New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
62
Christian identity (media.scored.co)
posted 1 month ago by derjudenjager on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +62Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
LGBTQIAIDS on scored.co
1 month ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Regarding the origin of the negroid, in Apartheid-era South Africa, the Dutch Reformed Church claimed that the negroid instead came from Ham/Canaan, that is, until it turned against Apartheid. This relates to the 'curse of Ham' from Genesis. The negroid's black skin was, for instance, considered part of that punishment.

If Christian Identity claims that the negroid came from Cain and apes, but the Apartheid-era religious authorities claimed that the negroid came from the 'curse of Ham', why should the CI interpretation be trusted, for instance, over the aforementioned Apartheid-era interpretation?
genesisSOC on scored.co
1 month ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
CI and Aparatheid are claiming mostly the same things; niggers and non-Whites come from Cain. Where Aparatheid errors is Noah's Flood. The Flood was local and not worldwide, so it didn't kill all the non-Whites. Enoch goes more in depth in this as well. Moses specifically said it covered a local area, not the whole world, as he used two separate terms for "local land" and "whole world" but jews have subverted it so far that now everyone just thinks it was worldwide and somehow Noah actually did gather 2 of every whale and insect and other animals worldiwde on his arc instead of only those local to him to start a fresh farmstead to feed his family after.\
So because the Flood was local, not worldwide, Ham would not have created the niggers. They already existed before the Flood and were not included in it. Ham's descendants do indeed include Canaan though, as he was the first one to completely mix their White DNA out of existence. Cush became the Ethiopians, Mizraim became the Egptians, and Phut became Libya.
Toast message