As for Protestants i already know they're kiked to the boot but i'd like to know whats the general consesus on what is the most based sect of Christianity, as i am not highly informed on this matter, thanks.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
2
reddeer20000 on scored.co
1 month ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy were united as 1 church with different rites up until around the year 1054. At that point there was a Schism and the Orthodox broke off from the Roman church. They essentially hold the same beliefs on a lot of core doctrine. They both believe in saints and share the same saints up until the 11th century, they believe in apostolic succession, they believe in the eucharist and 7 sacraments etc.
In terms of based, you shouldn't look for the true religion because of how based it may come across because you will be basing it off of emotion. You should be primarily concerned with finding what's true and sending your soul to heaven. Something you need to understand that most people on this board, as well as most "online" Christians only LARP as Christian, they don't actually attend Mass or Divine Liturgy, they don't try to grow in virtue, they never fast or abstain from meat, they never pray, they take habitually the Lords name in vain, and they are very uncharitable argue in bad faith etc. They look at it as an ever escalating way to score more "based" points online.
That being said, anyone telling you there aren't problems within their sect of Christianity is flat out lying. There are lots of problems with modernism in every branch of Christianity right now, I mean the world is a mess. I personally believe Traditional Catholicism is the true religion and I believe if you earnestly do your own research you will come to the same conclusions. But there is definitely a huge crisis in the Catholic Church right now regarding modernism.
I like what the Orthodox poster said, don't listen to a guy on an online board, go to a priest who's spent years in seminary studying theology. However I recommend you go to an SSPX or Traditional Catholic priest who will have a very good traditional formation. Some on the face reasons I think the Orthodox are not the One Holy Catholic Apostolic church is because they don't have the 4 marks of the true church, as soon as the great schism happened tons of Eastern Orthodox countries were immediately conquered by Islam whereas Catholic Spain was the only country in history to ever reclaim captured Islamic territory, which was during the Reconquista, and Catholicism spread like a wildfire throughout the world afterwards. Also if it wasn't for the Pope and Rome uniting a navy and winning a decisive battle during the Battle of Lepanto (Our Lady of Victory) Europe would have largely been conquered by Islam
I've personally never heard a convincing argument for Protestantism, it originated when Martin Luther split off in the 16th century from the Roman Catholic church. There are over 300 sects now and they all have wildly contradictory beliefs.
Most people don't actually know about what Catholics believe about the Pope or in general. We don't believe he is God, nor that he is a king that can change dogma and doctrine (he can't). He is only infallible when he speaks solemnly from his seat on matters of faith and morals. This has only happened once in the past 100 years and it was to define dogma in response to a heresy that was spreading against and already accepted belief in the Church. There can and have been bad Popes, and the Pope can be wrong about things.
Anyway it's kind of like drinking from a firehose, I'm trying to stay away from "gotcha" points against other denominations. Everyone will have an argument for their side which is why hearing it from a priest is the way to go.
The Roman church broke away from the One True Church. It was the Roman dogs who declared their bishop infallible and made him a king. The West Frankian king Karl, to you known as Charlemagne, was instrumental in the early Frankocratic, schismatic murmurs. 1054 is a big date, but its not where Rome began to stray from the One True Church.
Compare Western Europe under One True Church and Gallicism to Western Europe under Carolingian Frankocratia and Papism. The bishop is supposed to be a subject to the king, and the king is supposed to be baptized and coronated and legitimized by the bishop, his subject.
Give that which is God's unto God, and that which is Caesar's unto Caesar. That is why taxes are in fact not inherently evil or wrong, the problem is and will always be the khazarians.
In terms of based, you shouldn't look for the true religion because of how based it may come across because you will be basing it off of emotion. You should be primarily concerned with finding what's true and sending your soul to heaven. Something you need to understand that most people on this board, as well as most "online" Christians only LARP as Christian, they don't actually attend Mass or Divine Liturgy, they don't try to grow in virtue, they never fast or abstain from meat, they never pray, they take habitually the Lords name in vain, and they are very uncharitable argue in bad faith etc. They look at it as an ever escalating way to score more "based" points online.
That being said, anyone telling you there aren't problems within their sect of Christianity is flat out lying. There are lots of problems with modernism in every branch of Christianity right now, I mean the world is a mess. I personally believe Traditional Catholicism is the true religion and I believe if you earnestly do your own research you will come to the same conclusions. But there is definitely a huge crisis in the Catholic Church right now regarding modernism.
I like what the Orthodox poster said, don't listen to a guy on an online board, go to a priest who's spent years in seminary studying theology. However I recommend you go to an SSPX or Traditional Catholic priest who will have a very good traditional formation. Some on the face reasons I think the Orthodox are not the One Holy Catholic Apostolic church is because they don't have the 4 marks of the true church, as soon as the great schism happened tons of Eastern Orthodox countries were immediately conquered by Islam whereas Catholic Spain was the only country in history to ever reclaim captured Islamic territory, which was during the Reconquista, and Catholicism spread like a wildfire throughout the world afterwards. Also if it wasn't for the Pope and Rome uniting a navy and winning a decisive battle during the Battle of Lepanto (Our Lady of Victory) Europe would have largely been conquered by Islam
I've personally never heard a convincing argument for Protestantism, it originated when Martin Luther split off in the 16th century from the Roman Catholic church. There are over 300 sects now and they all have wildly contradictory beliefs.
Most people don't actually know about what Catholics believe about the Pope or in general. We don't believe he is God, nor that he is a king that can change dogma and doctrine (he can't). He is only infallible when he speaks solemnly from his seat on matters of faith and morals. This has only happened once in the past 100 years and it was to define dogma in response to a heresy that was spreading against and already accepted belief in the Church. There can and have been bad Popes, and the Pope can be wrong about things.
Anyway it's kind of like drinking from a firehose, I'm trying to stay away from "gotcha" points against other denominations. Everyone will have an argument for their side which is why hearing it from a priest is the way to go.
Compare Western Europe under One True Church and Gallicism to Western Europe under Carolingian Frankocratia and Papism. The bishop is supposed to be a subject to the king, and the king is supposed to be baptized and coronated and legitimized by the bishop, his subject.
Give that which is God's unto God, and that which is Caesar's unto Caesar. That is why taxes are in fact not inherently evil or wrong, the problem is and will always be the khazarians.