Kirk was right about abortion
Charlie Kirk was a neocon that I considered to be just another IDW, daily wire, political commentator like Shapiro who would go to colleges to argue with liberal arts kids for viral clips. Most here would agree that he was mostly correct but a very tame, kosher persona who was right of center, but definitely not "far-right" or a true nationalist the way we view nationalism. He did, however, have a very hard stance on abortion: That it is wrong no matter what and it should be illegal. Abortionists should be harshly punished. Life begins at conception and there is no debating this biological fact.
I used to frequent conpro and post my oc here: hundreds of infotables, jokes, memes and rants all exclusive to conpro. I stopped a couple years ago because I was simply tired of the reactions. Like, I know there are antagonists paid to do it, but they are easily blocked, ignored or made an example of. They are just insignificant idf faggots. What bothered me is a paradigm shift in the actual users, many who I recognized and have extensively talked with over the years. Its more than just blackpilling, it's your idiotic, morally corrupted takes. Specifically on abortion.
Abortion is the murder of an innocent baby. There is no middle-ground. Abortion within a timeframe is still murder of an innocent baby. Abortion for the sake of eugenics is still murder of an innocent baby. Abortion of someone you dislike or dont care about is still murder of an innocent baby. Abortion is NEVER justified. It is never mercy. It is never okay. It is the inversion of all that is good: the mother who is the creator and protector becoming the destroyer. The literally satanic mantra, "this is my body"; is claiming demonic ownership and governance over the child's soul. Medically, it is an induced/forced miscarriage.
Abortion is a jewish ritual. Sanger and other jews pioneered and legalized it. It is a more modern form of blood libel (they still do their traditional blood libel, but this infanticide legally and openly). The innocent babies are financial racquet for them, they drink the blood, harvest adrenochrome, they turn the body into "flavoring" in your food (senomyx and hek) and put into cosmetic creams to be sold to rich celebrities like Oprah and Steve Harvey who rub the blood of innocent babies on their faces on TV in a ritualistic display of Satan's pride. Dead babies were in the covid vax too. I don't want to know the profits made on it because I'm sure it's an unfathomable amount.
At conception there is a literal flash of light in the womb as a new genetic code is created. The DNA is unique and has never existed before and will never exist again. The embryo is a human life under every definition that has ever existed. All sciences, biology, etc define the embryo as a new, unique, human life. That genetic code at conception has the information for almost every trait of the baby, from their eye color to their favorite flavor of ice cream.
But you racists know genetics. You all know the crime statistics and such. Some of you claim abortion is justified because undesirables do it. This is retarded and morally corrupted. More whites have died from abortion than all of history's wars combined. It is about one million innocent babies killed every year in America alone. Not only do you justify the murder or innocent babies for their race (statistically at worst, 1/3 blacks will become antisocial and commit crimes, but 0% of babies are guilty), you consider innocent white babies to be acceptable collateral damage.
If you make any excuse for it, you are a piece of shit. If you make excuses for abortion while also showing any support for nationalism or white replacement / genocide awareness, you are severely hurting the movement and you should shut the fuck up. Go homestead in the woods and fulfill your cowardly fantasy so that the real nationalists can work.
Charlie Kirk was a neocon that I considered to be just another IDW, daily wire, political commentator like Shapiro who would go to colleges to argue with liberal arts kids for viral clips. Most here would agree that he was mostly correct but a very tame, kosher persona who was right of center, but definitely not "far-right" or a true nationalist the way we view nationalism. He did, however, have a very hard stance on abortion: That it is wrong no matter what and it should be illegal. Abortionists should be harshly punished. Life begins at conception and there is no debating this biological fact.
I used to frequent conpro and post my oc here: hundreds of infotables, jokes, memes and rants all exclusive to conpro. I stopped a couple years ago because I was simply tired of the reactions. Like, I know there are antagonists paid to do it, but they are easily blocked, ignored or made an example of. They are just insignificant idf faggots. What bothered me is a paradigm shift in the actual users, many who I recognized and have extensively talked with over the years. Its more than just blackpilling, it's your idiotic, morally corrupted takes. Specifically on abortion.
Abortion is the murder of an innocent baby. There is no middle-ground. Abortion within a timeframe is still murder of an innocent baby. Abortion for the sake of eugenics is still murder of an innocent baby. Abortion of someone you dislike or dont care about is still murder of an innocent baby. Abortion is NEVER justified. It is never mercy. It is never okay. It is the inversion of all that is good: the mother who is the creator and protector becoming the destroyer. The literally satanic mantra, "this is my body"; is claiming demonic ownership and governance over the child's soul. Medically, it is an induced/forced miscarriage.
Abortion is a jewish ritual. Sanger and other jews pioneered and legalized it. It is a more modern form of blood libel (they still do their traditional blood libel, but this infanticide legally and openly). The innocent babies are financial racquet for them, they drink the blood, harvest adrenochrome, they turn the body into "flavoring" in your food (senomyx and hek) and put into cosmetic creams to be sold to rich celebrities like Oprah and Steve Harvey who rub the blood of innocent babies on their faces on TV in a ritualistic display of Satan's pride. Dead babies were in the covid vax too. I don't want to know the profits made on it because I'm sure it's an unfathomable amount.
At conception there is a literal flash of light in the womb as a new genetic code is created. The DNA is unique and has never existed before and will never exist again. The embryo is a human life under every definition that has ever existed. All sciences, biology, etc define the embryo as a new, unique, human life. That genetic code at conception has the information for almost every trait of the baby, from their eye color to their favorite flavor of ice cream.
But you racists know genetics. You all know the crime statistics and such. Some of you claim abortion is justified because undesirables do it. This is retarded and morally corrupted. More whites have died from abortion than all of history's wars combined. It is about one million innocent babies killed every year in America alone. Not only do you justify the murder or innocent babies for their race (statistically at worst, 1/3 blacks will become antisocial and commit crimes, but 0% of babies are guilty), you consider innocent white babies to be acceptable collateral damage.
If you make any excuse for it, you are a piece of shit. If you make excuses for abortion while also showing any support for nationalism or white replacement / genocide awareness, you are severely hurting the movement and you should shut the fuck up. Go homestead in the woods and fulfill your cowardly fantasy so that the real nationalists can work.
Kirk's basis on his no exceptions stance is simply that the child is an innocent human life. It is simply wrong to kill the baby. It is outside of our rights (that is, right as in correct thing to do, not right as in legal capability) to cast mortal punishment on a child who has done nothing wrong. Thisis true no matter the circumstances.
Planned Parenthood announced that the majority of abortions are performed on women who have already had one in the past. This means that the procedure is mostly being used as a twisted form of birth control because women have tragically been brainwashed to believe their child is worthless.
It is so important to understand that this outlier trick has been used for a century. Over the last century, millions of innocent children have been slaughtered in the womb while so few of them were conceived from rape. The total number of deaths are greater than all our wartime casualties combined.
The outlier trick is always paired with an appeal to emotion. Strong emotion, especially sympathy and sorrow, is an easy tool to use to sway someone from righteous truth. It usually looks something like:
> *...your mother, wife or daughter would have their rapist sperm swim in them and spawn grow insde them*
Pro-infanticide arguments always resort to outliers and hypotheticals that try to pull on emotional responses, while pro-life arguments are always based in objective truths:
- The unborn child is a human life with unique DNA
- the child is innocent
- it is wrong to murder the child
--------------------
> *There are plenty of children that need adoption and there arent enough adopting families for them*
False. There are far more people looking to adopt than there are orphans, that's why people so often end up with foreign babies. What did the victims do for billions of years before the kike "doctors" created the horrific procedure during the bolshevik era? Also check this out: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_orphans_and_foundlings
Someday you will see that my position is the correct one, and you will look back on the past and see yourself as being immature and emotional.
Source: your ass.
It's an outlier that idiots like you are bent on defending, not realizing you push people AWAY from anti abortion stances.
It doesn't matter it's an outlier, again, you are imposing on a raped woman to carry the child of the rapist inside her body to term and helping the rapist father a child. THAT'S AN OBJECTIVE TRUTH, since you like that term so much.
That's all there is to it, ignoring the adoption part/what happens after birth.