanded the dog for existing, basically.

Regardless of the animal, we treat them with love and kindness, even if their ultimate end is to supply us with food. Dogs are high up on a westerner's list of animals to protect at all costs. We bred them to work with and for us, and now they’ve become an integral party of many families as reliable companions. Animal cruelty of any kind is unacceptable.

You seem to be making a false dichotomy, as if we can’t house dogs *and* house the homeless. Those are two completely unrelated topics. You wanna take a hobo into your home and feed and clothe him?

>like of housing them rather than homeless people too, all these kinds of things

At the risk of sounding inflamatory: fuck homeless people.

Homeless people are the 1% of 1% of losers. Not only are they so retarded that they can't find shelter in first world countries, they must also, by definition, be such assholes that they have neither a single friend or family member who would put up with their shit rather than let them freeze to death.

I would share my home with feral racoons before I shared it with a homeless person.

If you have money that you *desperately* need to give away to convince yourself that you're a good person, give it to someone with more than you because at least they'll spend it on something worthwhile, instead of something stupid like a homeless person.

That's stupid. Some animals are food, others are friends. It's simple as that.

> if we're ok killing animals for food... this in comparison is not as bad?

You are a moral degenerate.

To kill an animal to eat it is the highest virtue. Animals should all wish they could be so lucky to be chosen to be eaten by a human. It would be like being chosen by Julius Caesar to stand on the front lines in an upcoming battle. Only the strongest, healthiest, best bred animals are even eligible for harvest.

The method of slaughter is important, of course. We want to do it with as little suffering as possible. I have found that cutting the jugulars with a very sharp knife to be almost an instant death, with hardly any reaction from the animal. They feel a sharp pain and go to sleep.

To cause unnecessary suffering, or to prolong suffering needlessly, especially for creatures that has no will of its own is the epitome of wastefulness and evil.

Holy shit I thought these b12 deficient retards all died out in 2012

You want to know how I know you’re a retarded kike!