New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
If you look at all the news paper articles available on the lynchings of niggers almost all of them were accused of at least brutally raping a white women with many being raped plus murder and about half of them being something like raped and murdered a ten year old white girl. Alot of the victims were insanely young.

Till where the public narrative of being lynched for just whistling at a white women(which I don't really believe) is like the only sympathetic victim there is. His is the only name we hear about.

The narrative most believe of blacks randomly being lynched for no reason at all is calculated because looking at every case and the circumstances in detail reveals a picture of an epidemic of black on white child rape.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
11
HarlechMan on scored.co
1 month ago 11 points (+0 / -0 / +11Score on mirror )
The thing about lynchings is that they were basically just vigilante justice, which was also applied to thousands of White men, as well as other races too. When you apply 13/50 to the population, it all washes out. About 27% of all lynchings from the 1800's-1968 were Whites, and given that lynching was far more prevalent in the South, where black populations were much higher than the north, the crime ratio was probably more like "25 does 75". So it's not even that bias when you account for likely crime rates.

The total number of blacks lynched from 1882-1968 was around 4700. So even if they were goodboys who didndu nuffin', it's only a few years worth of of black on White murders before they "got even".
Toast message