New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
42
posted 1 month ago by arrowFunc on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +42Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
bluewhiteandred on scored.co
1 month ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
Blood libel may be low because there were some accepted disproofs of it in the past, but I could see this being a thing currently... It is not a part of Judaism but would be a corruption of Judaism if it was a thing

AI:

> Although the Catholic Church officially repudiated the blood libel, with Pope Innocent IV denouncing the accusations in 1247 and Pope Gregory X condemning them again in 1271, these official denials were often ignored, and the myth persisted throughout Europe and beyond.

Papal Protection of the Jews Encyclical (1200s): https://www.papalencyclicals.net/greg10/g10jprot.htm

Note that this article isnt totally accurate:

infogalactic.com/info/Blood_Libel

There were some child saints who were allegedly killed by Jews, like: http://infogalactic.com/info/Simon_of_Trent
HimmlerWasRight88 on scored.co
1 month ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror )
> It is not a part of Judaism but woukd be a corruption of Judaism if it was a thing

Ah yes, mutilating a child penis and sucking his blood is part of the standard Judaism, but using Christian children's blood for rituals is a corruption of Judaism.
Toast message